THE DEVELOPMENT OF EARTH QUAKE TEACHING MATERIAL FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BY FOUR STEP TEACHING MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT METHOD

S. Hendri(1), W. Setiawan(2),


(1) Program Studi Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Ilmu Komputer, Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Abstract

The aim of this study is to developed a science teaching material for students on junior high school. The theme of this material are the earthquake phenomenon as the main subject are displayed integratedly into various concepts of science knowledge such as earth science, physics, biology and technology. This study is Research and Development study that developing teaching materials by using The Four Step Teaching Materials Development. The four steps on developing a teaching material which are selection, structurisation, characterization, and didactic reduction process. The final product of this steps is hand out wich titled “Belajar Sains Melalui Fenomena Gempa Bumi (Learning Science through the earth quake phenomenon)”. Then, the teaching materials is tested to get information about concepts indentification, eligibility, and student’s understanding. This study showed that most of the concepts on this teaching material are quite easy with the correct written main ideas above 75% and the students understanding toward this hand out are falls on good category.  Beside that, this hand out are  validated in four aspects, which are content, material presentment, language & grammar, and grafis.The result stated that the hand out is feasible for use in learning.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan bahan ajar materi ilmu pengetahuan alam bagi siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Bahan ajar ini mengangkat tema fenomena bencana gempa bumi sebagai pokok pembahasan utama yang mengintegrasikan  ilmu kebumian, fisika, biologi dan teknologi. Penelitian ini merupakan bagian dari Research and Development, yaitu mengembangkan bahan ajar menggunakan metode Four Step Teaching Materials Development (4STMD). 4STMD memiliki empat tahapan pengembangan bahan ajar, yaitu proses seleksi, proses strukturisasi, proses karakterisasi, dan proses reduksi didaktis. Produk akhir dari pengolahan bahan ajar ini berjudul “Belajar Sains Melalui Fenomena Gempa Bumi”. Pengujian terhadap bahan ajar dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi konsep sulit, menilai kelayakan bahan ajar, dan keterpahaman siswa terhadap bahan ajar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebagian besar konsep-konsep materi yang terdapat pada bahan ajar tergolong konsep mudah, dengan persentase penulisan ide pokok benar diatas 75% dan kualifikasi pemahaman siswa terhadap bahan ajar dikategorikan baik. Hasil penilaian kelayakan bahan ajar dinyatakan bahwa bahan ajar ini layak untuk digunakan dalam pembelajaran.

Keywords

development, teaching materials, science in junior high school, 4STMD

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adisendjaja, Y. (2010). Analisis Buku Ajar Biologi SMA Kelas X di Kota Bandung Berdasarkan Literasi Sains. Dipetik Desember 11, 2014, dari Direktori File UPI: http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._BIOLOGI/195512191980021-YUSUF_HILMI_ADISENDJAJA/analisis_buku_ajar_berdasarkan_literasi_sains__HSL_LIT_.pdf

Ali, M. (2011). Memahami Riset Perilaku dan Sosial. Bandung: Pustaka Cendekia Utama.

Allwright, R. (1981). What do We Want Teaching Materials for? ELT Journal, Vol. 36 (1):5.

Antle, A., Wise, A., & Nielsen, K. (2011). Towards Utopia: Designing Tangibles for Learnig. IDC, 11-20.

Anwar, S. (2014). Pengolahan Bahan Ajar. Bahan Perkuliahan Pengolahan Bahan Ajar SPS UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.

Arifin. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Pada Tema Udara Berbasis Nilai Religius Menggunakan 4 Steps Teaching Material Development. Bandung: Tesis Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UPI (Tidak diterbitkan).

Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kemenag RI.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penilaian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bialek, W., & Botstein, D. (2004). Introductory Science and Mathematics Education for 21st-Century Biologist. Science, Vol. 303: 789.

BNPB. (2007). Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. Dipetik Maret 31, 2015, dari Badan Nasional Penganggulangan Bencana: www.bnpb.go.id/uploads/migration/pubs/1.pdf

Borrero, F., Hess, F., Hsu, J., Kunze, G., Leslie, S., Letro, S., et al. (2008). Earth Science: Geology, the Environment, and the Universe. USA: Glencoe.

Chiapetta, E., Fillman, D., & Sethna, G. (1993). Do Middle School Life Secience Textbooks Provide a Balance of Scientific Literacy Themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 28 (7): 787.

Dahar, R. (2011). Teori-Teori Belajar & Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Depdiknas. (2010). Juknis Pengembangan Bahan Ajar SMA. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.

Harrel, P. (2010). Teaching an Integrated Science Curriculum: LInking Teacher Knowledge and Teching Assignments. Issues in Teacher Education, Spring, Vol. 19(1):146.

Hewitt, P. L. (2013). Conceptual Integrated Science 2nd Edition. USA: Pearson.

Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The Textbook as Agent of Change. ELT Journal, Vol. 48: 315-323.

Johnstone, R., & Jougnin, G. (1997). Designing Print Materials for Flexible Teaching and Learning in Law. Sydney: Cavendish Publishing (Australia) Pty Limited. hal. 2-34.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Pedoman Kegiatan Pendampingan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Bagi Pengawas Sekolah, Kepala Sekolah dan Guru Inti. Jakarta: Pusbang Tendik.

Lamanauskas, V. (2010). Integrated Science Education in The Context of The Constructivism Theory: Some Important Issues. Problem of Education in The 21th Century, Vol. 25: 5-9.

Lawshe, C. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 567.

Liliawati, W., Rustaman, N., Herdiwijaya, D., & Rusdiana, D. (2013). Efektivitas Perkuliahan IPBA Terintegrasi Berbasis Kecerdasan Majaemuk untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Menanamkan Karakter Diri Mahasiswa Calon Guru SMP pada Tema Tata Surya. Indonesian Journal of Applied Physics, 63-71.

Littejohn, A. (2011). The Analysis of Language Teaching Materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. hal. 179-211.

Liu, E., Cheng, S., & Lin, C. (2008). The Development of Evaluation Indicators for LEGO Multimedia Instructional Material. WSEAS Transaction on Computers, Vol. 7: 1783.

Mulyono, P. (2007, Januari). Kegiatan Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Buletin BSNP, Vol. II (1):21.

Nurul, G. (2013). Edukasi Kompasiana. Dipetik Desember 1, 2014, dari Menyiapkan Bahan Ajar Sesuai Dengan Tingkat Berpikir Siswa: http://edukasi.kompasiana.com/2013/01/14/menyiapkan-bahan-ajar-sesuai-dengan-tingkat-berpikir-siswa-519134.html

Ranjit, S. (2007). Asia-Pasific Cultural Center for UNESCO. Dipetik September 30, 30 , dari How to Develop and Produce Simple Learning Materials with Limited Resources at Comunity Level: http://www.accu.or.jp/litdbase/pub/dlperson/pdf0106/rpp25.pdf

Reiser, B., Krajick, J., Moje, E., & Marx, R. (2003). Design Strategies for Developing Science Instructional Materials. Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, 1-20.

Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suparno, P. (2001). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design. Learning and Instruction., Vol. 4: 295-312.

Syatriana, E., Husain, D., Haryanto, & Jabu, B. (2013). A Model of Creating Instructional Materials Based on School Curriculum for Indonesian Secondary Schools. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 4(2): 10-16.

Taylor, J., Scotter, P., & Coulson, D. (2007). Bridging Research on Learning and Student Achievement: The Role of Instructional Materials. Science Educator, Vol. 16: 44-50.

Wiguna, F. (2014). Kajian Teoritik Tahap Strukturisasi Pengolahan Bahan Ajar 4S-TMD Dilihat dari Aspek Filosofis, Aspek Psikologis, Aspek Didaktis dan Aplikasinya Pada Pokok Bahasan Larutan Asam Basa. Bandung: Tesis Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UPI (Tidak diterbitkan).

Wilson, F., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. (2012). Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, XX(X):10.

Wisudawati, A., & Sulistyowati, E. (2014). Metodologi Pembelajaran IPA. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Yanti, H., Rustaman, N., & Setiawan, W. (2008). Strategi Baru dalam Pengolahan Bahan Ajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (Hasil Kajian Terhadap Teori Reduksi Didaktik dan Pedagogi Materi Subyek). Edusains, Vol. 1(1): 26-38.

Refbacks





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License