KORELASI PENGUASAAN MATERI MATEMATIKA DASAR DENGAN PENGUASAAN MATERI PENDAHULUAN FISIKA INTI

C. T. Kereh(1), Liliasari -(2), P. C. Tjiang(3), J. Sabandar(4),


(1) Jln. Putuhena Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, SPS - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
(3) Program Studi Fisika, FTIS, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung, Indonesia
(4) Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, SPS - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Perkuliahan Pendahuluan Fisika Inti (PFI) di Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika di suatu LPTK di Ambon terkendala oleh kurangnya penguasaan matematika dasar mahasiswa, juga tenaga dosen dan ruangan jumlahnya terbatas. Salah satu upaya yang dilakukan untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut di atas, maka dilakukan perkuliahan berbasis web dengan memperhatikan matematika dasar terkait. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tentang: (1) konten matematika dasar yang berkaitan langsung dengan materi PFI, dan (2) korelasi antara penguasaan materi Matematika Dasar (MD) mahasiswa dan penguasaan materi PFI mereka setelah melalui suatu perkuliahan. Studi ini dilakukan secara kuasi eksperimen terhadap dua kelompok mahasiswa, masing-masing berjumlah 28 orang. Kelompok yang pertama diajarkan dengan menggunakan perkuliahan konvensional dengan tatap muka di dalam kelas selama delapan kali pertemuan sedangkan kelompok kedua menggunakan blended learning. Pada kedua kelompok mahasiswa dilakukan tes awal dan tes akhir materi MD dan PFI. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada korelasi yang tinggi antara penguasaan materi Matematika Dasar dengan materi Pendahuluan Fisika Inti.

ABSTRACT

Nuclear Physics Introduction (NPI) is a course in Physics Education Program in a teacher education program in Ambon. It had been constrained by the lack of students’ mastery on basic mathematics. Moreover, the number of lecturers and rooms were limited. In order to overcome the problems, a web based NPI course had been carried out. The aims of this research were to know: (1) which mathematics contents related to NPI and (2) the correlation between students’ mastery on basic mathematics and their mastery on NPI. This study was conducted in a quasi-experimental design. There were two groups consisted of 28 students in each group. The first group had been taught by direct instruction, and the second by blended learning. There were administered a pre-test and a post-test of basic mathematics and NPI for both groups. The results showed that there was a strong correlation between students’ mastery on basic mathematics and their mastery on Nuclear Physics Introduction.

Keywords

korelasi matematika dasar dan fisika inti; pembelajaran berbasis web

Full Text:

PDF

References

Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but Fun, Pupils and Teachers Views of Physics and Physics Teaching [Electronic version]. Science Education, 88, 683-706.

Blumenthal, R. H. (1961). Multiple Instruction and Other Factors Related to Achievement in College Physics. Science Education, 45, 336–342

Brekelmans, M., Van den Eeden, P., Terwel, J., & Wubbels, Th. (1997). Student Characteristics and Learning Environment Interactions in Mathematics and Physics Education: A Resource Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 283–292.

Bybee, R.W., & Fuch, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st Century Workforce: A New Reform In Science and Technology Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 349.

Bynner, J., & Parsons, S. (1997). It Doesn’t Get Any Better: The Impact of Poor Numeracy Skills on the Lives of 37-Year-Olds. London: Basic Skills Agency.

Cohen H. D., Hillman, D. F., & Agne, R. M. (1978). Cognitive Level and College Physics Achievement. American Journal of Physics, 46, 1026–1029.

Diseth. A. (2002). The Relationship between Intelligence, Approaches to Learning and Academic Achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(2).

Ebel, R. L,. & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essensials of Educational Measurerement, 5th Ed. New Delhi: Prentice Hall.

Garnett, K. (1998). Math Learning Disabilities. Division for Learning Disabilities Journal of CEC, November 1998. LD Online. http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/math_skills/garnett.html [1 Juni 2013]

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2007). Fundamentals of Physics 8th Ed. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Canada.

Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The Initial Knowledge State of College Physics Students. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1043–1055.

Hudson H. T., & McIntire W. R. (1977). Correlation Between mathematical skills and success in physics. American Journal of Physics, 45, 470–471.

Hudson, H. T., & Rottmann, R. M. (1981). Correlation between Performance in Physics and Prior Mathematics Knowledge. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 18(4), 291-294

Inman, W. C., & Secrest, B. T. (1981). Piaget’s Data and Spearman’s Theory An Empirical Reconciliation and Its Implications for Academic Achievement. Intelligence, 5, 329-344

Kazemi, F, Shahmohammadi, A., & Sharei, M. (2013).The Survey on Relationship between the Attitude and Academic Achievement of In-Service Mathematics Teachers in Introductory Probability and Statistics. World Applied Sciences Journal 22(7), 886-891.

Lang, H. (2009). Head First Physics. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Li, L. K.Y. (2012). A Study of the Attitude, Self-efficacy, Effort and Academic Achievement of City U Students towards Research Methods and Statistics. Discovery – SS Student E-Journal, 1, 154-183

McGeorge, P., Crawford, J. R., & Kelly, S. W. (1997). The Relationships Between Psychometric Intelligence and Learning An Explicit and An Implicit Task. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(1), 239-245

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible ‘‘Hidden Variable’’ In Diagnostic Pretest Scores. American Journal of Physics, 70 ~12. Retrieved from http://ojps.aip.org/ajp/

Mohamed, L., & Waheed. (2011). Secondary Students’ Attitude towards Mathematics in a Selected School of Maldives. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(15).

Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., and Haugan, M. P. (2008). What makes physics difficult? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(1), 30-34.

Quale, A. (2011). On the Role of Mathematics in Physics: A Constructivist Epistemic Perspective. Science and Education, 20, 609-624

Redish, E. F. (1994). The Implications of Cognitive Studies for Teaching Physics. American Journal of Physics, 62, 796-803.

Sirin, S. (2005). Socialeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453

Thorndike, A. (1946). Correlation Between Physics And Mathematics Grades. School Science and Mathematics, 46(7), 593-690

Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social Competence at School: Relation between Social Responsibility and Academic Achievement. Review of Educational Research 61, 1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License