Amirulmukminin. 2017. “Analisis Kemampuan Calon Guru Matematika dalam Pengajuan Masalah Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent”. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif Inovatif, 8(1): 69-75.
Anandita, D., Sukasno, & Mulyono, D. 2016. “Efektivitas Model Auditory Intellectually Repetition Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 8 Lubuklinggau Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017”. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2 (2): 20-35.
Budiono, C. S., & Wardono. 2014. ” PBM Berorientasi Pisa Berpendekatan PMRI Bermedia LKPD Meningkatkan Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP”. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 3 (3): 210-219.
Burhan, A. V, Mirna & Suherman. 2014. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran AIR Pada Pembelajaran Matemtika Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 18 Padang”. Jurnal Pendidikan Matemtika. 3(1): 6-11.
Diyarko & Waluya, S, B. 2016. “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau dari Metakognisi dalam Pembelajaran Inkuiri Berbantuan Lembar Kerja Mandiri Mailing Merge”. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 5 (1): 70-80.
Hakim, A. B. 2016. “Efektifitas Penggunaan E-Learning Moodle, Google Classroom Dan Edmodo”. Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 2(1): 2-6.
Hammi, Zedha. 2017. ”Implementasi Google Classroom Pada Kelas XI IPA MAN 2 Kudus”. Unnes Journal Of Mathematics Education Research, 5(1). 54-61.
Harahap, R.E., & Surya, E. 2017. “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Kelas VII dalam Menyelesaikan Persamaan Linier Satu Variabel”. Jurnal Education Mathematic, 7(1): 44-54.
Lestari, K.E & Yudhanegara, M.R. 2015. Penelitian Pendidikan Matemtika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Moleong, L. J. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munir. 2012. Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh (2nd ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ngilawajan, D. A. (2013). “Proses Berpikir Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika MaTeri Turunan Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent”. PEDAGOGIA, 2(1), 71–83.
Ningsih, P. S. (2017). “Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Berdasarkan Revisi Taksonomi Bloom Pada Peserta Didik Kelas VIII Mts Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung”. Disertasi. Lampung: UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Nolaputra, A.P., Wardono & Supriyono. 2018. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika pada Pembelajaran PBL Pendekatan RME Berbantuan Schoology Siswa SMP. PRISMA 1. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 15: 18-32.
OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Assesment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Raeding, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publisher.
Purnamasari, D. 2013. “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa”. Educational Psychology Journal, 2 (1): 13-21.
Putri, E. L., Dwijanto, D., & Sugiman, S. 2017. “Analysis of Mathematical Communication Skills and Confidence of 10th Grader of SMK in Geometry Material Viewed from Cognitive Style”. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1): 97-107.
Putriana, Y. (2017). “Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Siswa SMA”. Disertasi. Semarang: Pendidikan Matematika FKIP.
Qoriawati, R., Sulistyawati, I., & Yustitia V. 2021. “Literasi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent”. UNION: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9 (2): 215-225.
Rahayuningsih, Sri. 2017. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Matematika Model Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR)”. Erudio (Journal Of Educational Innovation), (3)2: 67-83.
Rosyada, S. M. A., & Wardono, 2021. “Analisis Kualitatif Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif pada Pembelajaran Daring Model MURDER dengan Pendekatan Humanistik Berbantuan Schoology”. (PRISMA) Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 4: 397-405.
Rr. Kuntie Sulistyowaty & Firdaus. 2020. “Penggunaan Google Classroom dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Jarak Jauh untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa”. Lentera Sriwijaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2 (2): 14-24.
Rusmining, Waluya, S.B, & Sugianto. 2014. “Analysis Of Mathematics Literacy, Learning Constructivism and Character Education (Case Studiesmon XI Class Of SMK Rodlotus Saidiyyah Semarang, Indonesia)”. International Journal Of Education And Research, 2: 331-340.
Sahrudin, A. 2014. “Implementasi Strategi Pembelajaran Discovery untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMA”. Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika, 2(1): 1–12.
Salamah, W. 2020. “Deskripsi Penggunaan Aplikasi Google Classroom dalam Proses Pembelajaran”. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 4 (3): 533-538.
Sari, R. H. N. 2015. “Literasi Matematika: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana?”. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY. 713-720.
Shoimin, A. 2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar Ruzz Media.
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syawahid, M., & Putrawangsa, S. 2017. “Kemampuan literasi matematika SMP Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar”. Beta, Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 10 (2): 222-240.
Utami, T. R. (2020). :Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif”. Skripsi. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati.
Utomo, M. F. W., Pujiastuti, H., & Mutaqin, A. 2020. “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa”. (Kreano) Jurnal Matematika Kreatif – Inovatif, 11(2): 185-193.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R & Cox. PW Winter. (1977). “Field-Dependent And Field-Independent Cognitive Styles And Their Educational Implications”. Review Of Educational Research, 47 (1): 1-64.
- Abstract viewed - 177 times
- PDF downloaded - 52 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2022
Affiliations
Elis Fitria Herliani
Pascasrajana, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Wardono Wardono
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Budi Waluya
Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
Mathematical Literacy Seen from Cognitive Style in Learning of Auditory Intellectually Repetition Model with Constructivism Approach Assisted by Google Classroom
Vol 11 No 2 (2022): December 2022
Submitted: Mar 11, 2022
Published: Dec 30, 2022
Abstract
This study aims to describe mathematical literacy seen from cognitive style in learning of Auditory Intellectually Repetition model with constructivism approach assisted by google classroom. This research is a type of qualitative research. The approach used in this study is a descriptive approach. The subjects in this study were class VIII G of SMP Negeri 1 Welahan. Subjects were chosen by each of the 5 students based on the type of cognitive style Field Independent (FI) and type cognitive style Field Dependent (FD). Data collection is done by Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT), interview guide, and observation. The results of this study indicate that students with a cognitive style Field Independent (FI) capable of the mathematical literacy component communication, mathematizing, representation, and using symbolic, formal, and technical language and operation. Less capable on components devising strategies for solving problems. sufficient on components using mathematics tools. Then students with type cognitive style Field Dependent (FD) is sufficient of the mathematical literacy component communication, devising strategies for solving problems, using symbolic, formal, and technical language and operation. Then less able on components mathematizing, representation, reasoning and argument, using mathematics tools.