Reevaluating the Principle of Legal Fiction: Balancing Legal Certainty and Social Justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v10i1.13388

Keywords:

Principles of Legal Fiction, Justice, Society

Abstract

The principle of legal fiction is widely recognized for its role in legitimizing laws and ensuring legal certainty. However, while it contributes to the stability and predictability of legal applications, it also has inherent weaknesses that may lead to unjust outcomes, particularly for vulnerable groups who are unaware of the law. In the context of Indonesia’s vast territory, the lack of widespread socialization and public awareness of new legal regulations exacerbates these issues. Consequently, individuals, especially from lower socioeconomic classes, may become inadvertently entangled in legal processes due to their ignorance of applicable laws, leading to potential injustices. The principle of legal fiction, therefore, may inadvertently serve as a tool of oppression, particularly when used to position suspects as defendants without adequate awareness or understanding of their legal rights. This paper argues for a re-evaluation and improvement of the principle to ensure a more just and transparent application. A more nuanced approach is needed, distinguishing between its absolute application in criminal cases and its non-absolute use in regulatory offenses. By refining the concept of legal fiction, we can enhance both its legitimacy and its capacity to uphold justice for all members of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ade Maman Suherman. Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum, Civil Law, Cammon Law, Hukum Islam. Vol. II. Bandung: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.

Al-Billeh, T. “Disciplinary Measures Consequent on the Judges’ Misuse of Social Media in Jordanian and French Legislation: A Difficult Balance between Freedom of Expression and Restrictions on Judicial Ethics.” Kutafin Law Review 10, no. 3 (October 11, 2023): 681–719. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.2.25.681-719.

Apeldoorn, Laurens van. “The Legal Personality of Foreign States in Civil Law: L’affaire Zappa and the Bequest of the Marquise Du Plessis-Bellière.” Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d’Histoire Du Droit / The Legal History Review 91, no. 3–4 (December 22, 2023): 560–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20233408.

Arifin, Ridwan. “Translating the Meaning of Justice and Legal Protection: What Exactly Is Justice?”. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 1 (June 1, 2022): i-iv.

Bernard Arief Sidharta. Refleksi Tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000.

Binawan, Andang, and Maria Grasia Sari Soetopo. “Implementasi Hak Atas Lingkungan Hidup Yang Bersih, Sehat, Dan Berkelanjutan Dalam Konteks Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 9, no. 1 (February 21, 2023): 121–56. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v9i1.499.

Bruce Michael Rushing. “Decision and Theories in Ramsey’s Philosophy.” University of California, 2023.

Campos, Andre Santos. “The Idea of the Social Contract in the History of ‘Agreementism.’” The European Legacy 24, no. 6 (August 18, 2019): 579–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2019.1608049.

Carl Joachim Friedrich. The Philosophy of Law in Historical Perspective. Chicago: Universty of Chicago Press, 1969.

Dedy Mainata, Fira Mubayyinah, Endang Sutrisno, Siti Mialasmaya, and Syamsul Bahri. “Indonesian Migrant Workers: Enhancing Skills Through Short-Training Service Excellence.” International Journal of Community Care of Humanity (IJCCH) 1, no. 3 (2023): 303–10.

Dr.P.R.L. Rajavenkatesan, Shanmuga Sundaram Angamuthu. “The Role of ‘Legislative Intent’ and ‘Legal Fiction’ in Retrospective Law - Justification and Limitation.” Law & Society: Public Law - Courts EJournal 16, no. 1 (2024).

E. Fernando M. Manulang. Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan; Tinjauan Hukum Kodrat Dan Antinomi Nilai. Jakarta: Kompas, 2007.

Gegen, Gerardus, and Aris Prio Agus Santoso. “Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kesehatan Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” QISTIE 14, no. 2 (March 22, 2022): 25. https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v14i2.5589.

Gerard Turkel. Law and Society; Critical Aproaches. London: University of Delaware Press, 1996.

Hamdani, Fathul, et al. "Fiksi Hukum: Idealita, Realita, dan Problematikanya di Masyarakat." Primagraha Law Review 1, no. 2 (2023): 71-83.

H. L. A. Hart. The Concept of Law . New York: Clarendon Pres-Oxford, 1997.

Hans Kelsen. Pure Theory of Law . Callifornia: Barkely University of California Press, 1978.

Imafidon, E. Habermas’ Ethics of Intersubjectivity. In The Ethics of Subjectivity: Perspectives since the Dawn of Modernity . London: : Palgrave Macmillan UK., 2015.

J. Chidozie Chukwuokolo, Victor O Jeko, and Nnamdi Ambrose Nwankwo. “A Critical Examination of Communicative Action in The Political Philosophy of Habermas.” Journal of African Studies and Sustainable Development. 7, no. 2 (2024): 123–39.

Konstantinos Grigoriadis. The Concept of Equality in Benjamin Constant’s Political Thought. University of York: University of York, 2023.

Kuhu Badgi. “Unveiling The Fourth Amendment’s Digital Compass: Geo-Location Warrants in Modern Jurisprudence.” In Juris Mentem Law Review, VII:25. Washington: American University’s School of Public Affairs, 2023.

Kusumadi Pudjosewojo. Pedoman Pelajaran Tata Hukum Indonesia. 8th ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1997.

Levine, Sydney, Nick Chater, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Fiery Cushman. “Resource-Rational Contractualism: A Triple Theory of Moral Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, October 28, 2024, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24001067.

Ligthart, Sjors, Christoph Bublitz, Thomas Douglas, Lisa Forsberg, and Gerben Meynen. “Rethinking the Right to Freedom of Thought: A Multidisciplinary Analysis.” Human Rights Law Review 22, no. 4 (September 7, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac028.

Limbong, Abdul Kalam, and Abd. Mukhsin. “Domestic Violence as a Cause Of Divorce: A Legal Analysis of the Sidikalang Religious Court Considering Law Number 23 of 2004.” Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, October 17, 2024, 134–46. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.51737.

Mahfud M.D. “Keniscayaan Reformasi Hukum: Upaya Menjaga Jati Diri Dan Martabat Bangsa.” 2010.

Marwan, HSB, Ali. "Mengkritisi Pemberlakuan Teori Fiksi Hukum." Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 16, no. 3 (2016): 251-264.

Melina Constantine Bell. “Children’s Right to Access Potentially Critical Learning: Liberating Youth From Propagation of Structural Injustice .” Review Of Law and Social Justice 33, no. 1 (2024): 29–87.

Mısır, Hülya, and Gülay Akın. “Navigating Power and Impoliteness in Criminal Court Discourse.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 9, no. 2 (December 17, 2024): 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2024-2013.

Muhtar Said, Erfandi. “Tafsir Hakim Judex Facti Dan Judex Juris Terkait Batas Maksimal Upaya Administratif.” Progresif : Jurnal Hukum XVII, no. 1 (2023): 1–23.

P.S., Agus Prihartono, Lia Riesta Dewi, and Fatkhul Muin. “Smart And Green Campus Regulatory Design As Untirta’s Legal Policy To Improve the Quality of Participatory Higher Education.” Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum 22, no. 1 (April 1, 2023). https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.2265.

Romli Atmasasmita. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.

Satjipto Rahardjo. Ilmu Hukuim. 8th ed. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

———. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya, 2000.

———. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas, 2007.

Satria, Adhi Putra, and Eugenia Brandao. "Understanding the Nature of Legal Knowledge: In-Depth Critique of the Legal Fiction Principle." Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) 5, no. 2 (2023): 203-220.

Sudarto. Hukum Pidana I. Semarang: Undip, 1990.

Tempo.co. “Jimly: Fajrul Falaakh Penerobos Hukum Tata Negara.” TEMPO.CO, February 18, 2014.

Todung Mulya Lubis. Catatan Hukum. Jakarta: Kompas, 2007.

Vicki Dwi Purnomo, Suryawan Raharjo, and Aida Dewi. “It Is Necessary to Limit the Term of Office of the House of Representatives to Prevent Abuse of Authority in Indonesia.” Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences 2, no. 3 (March 28, 2023): 437–340. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v2i3.3588.

Widodo Dwi Putro. Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publising, 2011.

Wijaya, Daya Negri. “Jean-Jaques Rousseau Dalam Demokrasi.” Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review 1, no. 1 (January 15, 2016). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i1.9075.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

Article ID

13388

How to Cite

Reevaluating the Principle of Legal Fiction: Balancing Legal Certainty and Social Justice. (2025). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 10(1), 295-322. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v10i1.13388