Improving Law Student Ability on Legal Writing through Critical and Logical Thinking by IRAC Method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The lack of good stigma is attached to student activists, ranging from the unsatisfactory level of academic quality, graduating on time, not responsive and very reactive, hard and opposing views, to demonstrations that are colored by violence. The stigma is only in a few cases, not all activists face such conditions, but this stigma seems to have been far attached. The development of student activists today demands that activists must also have three literacy abilities: data literacy, humanitarian literacy, and technological literacy. However, based on the preliminary results of this activity, 90 percent of UNNES Law School student activists agreed that activists must have a critical attitude and critical writing skills, but only about 10 percent of activists who had taken it seriously (thought publications in various forms). This activity is aimed at developing the critical abilities of student activists through increased publications in various media. This activity also aims to establish a critical writing community for student activists and present a concrete forum for channeling ideas and solutions for student activists in writing that can be read by many people. This activity is carried out through a critical thinking approach in legal studies using the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) method which is commonly used in analyzing various cases in legal study thinking.
Article Details
The Authors(s) retain copyrights of the Article published on Indonesian J. Advoc. Legal Serv. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
References
Anonim. (2018). Tanggapan Rektor Unnes soal Demo Mahasiswa yang Berujung Ricuh. Liputan 6 edition 8 June, retrieved from https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/3554192/tanggapan-rektor-unnes-soal-demo-mahasiswa-yang-berujung-ricuh
Barr, F. D., & Harta, I. (2016). ‘Analisis Manajemen Waktu Organisasi dan Kuliah Aktivis Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta’. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, IX(1), 280-285. retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21484
Budi, T. (2018). Demo Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Semarang Tolak Uang Pangkal Berujung Rusuh. OKEZONE edition 7 June, retrieved from https://news.okezone.com/read/2018/06/07/512/1908011/demo-mahasiswa-universitas-negeri-semarang-tolak-uang-pangkal-berujung-rusuh
DiPipi-Hoy, C., Jitendra, A. K., & Kern, L. (2009). ‘Effects of Time Management Instruction on Adolescents Ability to Self-Manage Time in a Vocational Setting’. The Journal of Special Education, 43(3), 145-159.
Feist, J. & Feist, G.J. (2010). Teori Kepribadian. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Herawati, L. (2017). ‘Budaya Literasi Media dalam Meningkatkan Daya Baca Mahasiswa IAIN Cirebon’. Paedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(2), 294-309.
Septiani, P. (2016). ‘Orientasi Karakter Perilaku Aktivis Mahasiswa (Character Orientation of Students Activist Behavior)’. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Bimbingan dan Konseling, 5(12), 636-646. retrieved from http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fipbk/article/viewFile/6248/6000
Oley, P.C. (2013). ‘Perilaku Politik Aktivis Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sam Ratulangi (Suatu Studi Terhadap Pengurus Organisasi Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sam Ratulangi Tahun 2012)’. Jurnal Politico, 1(3), 31-41. retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/politico/article/view/2514/2050
Pranoto, N. (2010). ‘Sekilas Academic Writing: Proses dan Permasalahannya (Bagian 1)’. Online, edition 15 March 2010, retrieved from https://rayakultura.net/sekilas-academic-writingproses-dan-permasalahannya/
Susan, N. (2009). Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu-isu Konflik Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sugiyarto. (2018). Demo Mahasiswa Unnes Menolak Uang Pangkal Dilanjutkan Menginap di Depan Rektorat. TRIBUNNEWS edition 5 June, retrieved from http://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2018/06/05/demo-mahasiswa-unnes-menolak-uang-pangkal-dilanjutkan-menginap-di-depan-rektorat
Lestari, S., & Chasanatun, T.W. (2016). ‘Analisis Kompetensi dan Permasalahandalam Menulis Artikel Pada Mata Kuliah Academic Writing’. Jurnal LPPM, 4(1), 76-84.
Tawakal, I. (2015). Kritis Pada Diri Mahasiswa, Untuk Perubahan. Kompasiana, edition 15 June, retrieved from https://www.kompasiana.com/tautawtau/550b3ec3a33311b0142e39e1/kritis-pada-diri-mahasiswa-untuk-perubahan
Wae, W. (2014). Membangun Sikap Kritis. Opini Online OKEZONE, edition 1 December, retrieved from https://news.okezone.com/read/2014/12/01/65/1072809/membangun-sikap-kritis
Widiarto, A. (2018). Ratusan Mahasiswa Unnes Demo Tolak Uang Pangkal. Suara Merdeka, edition 4 June, retrieved from https://www.suaramerdeka.com/news/baca/92227/ratusan-mahasiswa-unnes-demo-tolak-uang-pangkal
Wigati, F.A. (2014). ‘Kesulitan Pada Aspek-Aspek Writing Mahasiswa dengan English Proficiency Levels yang Berbeda’. Jurnal Ilmiah Solusi, 1(3), 46-61.
Yamin, M. (2018). ‘Kebijakan Literasi Untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas Publikasi di Perguruan Tinggi’. Jurnal Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi, 2(1), 19-26.