Aisyah, N., Hawa, S., Somakim, S., & Purwoko, P. (2007). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Nasional.
Asikin, M., & Junaedi, I. (2013). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Smp Dalam Setting Pembelajaran Rme (Realistic Mathematics Education). Unnes Journal of Research Mathematics Education, 2(1).
Fajriyah, E., Mulyono, & Asikin, M. (2020). Mathematical Literacy Ability Reviewed from Cognitive Style of Students on Mind mapping Learning Model with Constructivism Approach. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 57–64.
Faozi, R., Wardono, W., Haryani, S., & Al Miftah Sindangjaya, Mt. (2020). Mathematical Literacy Ability Reviewed From Self-Efficacy In Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. Journal of Primary Education, 9(4), 353–363.
Fatir, Muhamad, S. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbasis Hands On Activity Pada Materi Statistika Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 1(2).
Fauzan, A., Plomp, T., & Gravemeijer, K. (2013). The development of an RME-based geometrycourse for Indonesian primary schools. In T. Plomp, & Nieveen (Eds). Educational design research - Part B Illustrative cases, (2013), 159–178.
Fauzana, R., Dahlan, J. A., & Jupri, A. (2020). The influence of realistic mathematics education (RME) approach in enhancing students’ mathematical literacy skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3).
Fauziah, I., & Mariani, S. (2017). Kemampuan Penalaran Geometris Siswa pada Pembelajaran RME dengan Penekanan Handso on Activity Berdasarkan Aktivitas Belajar. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(1), 30–37.
Febriyana, D., & Suyitno, H. (2018). Analysis of Mathematical literacy Ability Viewed From Students’ Mathematics Self-concept Based on Gender Differences on IMPROVE Learning with PMRI Approach. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(2), 182–188.
Hadi, S. (2005). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik. Banjarmasin: Tulip.
Heuvel-panhuizen, M. Van Den. (2020). National Reflections on the Netherlands Didactics of Mathematics Teaching and Learning in the Context.
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on Activities and Their Influence on Students’ Interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743–757.
Hudojo, H. (1998). Mengajar Belajar Matematika. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Junaedi, I, & Asikin, M. (2012). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika Humanistik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemahiran Matematis. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 1(2), 114–120.
Junaedi, Iwan, Asikin, M., & Masrukan, M. (2015). Penerapan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) dengan Konteks Karakter dan Konservasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 177.
Kartono, K. (2010). Hands On Activity Pada Pembelajaran Geometri Sekolah Sebagai Asesmen Kinerja Siswa. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 1(1), 21–32.
Kusumaningsih, W., Darhim, Herman, T., & Turmudi. (2018). Improvement algebraic thinking ability using multiple representation strategy on realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 281–290.
Lange, J. de. (2003). Mathematics for Literacy, In Quantitative Literacy, Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges. Proceeding of the National Forum on Quantitative Literacy. Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges. Washington D.C: National Academy of Sciences.
Maulana, M., Sujana, A., Juanda, D., Hanifah, N., & Saptani, E. (2009). Model Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Sumedang: UPI Press.
Mawaddah, S., & Maryanti, R. (2016). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran Menggunakan Model Penemuan Terbimbing (Discovery Learning). EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 76–85.
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able To Put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everyday Use? Journal of mathematics Education, 4 (1), 89–100.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Improving Mathematics Teaching in Kindergarten with Realistic Mathematical Education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(3), 369–378.
Rumiati, S. W. (2011). ) Instrument Hasil Penilaian belajar matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: P4TK Matematika.
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126.
Susanto, A. (2013). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar (Ke Empat). Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). the Didactical Use of Models in Realistic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 9–35.
Wardono, W. (2013). Peningkatan literasi matematika melalui pembelajaran inovatif berpenilaian, 65–76.
Widyati, W. (2014). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Perspektif Teori Kognitivisme. Biosel: Biology Science and Education, 3(2), 177.
Yingprayoon, J. (2017). Creative Mathematics Hands-on Activities in the Classroom. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, ICME-13 Monograph, (Teaching and Learning of Arithmetic and Number Systems), 759–760.
- Abstract viewed - 150 times
- PDF downloaded - 99 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2022
Affiliations
Yosi Pebriana
UNNES
Sri Wardani
Affiliation not stated
Iwan Junaedi
Affiliation not stated
How to Cite
Mathematical Literacy Abilities of Fifth-Grade Students in View of Adversity Quotient in Hands on Activity-Based RME Learning
Vol 11 No 2 (2022): December 2022
Submitted: Sep 19, 2022
Published: Dec 30, 2022
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify patterns of fifth-grade students' mathematics literacy abilities in relation to adversity quotient. This study is a combination form of sequential explanatory study, where quantitative data is the primary data. In this study, the population was class V of the Padarek region, and the sample consisted of SDN Padarek I and SDN Padarek III. The sample was selected by random sampling. The results of the study on hands-on activity-assisted RME learning revealed a correlation between the achievement of each indicator and mathematical literacy. Quitter students may complete one pattern of literacy accomplishment indicators, namely formulating, whereas camper and climber students can fulfill all three patterns, namely formulating, employing, and interpreting. The quitter, camper, and climber process capability patterns meet all achievement indicators, namely communication, mathematizing, representation, devising strategies, using symbols, and using mathematics tools, but the indicators for using mathematics tools and devising strategies have not been optimally achieved. On the basis of the pattern uncovered regarding each student's mathematical literacy ability, it is recommended to maximize learning in order to get better mathematical literacy abilities.