Keywords
student motivation
STAD model
How to Cite
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji perbedaan hasil belajar matematika dan motivasi belajar siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif handep dan tipe STAD. Sampel penelitian adalah siswa kelas tujuh VII SMPN-1 Palangkaraya. Hipotesis penelitian diuji dengan uji-t dan uji U Mann-Whitney pada taraf kepercayaan 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (a) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif handep lebih tinggi dari STAD, dan (b) tidak ada perbedaan motivasi belajar pada siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif handep dan STAD.
This study purpose examined the differences in mathematics learning outcomes and students' motivation to learn the cooperative learning model handep and STAD. The samples is seventh grade students of SMPN-1 Palangkaraya. The research hypotheses were tested by t-test and Mann-Whitney test. The research results are (a) the learning outcomes of students who are learning mathematics with cooperative learning model handep higher than STAD, and (b) there was no difference in the students' motivation to learn in cooperative learning model handep higher than STAD.
Â
References
Barron, B. dan Hammond, L.D. 2015. Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Le-arning. Edutopia. (Online), (http://-www.edutopia.org, diakses tanggal 6 Januari 2015).
Bunu, H.Y. 2012. Pendidikan dalam Konstruksi Masyarakat Suku Dayak Ot Danum: Kajian Fenomenologi di Kabupaten Gunung Mas Kalimantan Tengah. Su-rabaya: Jenggala Pustaka Utama.
Carlan, V.G., Rubin, R. dan Morgan, B.M. 2015. Cooperative Learning, Mathema-tical Problem Solving, and Latinos. (Online), (email: [email protected], diakses tanggal 6 Januari 2015.
Daniel, W.W. 1989. Statistika Nonparametrik Terapan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Demitra, Sarjoko, dan Uda, S.K. 2010. Deve-lopment of Handep Cooperative Le-arning Model Through Small Group Test in Biology Learning. Proceeding5th International Seminar of Science Education, pp. 24.1-24.17.
Demitra, Sarjoko, dan Uda, S.K. 2011. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Handep. Ma-lang: UM Press.
Demitra, Sarjoko, dan Uda, S.K. 2012. Peng-embangan Model Pembelajaran Ko-operatif Handep dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 19(1), April 2012, pp. 15-27.
Demitra. 2013. Pengembangan Modul Statis-tika Dasar untuk Mahasiswa PG-MIPA-BI. ProsidingSeminar NasionalMatematika dan Pendidikan Matema-tika FMIPA UNY diYogyakarta, tang-gal 9 November 2013.
Fitrihidayati, H., Susantini, E., dan Indah, N.K. 2010. Implementasi of Biology Material Resource Based on Coope-rative Learning Student Team Achi-evement Division (STAD) Type to Improve Critical Thinking Skills in Sejahtera High School of Surabaya. Proceeding5th International Seminar of Science Education, pp. 27.1-27.8.
Hiebert, J. 1986. Conceptual and Prosedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematic. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates Publishers.
Hiebert, J. & Leferve, P. 1986. Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathema-tics: An Introductory Analysis. Editor Hiebert, J. Conceptual and Procedural Knowlegde: The Case of Mathematics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum As-sociates.
Hill, S. Dan Hill, T. 1993. The Collaborative Classroom: A Guide to Cooperative Learning. Armadale Vic: Eleanur Curtain Publishing.
Hossain, A., Tarmizi, R.A., dan Ayub, A.F. 2012. Collaborative and Cooperative Learning in Malaysian Mathematics Education, Journal Mathematics Edu-cation IndoMS, (Online), Volume 3, No. 2, (http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/in-dex.php/jme, diakses tanggal 7 Feb-ruari 2015.
Jacob, G.M., Lee, G.S., dan Ball, J. 1996. Learning Cooperative Via Cooperative Learning. Singapore: SEAMEO Regi-onal Language Center Singapore.
Johnson, A. W., & Johnson, R. (2002). Co-operative Learning Methods: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Edu-cation, 12(1), 5-14.
Karmana, I.W. 2011. Strategi Pembelajaran, Kemampuan Akademik, Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah, dan Hasil Bela-jar Biologi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 17 (5): 378-386.
Lie, A. 2002. Cooperative Learning: Mem-praktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang-ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Grame-dia.
Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J. dan Pollock, J.E. 2001. Classroom Instruction, That Works Research Based Strategies for Increasing Achievement. Alexandria, V.A.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mubyarto. 1993. Desa-desa Kalimantan: Studi Bina Desa Pedalaman Kalimantan Tengah. Yogyakarta; Aditya Media.
Murdiyani, N.M., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I. Van Eerde, D., dan Van Eerde, F. 2013. De-veloping a Model to Support Students in Solving Subtraction. Journal Ma-thematics Education IndoMS, (On-line), Volume 4, No. 1, (http://ejour-nal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme, diakses tanggal 26 Januari 2015.
Reys, R.E., Suydam, M.N., dan Lindquist, M.M. 1998. Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Schoenfeld, A. 1980. Heuristic in The Class-room. Editor Krulik, S. dan Reys, R.E. ProblemSolving in The School Mathe-matics.
Sarjoko. 2003. Implementasi Model IMPROVE dalam Pembelajaran Pangkat Rasional dengan Setting Kooperatif di SMAN-2 Palangkaraya. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPS Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sarjoko dan Demitra. 2013. Studi Mendalam Dampak Instruksional Model Pembe-lajaran Kooperatif Handep dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di SMAN-3 Palangkaraya. Laporan penelitian. Palangkaraya: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Palangkaraya.
Sarjoko dan Rhodinus. 2007. Pengembangan Lembar Kerja dengan strategi perta-nyaan metakognisi untuk pembela-jaran teknik pengintegralan bagi ma-hasiswa peserta matakuliah Kalkulus II di Program Studi Pendidikan Mate-matika FKIP Universitas Palangkara-ya. Laporan Penelitian. Palangkaraya: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Pa-langkaraya.
Slavin, R.E. 2008. Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Slavin, R.E. 2015. Instruction Based on Co-operative Learning. (Online), (icces-ForAll/media/PDFs/Instrution-Based-on Cooperative-Learning-09-24-09.pdf, diakses tanggal 6 Januari 2015).
Sharan, S. 2012. The Handbook of Cooperative Learning: Inovasi Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran untuk Memacu Keber-hasilan Siswa di Kelas. Terjemahan Sigit Pranowo. Yogyakarta: Familia.
Sujana. 2005. Metoda statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sriyati, L.M, Dantes, N., dan Candiasa, I.M. 2014. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XII IPA SMA Negeri 2 Semarapura, Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, (On line), Volume 4, (http://pas-ca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/in-dex.php/jurnal_ep, diakses tanggal 26 Januari 2015).
Sweller, J. 1989. Cognitive Technology Some Procedure for Facilitating Learning and Problem Solving in Mathematics and Science. Journal for Educational Psychology, 81(4), pp. 457-466.
Tran, V.D. 2014. The Effect of Cooperative Learning on The Academic Achieve-ment and Knowledge Retention. In-ternational Journal of Higher Educa-tion, (Online), Jilid 3, No.2, (http://-www.sciedu.ca/ijhe, diakses tanggal 5 Februari 2015).
Wahyuni, A. dan Abadi, A.M. 2014. Perban-dingan Keefektifan Pembelajaran Cooperative Learning Tipe STAD dan TPS pada Pembelajaran Bangun Ru-ang Siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidi-kan Matematika, (Online), Volume 1, No.2, (http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/issue/view/392/showToc, diakses tanggal 26 Januari 2015.
Wilson, B.G. dan Cole, P. 1996. Cognitive Teaching Models. Editor Johnassen, D.H. Handbook of Research for Edu-cational Communication and Techno-logy. London: Prentice Hall Internati-onal.
Wiske, M.S. dan Beatty, B.J. 2009. Fostering Understanding Outcomes. Editor Re-igeluth C.M. dan Cheliman, A.A.C. Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Know-ledge Base Volume III. New York: Tay-lor and Francis, Publishers.
Yildirim, S. dan Ersözlü, Z.N. 2013. The Re-lationship Between Student Metacog-nitive and Their Solutions to Similar Types of Mathematical Problems. Eu-rasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and technology Education. (Online), Jilid 9, No.4, (http://www.ejmste.com/arsivAyrinti.aspx?kim=20, diakses tanggal 3 Februari 2015).