Anastasi, A, dan Urbina, S. (1997). Tes Psikologi (Psychological Testing). PT. Prehanllindo, Jakarta. cc. p. 14.
Choirudin. (2017). “Efektivitas Pembelajaran Berbasis Schoology”. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 52-62.
Eysenck, H.J dan Kamin L. (1981). Intelligence: The Batle For The Mind. Pan Book. London dan Sydney.
Fuys, D., D. Geddes. & R. Tischler. (1988). “The Van Hiele Model Of Thinking in Geometry Among Adolescents”. Monograph Number 3. Reston: NCTM.
Latifah, S., & Utami, A. (2019). “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Interaktif Berbasis Media Social Schoology”. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 36-45.
Mason, M. (2009). “The Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Understanding”. Virginia: University of Virginia.
PISA. (2015). “Draft Collaborative Problem Solving Framework”, hlm. 3
Ruseffendi, E.T. (2006). Pengantar kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensiya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: TARSITO.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suparlan, A. (2013). “Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together(NHT) dan Tipe Two Stay Two Stray(TSTS) pada Pembelajaran Matematika Ditinjau dari Intelligence Quotient Siswa Kelas VII SMP di Kabuaten Purworejo Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012”. Tesis. Solo: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Surat Edaran Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Belajar dari Rumah dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19).
Tieng, P. G., & Eu, L. K. (2014). “Improving Students' Van Hiele Level of geometric Thinking Using Geometer's Sketchpad”. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 2 Issue 3, 20-31.
Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels And Achievement In Secondary School
Geometry. Chicago: The University of Chicago.z
Yazdani, M. (2007). “Correlation between Students' level of Understanding Geometry According to the Van Hieles' Model and Students' Achievement in Plane Geometry”. Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Mathematics Education, 1(5): 40-45.
- Abstract viewed - 131 times
- PDF downloaded - 144 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2022
Affiliations
Nurul Ma'rifah
student
Iwan Junaedi
Affiliation not stated
Mulyono Mulyono
Affiliation not stated
How to Cite
Analysis Of Geometry Thinking Ability Based on Intellegence Quotient Category in Schoology Assisted Collaborrative Problem Learning
Vol 11 No 1 (2022): June 2022
Submitted: Feb 3, 2022
Published: Jun 30, 2022
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find patterns of students' geometric thinking abilities in terms of intelligence quotient (IQ) on collaborative problem-solving learning (CPS) assisted schoology. The research subjects were 31 students of class VII SMP Negeri 3 Temanggung for the academic year 2020/2021. IQ Score collected by the questionnaire method. Observation, documentation, and interview methods were used to find patterns of geometric thinking ability. Results The study showed that the IQ of the subjects in the focus of the study was found to have four categories, namely high average IQ, average IQ, low average IQ, and borderline defect IQ. The pattern of students ' geometric thinking ability varies for each IQ category. It was found that the pattern of geometric thinking ability was found, especially for the average and low IQ. The wedge pattern occurs because of the impact of CPS learning.