The Difference of Lured Rat Number between Uncombined and Combined Bait Trapping

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 31, 2020
https://doi.org/10.15294/ujph.v9i1.32571
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol 9 No 1 (2020): Unnes Journal of Public Health

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rizka Khoirunnisa
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Arum Siwiendrayanti
Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

 


Abstract


Live traps usually can only trap rats in the first day of trapping because the bait become not luring anymore after the first day of trapping. The purpose of this study was to determine the  differences in lured rats number between uncombined bait trapping and combined bait trapping.


This is a quasi-experimental study with a post-test only non-equivalent control group design. Each house has 5 traps setup with 6 replications. One trap was set with combined bait types (rice, anchovy, tofu and roasted coconut) and four other traps set with separated uncombined bait types; (1) rice, (2) anchovy, (3) tofu, (4) roasted coconut. The instruments used were house screening sheets, traps and observation sheets. The data obtained were tested with the Mann-Whitney test.


The results showed that there were not significant differences in trapped rats number between combined bait and uncombined rice bait (p=0.748), between combined bait and uncombined anchovy bait (p=0.355), between combined bait and uncombined tofu bait (p=1.000), and also between combined bait and uncombined roasted coconut bait (p=0.734). Uncombined anchovies bait trapped rats most. Combined bait and uncombined anchovy bait were most consistent in trapping rats.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Khoirunnisa, R., & Siwiendrayanti, A. (2020). The Difference of Lured Rat Number between Uncombined and Combined Bait Trapping. Unnes Journal of Public Health, 9(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujph.v9i1.32571

References

Anggara, A. W., & Sudarmaji. 2008. Pengendalian Hama Tikus Terpadu (PHTT). Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.
Astuti, D. R. 2013. Keefektifan Rodentisida Racun Kronis Generasi II terhadap Keberhasilan Penangkapan Tikus. Kemas, 8(2), 183-189.
Dedi, Sarbino, & Hendarti, I. 2012. Uji Preferensi Beberapa Jenis Bahan untuk Dijadikan Umpan Tikus Sawah. Undergraduate Thesis. Pontianak: Universitas Tanjungpura.
Ivakdalam, L.M. 2014. Pengendalian Tikus Sawah (Rattus Argentiventer) Menggunakan Pengujian Tiga Jenis Repellen. Jurnal Agribisnis Kepulauan, 2(1), 53-62.
Ivakdalam, L.M. 2014. Uji Keefektifan Enam Jenis Perangkap dalam Pengendalian Tikus Sawah (Rattus argentiventer). Jurnal Agribisnis Kepulauan, 2(2), 38-46.
Junianto, S.D., & Siwiendrayanti, A. 2015. Perbandingan Jumlah Tikus yang Tertangkap antara Perangkap dengan Umpan Kelapa Bakar, Ikan Teri dengan Perangkap Tanpa Menggunakan Umpan (Studi Kasus Di Wilayah Kerrja Puskesmas Pandanaran Kota Semarang). Unnes Journal of Public Health, 5(1), 67-74.
Lagwen, P. 2016. Response Od Rice Yield to Rat Damage in Irrigated Rice in Mvomero District, Mogorogo, Tanzania. Master Thesis. Tanzania: Cropscience of Sokoine University Agriculture.
Martina, L., Sukismanto, & Werdiningsih, I. 2018. Perbedaan Jenis Umpan Terhadap Jumlah Rodentia Tertangkap di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Cangkringan. Jurnal Medika Respati, 13(2), 10-19.
Mulyana, A. N. 2017. Keberhasilan Pemerangkapan Tikus dengan Tiga Jenis Umpan pada Habitat Luar Rumah di Dramaga, Bogor. Undergraduate Thesia. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Permada, J. 2009. Tingkat Kejeraan Racun dan Umpan pada Tikus Sawah (Rattus argentiventer Rob.& Klo.), Tikus Rumah (Rattus rattus diardi Linn.) dan Tikus Pohon (Rattus tiomanicus Mill.). Undergraduate Thesis. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Puskesmas Kedungmundu. 2018. Laporan Kasus Leptospirosis. Semarang: Puskesmas Kedungmundu.
Putri, R. S. 2013. Studi Perbedaan Kesukaan Umpan Dalam Pengendalian Tikus di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Undergraduate Thesis. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Ristiyanto, F. H., Boewono, D., & Heriyanto, B. 2014. Penyakit Tular Rodensia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Rusdy, A., & Fatmal, I. 2008. Preferensi Tikus (Rattus argentiventer) terhadap Jenis Umpan pada Tanaman Padi Sawah. Jurnal Floratek, 3, 68-73.
Rusmini. 2011. Bahaya Leptospirosis (Penyakit Kencing Tikus) & Cara Pencegahannya. Yogyakarta: Gosyen Publishing.
Sholikhah, N., & Budiati, R. E. 2017. Keefektifitas Jenis Umpan Dalam Keberhasilan Penagkapan Tikus Rattus tanezumi sebagai Reservoar Leptospirosis. Proceeding HEFA, 334-340.
Supriyati, D., & Ustiawan, A. 2013. Spesies Tikus, Cecurut dan Pinjal yang Ditemukan Di Pasar Kota Banjarnegara, Kabupaten Banjarnegara Tahun 2013. Balaba, 9(02), 39-46.
Syamsuddin. 2007. Tingkah Laku Tikus dan Pengendaliannya. Presented in Seminar Ilmiah dan Pertemuan Tahunan PEI dan PFI XVIII Komda Sul-Sel.
Wibowo, G. S. 2016. Uji Preferensi Pakan Karbohidrat, Protein, dan Rodentisida pada Tiga Spesies Tikus Hama. Undergraduate Thesis. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Yunianto, B., & Ramadhani, T. 2010. Kajian Epidemiologi Leptospirosis di Kota Semarang dan Kabupaten Demak Tahun 2008. Balaba, 6(01), 7-11.