The Conclusive Phase of Civil Case Resolution: Examining Execution and Post-Decision Challenges in Indonesian Civil Procedural Law

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Oct 31, 2023
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v9i2.74836

Main Article Content

Retno Kus Setyowati
Faculty of Law, Krisnadwipayana University

Abstract

The culmination of a civil case in court is marked by the crucial step of decision implementation, commonly known as execution. Execution can only proceed when the decision attains permanent legal force ('inkracht van gewijsde'). While the losing party may voluntarily execute the decision, failure to fulfill stipulated obligations empowers the winning party, the plaintiff, to seek forced execution. Despite the irrevocable legal status of a decision, as signified by its permanent legal force, Indonesian civil procedural law affords opportunities for litigants and third parties to reassess such decisions. This reassessment is facilitated through challenges or rebuttals, as outlined in Article 195 paragraph (6) HIR, Article 206 paragraph (6) Rbg, Article 378 RV, Article 279 RV, and is guided by the Ius Curia Novit principle, as affirmed in Article 10 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Power Justice. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, this study relies on secondary data to explore the nuances of execution and post-decision challenges, drawing on primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.

Article Details

How to Cite
Setyowati, R. K. (2023). The Conclusive Phase of Civil Case Resolution: Examining Execution and Post-Decision Challenges in Indonesian Civil Procedural Law. Unnes Law Journal, 9(2), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v9i2.74836
Issue
Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Contemporary Issues on Law and Development: Social, Political and Legal Aspects
Section
Research Article

References

Aziezi, Muhammad Tanziel. “Membangun Sistem Ekesekusi Putusan Perdata Yang Efektif dan Efisien”, Presentation of LeIP (Lembaga Kajian Advokasi & Independensi Peradilan), 2019. Retrieved from

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI, Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Hukum Acara Perdata, (Jakarta: BPHN, 2015).

Bauw, Eddy. "Commercial Litigation in Europe in Transformation: The Case of the Netherlands Commercial Court." Erasmus Law Review 12, no. 1 (2019): 15-23.

Condorelli, Luigi, and Luigi Sbolci. "Measures of execution against the property of foreign States: the law and practice in Italy." Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 10 (1979): 197-231.

Court Decision, Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2012.2012/PN.MBO South Jakarta District Court Nomor 67/Pdt.G/2014, 8 January 2014.

Eichstädt, Tilman. "Applying auction theory to procurement auctions–an empirical study among german corporations." Negotiation, Auctions, and Market Engineering: International Seminar, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, November 12-17, 2006, Revised Selected Papers. (Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008).

Harahap, M. Yahya. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005).

Kamelo, Tan. Hukum Perdata: Hukum Orang dan Keluarga, (Medan: USU Press, 2011).

Manan, H. Abdul. “Eksekusi dan Lelang dalam Hukum Acara Perdata”, Paper, Rakernas 2011 Mahkamah Agung dengan Pengadilan Seluruh Indonesia, Jakarta 18-22 September 2011. Available online at

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Suatu Pengantar (Yogjakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2014).

Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung, “Prosedur Eksekusi”, retrieved from

Republic of Indonesia, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, HIR (Herziene Indonesich reglement).

Republic of Indonesia, Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkuan Hidup jo. Permen LHK Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Kerugian Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Pencemaran dan/atau Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup.

Republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Republic of Indonesia. Civil Procedure Law for the Java and Madura regions, Herziene Indonesich Reglement (HIR).

Republic of Indonesia. Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (Indonesian Civil Code.

Republic of Indonesia. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2000 yang Mengatur tentang Syarat-Syarat Putusan Serta Merta.

Riyanto, R. Benny. “Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata”, Discussion Paper LeIP, 2019. Retrieved from

Sayuthi, Wildan. Sita Eksekusi Praktek Kejurusitaan Pengadilan. (Jakarta: PT Tatanusa, 2004).

Subekti, Subekti, Hukum Acara Perdata (Jakarta: BPHN, 1977).

Widowati, Widowati, and YA Triana Ohoiwutun. "Kepastian Hukum Putusan Yang Melanggar Special Straf Maxima." Jurnal Yudisial 14, no. 1 (2021): 1-18.

World Enforcement Conference of Shanghai,

Zakariyah, Robitum Maftukh, and Ahmad Riyadh U.B. “Juridical Overview Regarding the Unenforceability of Court Decisions in Civil Cases That Have Permanent Legal Force (INKRACHT): Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang tidak dapat Dilaksanakannya Putusan Pengadilan dalam Perkara Perdata yang Telah Mempunyai Kekuatan Hukum Tetap (INKRACHT)”, Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review 11 (2020): 1-7.