Digital Challenge, Analogue Mind-set: Assessing Indonesia’s Electronic Criminal Evidence Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v11i1.35378Keywords:
Cybercrime, Digital Evidence, Digital Investigation, Electronic Evidence Framework, Legal Evidence System, Legal Reforms, KUHAPAbstract
This article examines the treatment of electronic evidence in Indonesian criminal proceedings under the EIT Act and the new KUHAP. It argues that the new KUHAP has not succeeded in establishing coherent legal architecture for electronic evidence. Instead, the framework remains fragmented, under-specified, and anchored in an inherited analogue evidentiary mind-set. This is unsatisfactory because it encourages formalistic reliance on printed outputs, leaves the collection, authentication, handling, preservation, and evaluation of electronic evidence inadequately governed, and generates uncertainty for investigators, prosecutors, and judges. The article identifies the principal doctrinal and institutional defects in the current framework and assesses their implications for truth-seeking, procedural fairness, and the reliability of criminal adjudication. It further evaluates the emerging reliance on open-source electronic evidence and argues that the central weakness of the Indonesian approach lies not merely in legislative incompleteness, but in the absence of a principled evidentiary governance model for digital proof. Its principal contribution is to show that ISO standards can supply that missing framework by structuring the governance, handling, and assessment of electronic evidence and by correcting the mistaken assumption that digital proof can be accommodated within essentially analogue evidentiary categories.
Downloads
References
Ajijola, A., P. Zavarsky, and R. Ruhl. ‘A Review and Comparative Evaluation of Forensics Guidelines of NIST SP 800-101 Rev.1:2014 and ISO/IEC 27037:2012’. World Congress on Internet Security (WorldCIS-2014), 8 December 2014, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/WorldCIS.2014.7028169.
Antwi-Boasiako, Albert, and Hein Venter. ‘A Model for Digital Evidence Admissibility Assessment’. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, edited by Gilbert Peterson and Sujeet Shenoi, AICT-511. Advances in Digital Forensics XIII. Springer International Publishing, 2017.
Asimah, Dewi. ‘To Overcome the Constraints of Proof in the Application of Electronic Evidence’. Jurnal Hukum Peratun 3, no. 2 (2021): 97–110. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.322020.97-110.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. SNI ISO/IEC 27037:2014 Teknologi Informasi—Teknik Keamanan—Pedoman Untuk Identifikasi, Pengumpulan, Akuisisi Dan Pelestarian Bukti Digital. 2014.
Butt, Simon, and Tim Lindsey. ‘The Criminal Procedure Code’. In Crime and Punishment in Indonesia, 1st edn. Routledge, 2020.
Biasiotti, Maria Angela, Joseph A. Cannataci, Jeanne Pia Mifsud Bonnici, and Fabrizio Turchi. ‘Introduction: Opportunities and Challenges for Electronic Evidence’. In Handling and Exchanging Electronic Evidence Across Europe, edited by Maria Angela Biasiotti, Joseph A. Cannataci, Jeanne Pia Mifsud Bonnici, and Fabrizio Turchi. Springer, 2018.
Chamdani, and Asri Wijayanti. ‘Critical Analysis about Legal Evidence in Court in the Justice System in Indonesia’. Journal of Positive School Psychology 6, no. 2 (2022): 5867–70.
Custers, Bart, and Lonneke Stevens. ‘Data as Evidence in Criminal Courts: Comparing Legal Frameworks and Actual Practices’. In Human-Robot Interaction in Law and Its Narratives: Legal Blame, Procedure, and Criminal Law. Cambridge University Press, 2024.
Giri Santosa, Dewa Gede, and Karell Mawla Ibnu Kamali. ‘Acquisition and Presentation of Digital Evidence in Criminal Trial in Indonesia’. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 11, no. 2 (2022): 195. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.195-218.
Goldman, Alvin I. ‘Legal Evidence’. The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Wiley Online Library, 2005, 163–75.
Haack, Susan. Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law. Law in Context. Cambridge University Press, 2014. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626866.
Herring, Jonathan. Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford University Press, 2022.
Hiatt, Keith. ‘Open Source Evidence on Trial’. Yale Law Journal Forum 125 (2016).
Hongjiao, L. ‘Application of Digital Evidence in Criminal Cases: Dilemma and Optimization’. Contemporary Social Sciences 9, no. 6 (2024): 115–31. Scopus.
Horan, Cecelia, and Hossein Saiedian. ‘Cyber Crime Investigation: Landscape, Challenges, and Future Research Directions’. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy 1, no. 4 (2021): 580–96. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp1040029.
Ingram, Jefferson L. Criminal Evidence. 13th Edition. Routledge, 2018.
International Organisation for Standardisation. ISO/IEC 27037:2012 - Guidelines for Identification, Collection, Acquisition, and Preservation of Digital Evidence. International Organisation for Standardisation, 2012.
Keane, Adrian, and Paul McKeown. The Modern Law of Evidence. 9th edn. Oxford University Press, 2012.
Kerr, Orin. ‘Digital Evidence and the New Criminal Procedure’. Columbia Law Review 105 (2005): 279–318.
Kerr, Orin. ‘Search Warrants in An Era of Digital Evidence’. Missisipi Law Journal 75 (2005): 85.
Leroux, Olivier. ‘Legal Admissibility of Electronic Evidence’. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 18, no. 2 (2004): 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360086042000223508.
Lewulis, Piotr. ‘Collecting Digital Evidence from Online Sources: Deficiencies in Current Polish Criminal Law’. Criminal Law Forum 33, no. 1 (2021): 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-021-09430-4.
Listiyanto, Apri. ‘Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Acara Pidana’. Jurnal Rechtsvinding Rechtsvinding Online (2017): 1–4.
Luhmann, Niklas. Law As A Social System. Oxford University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198262381.001.0001.
Makarim, Edmon. ‘Electronic Evidence and Electronic Signatures in Indonesia: The Probative Value of Digital Evidence’. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 10 (2013): 136–43.
Mason, Stephen and Daniel Seng, "The Foundations of Evidence in Electronic Form," in Electronic Evidence and Electronic Signatures, , edited by Stephen Mason and Daniel Seng. University of London Press, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, 2021.
Mitchell, Rebecca, Michael Stockdale, and Francis A. Gilligan. ‘The Search and Seizure of Digital Materials Under Warrant and Protecting Privilege: Comparative Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practice’. The Journal of Criminal Law, ahead of print, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183231223592.
Moussa, Ahmad Fekry. ‘Electronic Evidence and Its Authenticity in Forensic Evidence’. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 11, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00234-6.
Murdoch, Steven J., Daniel Seng, Burkhard Schafer, and Stephen Mason. The Sources and Characteristics of Electronic Evidence and Artificial Intelligence. Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, 2021.
Nazran, Finna, Tan Kamello, Hasim Purba, and Saidin. ‘The Legal Paradigm in a Global Context: Judicial of Evidence in Actualization of Electronic in Indonesia’. 642 (2021): 154–58.
Oerlemans, Jan-Jaap, and Maša Galič. ‘Cybercrime Investigations’. In Essentials in Cybercrime: A Criminological Overview for Education and Practice. Eleven International Publishing, 2022.
Ontanu, Elena Alina. ‘Normalising the Use of Electronic Evidence: Bring Technology Use into a Familiar Normative Path in Civil Procedure’. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 12, no. 3 (2022): 582–615. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1304.
Pratito, Arief Afdala. ‘The Validity of Electronic Evidence in Indonesian Criminal Procedure’. Ratio Legis Journal 2, no. 2 (2023): 744. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.2.2.%25p.
Prayudi, Yudi, Ahmad Ashari, and Tri K Priyambodo. ‘A Proposed Digital Forensics Business Model to Support Cybercrime Investigation in Indonesia’. I. J. Computer Network and Information Security 11 (2015): 1–8.
Pribadi, Insan. ‘Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana’. Jurnal Lex Renaissance 3, no. 1 (2018): 109–24. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss1.art4.
Purwoleksono, Didik Endro, Brahma Astagiri, and Agus Ristianto. Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Berdasarkan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia (Electronic Evidence Position Based on the Laws in Indonesia). No. 1962032519860. 2014.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings and for the Execution of Custodial Sentences Following Criminal Proceedings. OJ L 191, July 28, 2023.
Research and Development of Indonesia Prosecutor’s Office. ‘The Strength of the Value of Electronic Evidence in the Handling of Crime’. 2016.
Safrin, Mohammad and Hasnawati Hasnawati, "Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana," AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2878.
Salmah. ‘Ensuring the Admissibility and Credibility of Electronic Evidence in Indonesian Criminal Proceedings’. In Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders, edited by Morinaga Taro, vol. 113. The United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, 2022.
Sampson, Fraser. ‘Intelligent Evidence: Using Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) in Criminal Proceedings’. The Police Journal 90, no. 1 (2017): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X16671031.
Setya, Adi, and Abba Suganda. ‘Design of Digital Evidence Collection Framework in Social Media Using SNI 27037: 2014’. JUITA: Jurnal Informatika 10, no. 1 (2022): 127–38. https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v10i1.13149.
Shahrullah, Rina Shahriyani, Jihyun Park, and Irwansyah Irwansyah. ‘Examining Personal Data Protection Law of Indonesia and South Korea: The Privacy Rights Fulfilment’. Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2024). http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.5016.
Sitompul, Josua. Cyberspace, Cybercrimes, Cyberlaw: Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana. Tatanusa, 2012.
Stoykova, Radina. ‘Encrochat: The Hacker with a Warrant and Fair Trials?’ Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 46 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301602.
Stoykova, Radina, Stig Andersen, Katrin Franke, and Stefan Axelsson. ‘Reliability Assessment of Digital Forensic Investigations in the Norwegian Police’. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 40 (March 2022): 301351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301351.
Stoykova, Radina, and Katrin Franke. ‘Reliability Validation Enabling Framework (RVEF) for Digital Forensics in Criminal Investigations’. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 45, no. 301554 (2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301554.
Stoykova, Radina (Adi). ‘A New Right to Procedural Accuracy: A Governance Model for Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings’. Computer Law & Security Review 55 (November 2024): 106040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040.
Stoykova, Radina. ‘Digital Evidence: Unaddressed Threats to Fairness and the Presumption of Innocence’. Computer Law & Security Review 42, no. 105575 (2021): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575.
Taekema, Sanne, Bart van Klink, and Wouter de Been. Facts and Norms in Law: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Legal Method. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785361098.
Twining, William. Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays. 2nd edn. Law in Context. Cambridge University Press, 2006. Cambridge Core.
Wall, David S. ‘The Internet as a Conduit for Criminal Activity (Revised October 2015)’. In Information Technology and the Criminal Justice System, revised, edited by A. Pattavina. Sage, 2005.
White, Elizabeth. ‘Closing Cases with Open-Source: Facilitating the Use of User-Generated Open-Source Evidence in International Criminal Investigations through the Creation of a Standing Investigative Mechanism’. Leiden Journal of International Law 37, no. 1 (2024): 228–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000444.
Yeboah-Ofori, A., and A. D. Brown. ‘Digital Forensics Investigation Jurisprudence: Issues of Admissibility of Digital Evidence’. Journal of Forensic, Legal & Investigative Sciences 6, no. 1 (2020): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24966/flis-733x/100045.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
35378Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anton Hendrik Samudra, Subhajit Basu, Cristina Saenz Perez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the license of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
