The Actualization of Pancasila Values as a Living Constitution in the Practice of Indonesia’s Constitutional Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/ijpgc.v5i2.47160Keywords:
Pancasila , Living Constitution, Constitutional Democracy, Constitutional Court, Indonesian ConstitutionalismAbstract
In the development of Indonesia’s post-reform constitutional democracy, interpreting Pancasila as a “living constitution” has become increasingly important for linking the state’s foundational philosophical values with governance practices capable of adapting to evolving social, political, and legal dynamics. This concept emphasizes that Pancasila is not merely a static normative foundation but also a living and evolving source of values within state governance. Its relevance is evident as Indonesian democracy faces challenges such as electoral fragmentation, political polarization, and declining public participation during the 2020–2026 period. These conditions highlight the need for constitutional interpretation that balances governmental stability, protection of citizens’ rights, and popular sovereignty. This study analyzes how Pancasila as a living constitution is understood within Indonesia’s constitutional democracy and examines how Constitutional Court interpretations reflect its values through judicial review. Using a normative legal method with conceptual, statutory, and case-based approaches, this study examines Constitutional Court Decisions No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024 and No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024. The findings show that Pancasila functions not only as a staatsfundamentalnorm but also as a dynamic normative framework that enables constitutional evolution through judicial interpretation. These rulings demonstrate the Court’s role in correcting distortions in procedural democracy, strengthening the inclusivity of popular sovereignty, maintaining institutional balance, and ensuring that democratic practices remain aligned with Pancasila’s fundamental values. This underscores the importance of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution in actualizing contextual, responsive, and sustainable Pancasila values.
References
Aldani, Abin Rifa, Ali Abdurrahman, and Lailani Sungkar. “The Application of Judicial Activism in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Regarding the Age Requirements for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates in Relation to the Theory of Legal Purpose.” Krtha Bhayangkara 18, no. 3 (2024): 587–95. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v18i3.3231.
ANTARA. “Wapres: ‘Living Constitution’ Bisa Saja Diterapkan Di Indonesia.” antaranews.com, 2019.
Asmono, Ari. “Gagasan Pengaduan Konstitusional Dan Penerapannya Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Yuridika 26, no. 3 (2011): 203–18. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v26i3.273.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Edited by Mardian Ahmad, Rofiqul-Umaam, Wibowo. Revisi. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
———. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Edited by Pan Mohamad Safa’at, Muchamad Ali, Faiz. Sekretariat Jenderal Dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. Vol. 1. Jakarta, 2006.
Barokah, Fitria, and Hertanto Hertanto. “Disrupsi Politik: Peluang Dan Tantangan Partai Politik Baru Jelang Pemilu 2024.” Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 21, no. 1 (2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v21i1.273.
Brahman, Maximiliania Krismarmita, Geal Aditya Christian, Nabila Sanina Fadhilah, and Nayya Devi Denita. “Analisis Prinsip Demokrasi Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia: Tinjauan Terhadap Implementasi Dan Tantangannya.” Politika Progresif: Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2024): 250–57. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v1i2.343.
Desmon, Andi. “Penafsiran Konstitusi Dalam Bingkai Hukum Pancasila.” Jurnal Cendikia Hukum 3 (2018): 129–37.
Fatmawati, Nuria. “Pancasila as a Nation and State Guideline: The Future Challenges.” Jurnal Scientia Indonesia 4, no. 2 (2018): 145–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v4i2.36042.
Fatullah, Ahmad Ari, Agung, M., Maghfur, Meladiah, Rahma. “Implikasi Konstitusional Dan Sistemik: Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional Dan Pilkada.” ELQONUN: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan 3, no. 1 (2025): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.19109.
Fauzan, Muhammad, Tedi Sudrajat, and Sri Wahyu Handayani. “Constitutionalism in a Post-Colonialism State: Socio-Cultural and Historical Perspective of Indonesian Constitution Identity.” Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria Do Direito 11, no. 1 (2019): 23–43. https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2019.111.02.
Febrianti, Lidia, Thamrin Sambah, and Puti Mayang Seruni. “Komparasi Alih Daya Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan Dengan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Tahun 2023.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6, no. 3 (2023): 1193–1209. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7965.
Hanan, Djayadi, Tri Sulistianing Astuti, and Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono. “Electoral Reform Through the Indonesian Constitutional Court: Constitutionality of Presidential Candidacy Threshold in Indonesia Reformasi Elektoral Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi: Konstitutionalitas Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 22, no. 2 (2025): 260–92.
Hapsoro, Fakhris Lutfianto, and Ismail Ismail. “Interpretasi Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Untuk Mewujudkan The Living Constitution.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020): 139–60. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644.
Harijanti, Susi Dwi. “Sistem Ketatanegaraan Berdasarkan UUD 1945.” Jurnal Ketatanegaraan 53, no. 9 (1981): 1689–99.
Hidayah, Yayuk, Risti Aulia Ulfah, and Nufikha Ulfah. “Membangun Demokrasi Sehat Dalam Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan.” ASANKA: Journal of Social Science and Education 4, no. 2 (2023): 137–46. https://doi.org/10.21154/asanka.v4i2.4813.
Indekstat. “Putusan MK No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Koreksi Sistemik Terhadap Beban Demokrasi.” Indekstat.com, 2017. https://indekstat.com/putusan-mk-no-135-puu-xxii-2024-koreksi-sistemik-terhadap-beban-demokrasi-2/.
JDIH Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. “Sistem Negara Indonesia Berdasarkan Teori Ketatanegaraan.” jdih.kpu.go.id, 2025. https://jdih.kpu.go.id/jabar/tasikmalaya/blog/read/18646/sistem-negara-indonesia-berdasarkan-teori-ketatanegaraan.
Joshi, Shailja, and Gharuan Mohali Punjab. “Transformative Constitutionalism In The Global South: A Study Of India And South Africa A Comparative Legal Analysis of Constitutional Transformation.” Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 12, no. 11 (2025): 699–719. https://doi.org/10.56975/jetir.v12i11.571086.
Kuswanto. “Penyederhanaan Partai Politik Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensiil Yang Multi Partai.” Yuridika 28, no. 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i2.1768.
Mastur, Mastur, and Feri Irawan. “Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terkait Inkonstitusional Bersyarat Ketidaksinkronan Berbagai Macam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Ada Di Indonesia Menurut Majelis Hakim Konstitu.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6, no. 3 (2023): 1295–1306. https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/julr/article/view/8044?utm_source.
Muhlashin, Ias. “Negara Hukum, Demokrasi Dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 8, no. 1 (2021): 87–100.
Nasution, Addriana Della, Wianda Julita Maharani, and Adam Imam Hamdana. “Analisis Asas Legalitas Substansional Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor: 90/PUU-XII/2023 Dalam Pemilu 2024 Di Indonesia.” Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 3, no. 2 (2024): 103–18. https://doi.org/10.30762/vjhtn.v3i2.489.
Nazila, Elza Ainnun. “Pancasila and the Existence of a People’s Economy: How Indonesia Facing the Global Capitalism?” Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 2 (2022): 265–84. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijpgc.v1i2.59810.
Nur, Lutfi, and Muhammad Ngazis. “Study Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi MK Nomor 62/PUU-XXII/2024 Penerapan Ambang Batas Presidensil (Presidential Threshold) Sebagai Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Dalam Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung 1, no. 1 (2025): 172–79.
Nurhasannah, Cindy, Meri Fernandes Sinaga, Dinda Amalia Nasution, Herlinda Herlinda, Brent Hizkia Pandang, and Ramsul Nababan. “Kajian Pancasila Sebagai Pilar Filosofis Demokrasi Indonesia Dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan.” Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 2, no. 3 (2025): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i3.853.
Parapat, Apwan Riadi, and Khalid. “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135 Puu-Xxii/2024 Tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional Dan Pemilu Daerah Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah.” QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies 4, no. 1 (2025): 527–37. https://doi.org/10.58738/qanun.v4i1.931.
Pinilih, Sekar Anggun Gading. “Penguatan Kedudukan Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan Sebagai Peradilan Etika.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 50, no. 3 (2021): 244–53. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.50.3.2021.244-253.
Praptini, Sri, Sri Kusriyah, and Aryani Witasari. “Constitution and Constitutionalism of Indonesia.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 2, no. 1 (2019): 7. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v2i1.4149.
Pratama, Aditya Andela, Kholifatul Muna, Zico Junius Fernando, and Wibisono Ariesta Anditya. “Revitalisasi Konstitusional Berbasis Pancasila Dalam Penghapusan Presidential Threshold.” Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan 5, no. 1 (2025): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v5i1.725.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 62/PUU-XXII/2024 (2024).
Rahmayanti, Alfi, and Ikhsan Fatah Yasin. “Implikasi Putusan MK No 62 Tahun 2024 Terkait Penghapusan Presidential Threshold.” TarunaLaw: Journal of Law and Syariah 3, no. 2 (2025): 179–85. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v3i02.475.
Saragih, Geofani Milthree, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, and Rengga Kusuma Putra. “Evaluasi Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia Melalui Pendekatan Konstitusional.” JRH: Jurnal Revolusi Hukum 28, no. 3 (2024): 202–17. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v28i3.1082.
Siregar, El Renova Ed, and Adya P Prabandari. “Dynamics of the Relationship Between Supreme Court and Constitutional Court: Conflict and Collaboration Perspectives.” Jurnal USM Law Review 7, no. 2 (2020): 729–39.
Soesatyo, Bambang, Kadir Johnson Rajagukguk, and Heri Wahyudi. “Building Legal Foundation for a Prosperous Indonesia: Insights from MPR-RI Four Pillars.” Yustisia 12, no. 3 (2023): 240–61. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v12i3.71520.
Solum, Lawrence B. “Originalism Versus Living Constitutionalism: The Conceptual Structure Of The Great Debate.” Northwestern University Law Review 113, no. 6 (2019): 1243–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.1998.11834974.
Sosial, Sejarah dan. “Kedudukan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Negara Dalam Pembukaan UUD 1945.” kumparan.com, 2024. https://kumparan.com/sejarah-dan-sosial/kedudukan-pancasila-sebagai-dasar-negara-dalam-pembukaan-uud-1945-23gKfeA4dkR.
Susanto. “Pancasila Sebagai Identitas Dan Nilai Luhur Bangsa: Analisis Tentang Peran Pancasila Sebagai Modal.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 2, no. 1 (2016): 44–52. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v2i1.1634.
Telman, D.A. Jeremy. “The Structure of Interpretive Revolutions.” SSRN Electronic Journal 35.2, no. 2018 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3532584.
Ulum, Widzan. “Hukum Dan Demokrasi Dalam Perspektif Konstitusional.” stekom.ac.id, 2025. https://stekom.ac.id/artikel/hukum-dan-demokrasi-dalam-perspektif-konstitusional.
UMS. “Presidential Threshold Resmi Dihapus MK, Babak Baru Demokrasi RI?” ums.ac.id, 2025. https://www.ums.ac.id/berita/teropong-jagat/presidential-threshold-resmi-dihapus-mk-babak-baru-demokrasi-ri.
Wicaksono, Agung Tri, Achmad Arby Nur, Sayidatul Mar’ah, and Ernawati Huroiroh. “Praktik Inkonstitusional Pemberhentian Hakim Konstitusi Pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.” Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 2, no. 1 (2023): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.30762/vjhtn.v2i1.217.
Widodo, Muhammad Fajar Sidiq, Munajad Munajad, and Bahru Rosyid Bazla. “Judicial Review Terkait Presidential Threshold Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Optik Hak Asasi Manusia.” Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 1, no. 2 (2022): 181–204. https://doi.org/10.30762/vjhtn.v1i2.188.
Wijaya, Rangga. “Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research 1, no. 1 (2023): 23–27. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v1i1.5.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
47160Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nailah Cahaya Putri Elza (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
