Effect of Taxpayer Data and Information Confidentiality Principle on Tax Amnesty Against Law Enforcement in Indonesia Tax Law, Law and Technology

Main Article Content

Ratih Damayanti


The principle of confidentiality in the Tax Amnesty can have a negative impact, the impact of which may occur frauds by individual taxpayers and tax officials. If there is fraud, the process of investigation and investigation to find evidence will be difficult. Law enforcement agencies and examining bodies such as the KPK, BPK, and other related agencies will have difficulties and will not be able to break through taxpayer assets or data because these assets and data are private and protected by law. This can hamper the law enforcement process, especially law enforcement in the tax sector. The principle of confidentiality in Tax Amnesty has an effect on law enforcement. The principle of confidentiality in Tax Amnesty provides potential moral hazard. A moral hazard occurs because of the opportunities or opportunities that enable these actions to materialize. Opportunities for Fiscus and Taxpayers to meet in person. This has the potential to cause a gray area between the Taxpayer and the Fiscus which can cause moral hazard to the Taxpayer. The authority of the Fiscus is prone to be misused, so that it can lead to several criminal actions that can be carried out, namely embezzlement or corruption that can harm the country's finances. And when the crime occurs at a Tax Amnesty Taxpayer, it will be difficult to enforce the law because the data and information sourced from the Declaration and its attachments cannot be used as a basis for investigation, investigation, and / or criminal prosecution of the Taxpayer cannot be used as a taxpayer basis for investigation, investigation and / or criminal prosecution of taxpayers.


Article Details

How to Cite
Damayanti, R. (2019). Effect of Taxpayer Data and Information Confidentiality Principle on Tax Amnesty Against Law Enforcement in Indonesia. Unnes Law Journal, 5(1), 55-96. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v5i1.28980
Research Article


Djafar Saidi, M., 2007, Pembaharuan Hukum Pajak, Penerbit PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Maria SW Suwarjono, 1989. Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Fakultas
Hukum UGM.
Marwan Effendy, 2012, Diskresi, Penemuan Hukum, Korporasi & Tax Amnesty Dalam
Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Referensi
Nugroho, SBM, 2016. Kebijakan yang Tumpang Tindih dan Kontraproduktif. Semarang: Suara
Merdeka, 14 Maret 2016.
Rianto Adi, 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Hukum. Jakarta: Granit.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1994. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sanafiah Faisal, 1990. Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar-Dasar dan Aplikasi. Malang: Y.A.3.
Soerjono Soekanto,1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Suharsini Arikunto, 1996. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta,
Jurnal Ilmiah
Agnes Harvelian, 2017, Implikasi Hukum Dan Legalitas Tax Amnesty Terhadap Tingkat
Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Di Indonesia, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 10 No. 3
Ardy Raditya Hendrawa, 2016, Implementasi Kebijakan Tax Amnesty Terhadap Lembaga
Perbankan Dalam Melaksanakan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian, Jurnal Hukum Penerbit Fakultas
Hukum, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta