Conflict Between Health Law and Territorial Quarantine Law Regarding the Provision of COVID-19 Vaccine Health Law, Law and Policy, Health Policy

Article Sidebar

Full Text (English)
Published Apr 30, 2021
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.44376

Main Article Content

Yazid Bustomi
Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Abstract

In the context of preventing the increasingly widespread Covid-19 which has claimed many lives, the Indonesian government has made various efforts to overcome this and the most recent effort is giving Covid-19 vaccinations to the public. In practice, various conflicts emerge and one of them is the conflict between Law Number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine which states that vaccines are an obligation and Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health which states that vaccines are a right. This type of research is juridical normative using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that Covid-19 is an emergency so that the principle of non-habet legem necessity applies, which means that in a state of legal emergency it does not apply, so that regulatory conflicts regarding Covid-19 vaccination do not become a problem, because the current government's efforts are the safety of the people. the highest law in an emergency, this is also in line with the salus populi suprema et lex principle. To ensure the safety of the people, the government is obliged to make efforts to vaccinate Covid-19 to restore the situation to its original state, this is in line with the principle of restutio in integrum. In its enforcement, sanctions are needed to make the community obey. However, several regulations have different norms regarding sanctions for those who do not comply and until now there have been no specific regulations from the center regarding the provision of the Covid-19 vaccine. As a conclusion, currently giving the Covid-19 vaccine is mandatory because it is an emergency, but the government also needs to make special regulations from the center regarding vaccine administration regulations so that there are no disparities between each of the regulations from the vaccine-giving regions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bustomi, Y. (2021). Conflict Between Health Law and Territorial Quarantine Law Regarding the Provision of COVID-19 Vaccine. Unnes Law Journal, 7(1), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.44376
Issue
Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Unnes L.J. (April, 2021)
Section
Research Article
Author Biography

Yazid Bustomi, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Yazid Bustomi is a Student at Universitas Negeri Surabaya (UNESA), Indonesia. Some of his works have been published on several journals, such as: Urgensi Kriminalisasi Kepemilikan Perolehan dan Penggunaan Airsoft Gun Tanpa Izin (Novum, 2021), Efektivitas Hukum Pidana dalam Melindungi Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Era Sekarang dan Mendatang (Nagari Law Review, 2020), and Kepastian Hukum Tentang Penggunaan Airsoft Gun di Indonesia (2019).

References

Bustomi, Y. (2020). Efektivitas Hukum Pidana dalam Melindungi Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Era Sekarang dan Mendatang. 4(1), 79–91.

Febriansyah, R. F. (2009). Eksistensi dan Prospek Pengaturan Perppu Dalam Sistem Norma Hukum Negara Republik Indonesia. Legislasi Indonesia, 6(4), 667–681. Retrieved from https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/338

Indonesia.go.id. (2020). Mengenal 6 Jenis Vaksin Covid-19 Pilihan. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from INDONESIA.GO.ID website: https://www.indonesia.go.id/narasi/indonesia-dalam-angka/sosial/mengenal-6-jenis-vaksin-covid-19-pilihan

Jacob, C. E. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penetapan Keadaan Darurat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Lex Et Societatis, 6(7), 60–67. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/view/25804

Lbn. Toruan, H. D. (2016). Implikasi Hukum Pemberian Kredit Bank Menjadi Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Legal Implications of Bank Loans Turn into Corruption). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 16(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2016.V16.41-60

Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitin Hukum (12th ed.). Jakarta: KENCANA.

Matompo, O. S. (2014). Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Prespektif Keadaan Darurat. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(1), 58–72. Retrieved from https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1157

Ristiawati, R. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Presiden Menurut Sistem Ketatanegaraan Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Badamai Law Journal, 3(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v3i1.5918

Satgas COVID-19. (2021). Peta Sebaran COVID-19. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from Covid-19.go website: https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran

Satria, H. (2018). Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana. Media Hukum, 25(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0107.111-123

Wardani, Y. K., & Fakih, M. (2018). Praktik Penerapan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 290 Tahun 2008 Tentang Persetujuan Tindakan Kedokteran (Informed Consent) Pada Pelayanan Gawat Darurat Di Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Hukum Replik, 5(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v5i2.921

Worldometer. (2021). Coronavirus Cases. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from Worldometer website: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdvegas1?

Zakaria, M., & Sulistijaningsih, S. (2020). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Pelaksanaan Asimilasi Di Rumah Berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Hukum Dan Ham Republik Indonesia Nomor M.Hh-19.Pk.01.04.04 Tahun 2020 Dalam Rangka Pencegahan Dan Penanggulangan Covid-19 Bagi Narapidana. Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 18(2), 156–181. Retrieved from https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/9932

Zamroni, M. (2018). Kekuasaan Presiden Dalam Mengeluarkan Perppu (President’s Authority to Issue Perppu). Legislasi Indonesia, 12(3), 1–38. Retrieved from https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/410

Zamzami, A. (2020). Pelaksanaan Fungsi Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Yurispruden, 3(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v3i2.6736