Community Legal Empowerment and Local Justice Practices: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, India, Spain, and Iran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jphi.v9i2.46364Keywords:
Legal Empowerment, Penal Culture, Community-Based Justice, Legal Education, Restorative JusticeAbstract
The relationship between formal justice systems and community-based justice remains critical to strengthening access to justice and legal empowerment across diverse socio-legal contexts. Penal culture, characterized by an emphasis on punishment, deterrence, and formal enforcement, may constrain community participation and limit restorative and participatory approaches to justice. This article examines how penal culture influences community legal empowerment and local justice practices through a comparative socio-legal analysis of Indonesia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, India, Spain, and Iran. The study focuses on three interrelated dimensions: legal education and awareness, community assistance and capacity building, and community-based mechanisms for preventing and resolving disputes. Using a comparative case-based approach, the study analyzes interactions between formal legal institutions and local justice practices, including customary dispute resolution, community mediation, legal aid, and paralegal initiatives. The findings reveal a common tension across the five jurisdictions between formal enforcement and community expectations of accessible, responsive, and legitimate justice, despite differences in legal traditions and socio-cultural contexts. Legal education, community assistance, and capacity building can strengthen community participation and improve the ability of local actors to navigate formal and informal justice mechanisms. The study argues that community legal empowerment requires a shift from predominantly punitive approaches toward participatory, restorative, and people-centred justice. By identifying common patterns and contextual differences, this comparative analysis contributes to socio-legal scholarship and provides practical insights for developing more inclusive community-based justice systems.
References
Arifin, Ridwan, et al. “The International Law Principle for People with Disabilities: Analyzing Access to Justice.” Unnes Law Journal 7, no. 2 (2021): 371-404.
Atashi Golestani, H., Arshi, M., Vameghi, M., & Farajiha, M. (2026). Identification of restorative services of social work in juvenile proceedings from the perspective of criminal justice stakeholders in Iran: A qualitative study. Discover Psychology, 6, Article 81.
Braithwaite, John. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Chau, Bao, Benjamin Clarke, and Bambang Sugiharto. “Access to Legal Aid and Its Impact on Fair Trials in District Courts”. Indonesian Court and Justice Review 1, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.65815/q1ydm528
Council of Europe. (2018). European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ): European handbook for mediation lawmaking. Council of Europe.
Council of Europe. (2025). European judicial systems: CEPEJ evaluation report—2024 evaluation cycle. Council of Europe.
Council of Europe. Supporting mediation and alternative dispute resolution in Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Council of Europe Office in Sarajevo, 2026)..
Eunike, Karina, and Yezekiel Abharam Keanu. “Community-Based Legal Aid for Victims of Domestic Violence: A Case Study in Rural East Nusa Tenggara”. Lentera Masyarakat Hukum 2, no. 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.65815/140kyd49
Golub, Stephen. “Beyond Rule of Law Orthodoxy: The Legal Empowerment Alternative.” Rule of Law Series: Democracy and Rule of Law Project Working Paper no. 41. (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2003).
Golub, Stephen. “Legal Empowerment: Impact and Implications for the Development Community and the World Bank.” In The World Bank Legal Review: Law, Equity, and Development, vol. 2, 167–184. (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006).
Government of India. The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Act No. 39 of 1987). (Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Justice, 1987).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2012).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 tentang Bantuan Hukum. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2011).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. (Jakarta: MA RI, 2016).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. (Jakarta: MA RI, 2024).
Merry, Sally Engle. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (1988): 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638
Ministerio de Justicia. (n.d.). Mediadores e instituciones de mediación. Gobierno de España.
Ministry of Justice of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (n.d.). Free legal aid. Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
National Legal Services Authority. National Legal Services Authority (Lok Adalat) Regulations, 2009. (Government of India, 2009).
National Legal Services Authority. National Legal Services Authority (Free and Competent Legal Services) Regulations, 2010. (Government of India, 2010).
National Legal Services Authority. National Legal Services Authority (Legal Services Clinics) Regulations, 2011. (Government of India, 2011).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Making Justice Systems More Effective and People Centred: Advancing a Responsive Rule of Law. (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Framework and Good Practice Principles for People-Centred Justice. (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Toolkit for Access to Justice and People-Centred Justice Systems. (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025).
Pujiani, Resty Shelya, Mutia Azizah Aksan, and Maya Sinta. “Seeking Justice for Indonesian Children: The Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia in the Context of Criminal Justice Reform.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 4, no. 2 (2022): 259-274. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v4i2.60033
Putri, Yasmina, and Ahmadi Muqorrobin. “Climate Justice and Environmental Law: Reform or Reinforcement of Inequality”. Indonesian Climate Justice Review 1 , no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.65815/8wqsmv71
Rochman, Auliya. “The Role of Community Lawyers in Fighting Economic Inequality: Legal Services As a Path to Social Justice”. Lentera Masyarakat Hukum 1, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.65815/f15v5p79
Spain. (1996). Ley 1/1996, de 10 de enero, de asistencia jurídica gratuita. Boletín Oficial del Estado, No. 11.
Spain. (2012). Ley 5/2012, de 6 de julio, de mediación en asuntos civiles y mercantiles. Boletín Oficial del Estado.
Spain. (2013). Real Decreto 980/2013, de 13 de diciembre, por el que se desarrollan determinados aspectos de la Ley 5/2012, de 6 de julio, de mediación en asuntos civiles y mercantiles. Boletín Oficial del Estado.
Spain. (2025). Ley Orgánica 1/2025, de 2 de enero, de medidas en materia de eficiencia del Servicio Público de Justicia. Boletín Oficial del Estado, No. 3.
Sukriono, Didik, et al. “Local Wisdom as Legal Dispute Settlement: How Indonesia’s Communities Acknowledge Alternative Dispute Resolution?.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 33, no. 1 (2025): 261-285. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.39958
Tamanaha, Brian Z. “Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global.” Sydney Law Review 30, no. 3 (2008): 375–411. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091891-17
Tyler, Tom R. Why People Obey the Law. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990).
United Nations Development Programme. (2005). Programming for justice: Access for all: A practitioner's guide to a human rights-based approach to access to justice. UNDP.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (n.d.). Legal services: UNHCR-hired lawyers and dispute settlement committees. UNHCR Iran.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (n.d.). Legal support. UNHCR Iran.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). Handbook on restorative justice programmes (2nd ed.). United Nations.
Utari, Indah Sri, Ridwan Arifin, and Sergi Fernandez Alejandro. “Gender-Based Violence and the Implementation of the Sexual Violence Crime Law in Indonesia”. The Indonesian Journal of Feminist Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (2026): 1-32. https://inleads.id/publications/index.php/IJFLS/article/view/1
World Bank. (2019). World development report 2019: The changing nature of work. World Bank.
World Justice Project. (2023). Global Insights on Access to Justice. World Justice Project.
Wulandari, Cahya, Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono, and Umi Faridatul Khikmah. “Paralegal Existence in Providing Access to Justice for the Poor in Central Java.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 4, no. 2 (2019): 199-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v4i2.21604
Zehr, Howard. The Little Book of Restorative Justice. (Intercourse, PA: Good Books, 2002).
Downloads
Published
Article ID
46364Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ridwan Arifin, Ena Kazić-Çakar, Abdul Haseeb, Valerio Sebastian, Seyedmohsen Hekmatimoghadam (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). All writings published in this journal are personal views of the author and do not represent the views of this journal and the author’s affiliated institutions.
