Optimizing Intellectual Property as a Fiduciary Security Object After the Issuance of Governmental Regulation No. 24 of 2022
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The issuance of Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 2022 on the Executory Regulation of Law no. 24 of 2019 on Creative Economy has become a zephyr for creative economy actors with regard to intellectual property-collateralized financing schemes for their businesses. The regulation also further reinforces intellectual property ownership as a standalone fiduciary object that should no longer be viewed as supplementary collateral. This paper aims to study the optimization of governmental regulation on the creative economy with respect to intellectual property-collateralized financing. To this end, a normative legal method was applied by focusing on the secondary data. The research topic was scrutinized following the prevailing regulation and relevant literature. With the issuance of Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 2022 Creative Economy, it further strengthens the ownership status of intellectual property rights as objects of material guarantees. Every citizen, especially creative economy actors, can apply for business capital loans, which can be used as collateral objects and can be classified in the form of intellectual property which must be registered or registered with the Director General of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights. This consequence has an impact on the establishment of an intellectual property appraisal institution that has the task of evaluating intellectual property that will be used as collateral.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
References
Dharmawan, D. N. K. (2016). Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Deepbulish.
Djuhamma, M. (2000). Hukum Perbankan Indonesia. Pt. Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Dwi, E., Kepala, T., Bank, P., Provinsi, I., & Barat, S. (n.d.). Peran Bank Indonesia Dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif.
Etty, Dwiputri, F. A., Program, B., Kenotariatan, S. M., Padjadjaran, U., & Penulis, K. (2018). ACTA DIURNAL. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke- Ppat-An, 1(2), 136. http://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jad/issue/archive
Fakhri Ali, M., Doni Triono, D., & Keuangan Negara STAN, P. (2021). Literatur Review Penilaian Kekayaan Intelektual: Berdasarkan Buku Intellectual Property Karya Gordon Dan Russell. Jurnal indonesia Rich, 2(2), 29.
Freddy Harris, D. (2020). Modul KI-Lat untuk Pemula Hak Cipta, Merek, Desain Industri, & Paten, Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum & Hak Asasi Manusia R.I. DGiP.go.id.
Haryo Limanseto. (2022). Pemerintah Dorong Optimalisasi Pertumbuhan Industri Kreatif Indonesia. Biro Komunikasi, Layanan Informasi, dan Persidangan Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian. https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/3593/pemerintah-dorong-optimalisasi-pertumbuhan-industri-kreatif- indonesia.
Imanyanti, N. S. (2002). Hukum Ekonomi dan Ekonomi Islam. CV. Mandar Maju.
Johannes Ibrahim. (2004). Cross Collateral & Cross Default Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah. Refika Aditya.
Lawrence M. friedman. (2009). Sistem Hukum, Prespektif Ilmu Sosial. Nusa Media.
Palupi, T., Pusat, K., Keahlian, P. B., Ri, D., Mpr, K., Dpr, /, Dpd, /, Nusantara, G., Lantai, I., Gatot, J. J., & Jakarta, S. (2017). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Intellectual Property As Banking Credit Guarantee. www.ipos.gov.sg/,
Putri, I. S., & Wahyuningsih, D. D. (2021). Peran Ekonomi Kreatif Dalam Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Masyarakat Di Desa Wisata Rotan Trangsan, Gatak, Kabupaten Sukoharjo. In Global Financial Accounting Journal (Vol. 05, Nomor 01).
Rachmadi Usman. (2009). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Sinar Grafika.
Setianingrum, R. B. (2017). Mekanisme Penentuan Nilai Appraisal Dan Pengikatan Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 23(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2016.0083.229-238
Sobana, D. H. (2016). Hukum Perbankan Indonesia. Pustaka Mulia.
Sudjana. (2022). Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual. Universitas Terbuka.
Sulasno, S. (2018). Penerapan Kekayaan Intelektual (KI) Terhadap Umkm Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Persaingan Bisnis Berkeadilan. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v2i2.958
Sumampouw, W., Kurnia, K., & Arrobi, I. R. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal de Jure, 13(11), 24–39. https://jurnal.law.uniba-bpn.ac.id/index.php/jurnaldejure/article/view/506/pdf
Supartoyo, Y. H. (2022). Arah Kebijakan dan Strategi Pemulihan Ekonomi dan Reformasi Struktural Sektor Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif. Senashtek, 976–983.
Sutra Disemadi, H., & Kang, C. (2021). Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 7(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31457
Tony, R., Direktorat, P., Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, J., Hukum, K., Ham, D., Rasuna, J., Kav, S., Jakarta, K., & Indonesia, S. (2016). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Pmk/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (The Implementation Of Legal Certain. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(2), 191.
Yulia, D. (2015). Modul Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. UnimalPerss.