Fajri, H. M., Misdalina, M., & Kesumawati, N. (2021). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of SMP 1 Kelekar Students Analized Based on Student Learning Motivation. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 12(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v12i1.28337
Gabriella, J., & Imami, A. ihsan. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Pada Materi Spldv. Maju, 8(1), 454–458.
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills, a Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. SAGE Publications.
Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2022). Utilizing Learning Analytics to Support Students’ Academic Self-efficacy and Problem-Solving Skills. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00548-4
Kurniyawati, Y., Mahmudi, A., & Wahyuningrum, E. (2019). Efektivitas problem-based learning ditinjau dari keterampilan pemecahan masalah dan kemandirian belajar matematis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i1.26985
Lukito, S., Hanifah, & Maizora, S. (2019). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 3(3), 293–300.
Masitoh, L. F., & Fitriyani, H. (2018). Improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy through problem based learning. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v1i1.679
Nurkaeti, N. (2018). Polya’s Strategy: An Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Difficulty in 5 th Grade Elemntary School. EduHumaniora Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 140–147.
Rahayu, I. F., & Aini, I. N. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa SMP Pada Materi Bilangan Bulat 1. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 70–81.
Saragih, S. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel ( SPLDV ). Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v3i2.3897
Somawati, S. (2018). Peran Efikasi Diri (Self Efficacy) terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.29210/118800
Sudjana. (2005). Metode Statistik. Tarsito Bandung.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Utami, R. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dan Self-Efficacy Siswa SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 166–175.
- Abstract viewed - 165 times
- PDF downloaded - 137 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2022
Affiliations
Luluk Ulfa Chasani
Program Pascasarjana
Kartono Kartono
Affiliation not stated
Iqbal Kharisudin
Affiliation not stated
How to Cite
The Implementation of Immediate Feedback in Problem-based Learning: The Problem-Solving Skill Analysis Seen from Self-Efficacy
Vol 11 No 2 (2022): December 2022
Submitted: Nov 19, 2022
Published: Dec 30, 2022
Abstract
One of the common problems faced by some students in learning mathematics is: low in answering questions related to problem solving. The purpose of this study was to describe the problem-solving ability of students through immediate feedback on learning Problem-based Learning in terms of self-efficacy of students. This research was conducted with a qualitative descriptive approach. The research subjects of Class X Mathematics and Natural Sciences 3 SMA Negeri 2 Grabag academic year 2021/2022 were 36 people. This study uses a problem based learning model with immediate feedback. Data were collected by test, questionnaire, observation, documentation, and interview methods. The results of problem-solving ability test achievement of students in terms of self-efficacy in learning problem-based learning with immediate feedback are quite varied. Problem-solving ability reviewed self-efficacy showed that students with high problem-solving ability test and self-efficacy categories could understand and master the four indicators, students with medium problem-solving ability test and self-efficacy categories could understand and master the three indicators, and students with low problem-solving ability test and self-efficacy categories can understand and master both indicators.