Analyzing Subjective Defects in a Civil Tortious Lawsuit: Inconsistencies between Posita and Petitum in the Control Assumption of the Testator’s Estate (Case No. 415/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Referring to a civil case number 415/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt, the plaintiffs who are the testator’s wife and daughter file a Tortious lawsuit against the defendant for an unlawful act. The plaintiffs describe the unlawful act as taking control of the estate by the testator sibling who has a mutual agreement between the defendant and the testator’s wife. This has happened prior to the distribution of the estate among the rightful heirs. The panel of judges who have reviewed the case in question, give a verdict of ‘an inadmissible lawsuit claim.’ The point of interest that the writers want to bring up and research on is the reason behind judges’ verdict that has made the case as a “niet onvankelijke verklaard'' case. To elaborate further, doctrinal research is done on the principles of civil procedural law, especially the relationship between the type of civil litigation with its legal arguments (‘posita’) and the legal claims (‘petitum’). The research results show that there are major inconsistencies between the type of civil litigation that has been filed with the content of ‘posita’ and ‘petitium.’ The plaintiffs file a tortious lawsuit at the district court while their ‘posita’ are mixing between undistributed testator’s estate and the defendant’s action of taking over the estate that is based on an agreement. Besides that, the legal claims have a few mix-ups, including demanding to state a tortious act by the defendant, petitioning the court to invalidate the mutual agreement, and seeking the court’s determination of heirs. In a tortious lawsuit, the plaintiffs shall seek compensation for their losses. As an advocate, it is expected to have an awareness in preparing a good and proper legal argument and claims in a civil lawsuit. These inconsistencies yield an inadmissible lawsuit; hence the plaintiff’s legal interests cannot be served through civil legal proceedings.
Article Details
References
Azis, Dudung Abdul, and Ayu Novita Sari. "Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Gugatan Obscuur Libel Dalam Sengketa BPJS." IUS FACTI: Jurnal Berkala Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Karno 1, no. 1 (2022): 62-73.
Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001).
Fakhriah, Efa Laela. Bukti Elektronik dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2017).
Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008).
Heriyani, Endang, and Prihati Yuniarlin. "Perlindungan Hukum bagi Ahli Waris yang Tidak Hadir (Afwezig) dalam Pembagian Harta Warisan di DIY." Transparansi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2019): 17-30.
Hulu, Klaudius Ilkam, and Dalinama Telaumbanua. "Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Warisan Yang Diperoleh Melalui Harta Peninggalan Orang Tua." Jurnal Panah Keadilan 1, no. 2 (2022): 52-61.
Kholek, Abdul, and Alfitri Alfitri. "Sue for Disputes Resolution of Land Conflict in South Sumatera." Komunitas 9, no. 1 (2017): 161-169.
Main, Thomas O. "The procedural foundation of substantive law." Washington University Law Review 87, no.4 (2010): 801-842.
Manangin, Muhamad Syaifullah Abadi, Leni Dwi Nurmala, and Nurmin K. Martam. "Pengalihan Atas Harta Warisan di Indonesia." DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 2 (2020): 177-270.
Mantili, Rai, and Samantha Aulia Lubis. "Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Terhadap Gugatan Perceraian Yang Tidak Dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) dalam Praktik." ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 3, no. 1 (2018): 111-134.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1998).
Moechthar, Oemar. "Kedudukan Negara Sebagai Pengelola Warisan Atas Harta Peninggalan Tak Terurus Menurut Sistem Waris Burgerlijk Wetboek." Yuridika 32, no. 2 (2017): 280-309.
Muliyati, Muliyati, and Akmaluddin Syahputra. "Analisis Putusan Nomor: 2508/Pdt. G/2022/PA. Mdn Mengenai Pembagian Harta Warisan Terhadap Ahli Waris dalam Gugatan Kabur (Abscruur Libels)." UNES Law Review 5, no. 4 (2023): 3834-3845.
Nugraha, Xavier, John Eno Prasito Putra, and Krisna Darari Hamonangan Putra. "Analisa Daluarsa Gugatan Pembatalan Perjanjian Akibat Adanya Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheiden)." Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 8, no. 1 (2020): 54-72.
Oemarsalim, Oemarsalim. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Waris di Indonesia (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008).
Pai’pin, Hamzah, Sufirman Rahman, and Salle Salle. "Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Menyatakan Gugatan Penggugat Tidak Dapat Diterima." Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) 3, no. 4 (2022): 617-633.
Patma, Patma, Suwarti Suwarti, and Nam Rumkel. "Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Yang Dilakukan Oleh Ahli Waris Terhadap Harta Warisan Yang Belum Dibagi." Hermeneutika: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2021): 353-363.
Permatasari, Elfira, Habib Adjie, and Hardianto Djanggih. "Perlindungan Hukum Kepemilikan Tanah Absentee yang Diperoleh Akibat Pewarisan." Varia Justicia 14, no. 1 (2018): 1-9.
Prabowo, Setio, M. Sudirman, and Cicilia Julyani Tondy. "Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Ahli Waris Terhadap Harta Warisan Yang Beralih Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris." Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik 1, no. 3 (2023): 63-70.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Hukum Warisan di Indonesia. (Bandung: Sumur Bandung, 1995).
Republic of Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Indonesian Civil Code].
Salim HS, Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005).
Saptomo, Ade. Pokok-Pokok Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Empris Murni (Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, 2009).
Sari, Indah. "Pembagian Hak Waris Kepada Ahli Waris Ab Intestato dan Testamentair Menurut Hukum Perdata Barat (BW)." Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 5, no. 1 (2018): 1-20.
Satrio, J. Hukum Perikatan Pada Umumnya, (Bandung, Alumni, 1993).
Silviana, Ana. "Kajian Tentang Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat dalam Melaksanakan Pendaftaran Tanah." Pandecta Research Law Journal 7, no. 1 (2012): 112-122.
Subagyono, Bambang Sugeng Ariadi, Johan Wahyudi, and Razky Akbar. "Kajian Penerapan Asas Ultra Petita Pada Petitum Ex Aequo Et Bono." Yuridika 29, no. 1 (2014): 100-112.
Subekti, Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata (Jakarta: Intermasa, 2008).
Suryaningtyas, Agustina. "Pelaksanaan Pembagian Warisan Berdasarkan KUHPerdata Berkenaan Dengan Adanya Testamen." Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 265-270.
Sutantio, Retnowulan, and Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2022).
Sutiyoso, Bambang. "Pemihakan Hakim Terhadap Keadilan Substantif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah." Jurnal Yudisial 5, no. 3 (2012): 298-315.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. Hukum Acara Perdata Khusus di Indonesia (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2020).
Syahrani, Riduan. Seluk-Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata (Bandung: Alumni, 2004).
Syamsudin, Muhammad. "Keadilan Prosedural dan Substantif dalam Putusan Sengketa Tanah Magersari." Jurnal Yudisial 7, no. 1 (2014): 18-33.
Tambi, Muhamad Faisal. "Studi Komparasi Pembagian Warisan Menurut Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat." Lex Privatum 6, no. 9 (2019): 44-51.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan. Pengantar Hukum Perdata di Indonesia, (Jakarta, Prestasi Pustaka, 2006).
Umam, Khotibul. Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2010).
Wahanisa, Rofi, et al. "Problems of Disputes/Conflicts Over Land Acquisition Towards Development dor Public Interest in Indonesia." International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10 (2021): 320-325.
Wahyuni, Willa. “Memahami Hukum Pidana Formil dan Sumber Hukumnya”, Online Article HukumOnline, 17 February, 2022. Retrieved from
Wahyuni, Yenny Sri. "Pencabutan Petitum Pada Perkara Cerai Talak (Analisis Putusan Hakim Nomor 217/Pdt. G/2020/Ms-Bna)." El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 4, no. 2 (2021): 295-327.
Wulandari, Dian Agustina. "Pengelolaan Administrasi Tanah Aset Pemerintah Guna Mendapatkan Kepastian Hukum." Unnes Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2015): 94-106.