Sole Custody and The Implication of Fault-based Divorce Under the Indonesian Legal System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4576Keywords:
Fault-based Divorce System, Impplication, Joint Custody, Religious Court, Sole CustodyAbstract
This study analyses the reasons why most judges in Indonesia’s religious courts tend to rule in favour of the sole custody model over the joint custody model following a divorce, even though the state, through the Child Protection Act, has enacted regulations emphasizing the granting of child custody using the joint custody model. This study is an evaluative review of the dominant sole custody model decided in the Religious Court concerning the Indonesian divorce law system, which emphasizes that divorce must be filed for a reason. The study results show that the divorce law requiring divorce to be accompanied by a reason and adopted by the Religious Court makes Indonesia a country that adopts a fault-based divorce system. This impacts the contestation and efforts of one party to find fault with the other party through the proof process in the Religious Court. Furthermore, to show that one party is better and more moral, there is a struggle for child custody rights while affirming the presumption that the party winning child custody is the better and more moral party. This means that child custody is always given to one party, not to both parties. The Religious Court needs to consider the use of a no-fault divorce system for several reasons: (1) Islamic jurisprudence recognizes no-fault divorce, namely, divorce with khuluk (khul’), and (2) efforts not to defame the couple in court are more in line with Islamic teachings.
Downloads
References
Ali, Muhammad Daud. Islamic Law : Introduction to Islamic Jurisprudence and the Legal System in Indonesia. (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016).
Amato, Paul R., and Shelley Irving. “Historical Trends in Divorce in the United States.” In Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution, edited by Mark A. Fine and John H. Harvey. (New York: Routledge, 2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315820880.
Amriel, R.I. “There Are No Ex-Children and Ex-Parents.” Tempo Newspaper, 2011. https://koran.tempo.co/read/opini/240505/tak-ada-mantan-anak-dan-mantan-orang-tua.
Bandar Lampung High Religious Court. “Bandar Lampung High Religious Court Number 011/Pdt.G/2020/PTA. Bdl.” 2020.
Basch, Norma. Framing American Divorce: From the Revolutionary Generation to the Victorians. (California: University of California Press, 2001).
Bauserman, Robert. “Child Adjustment in Joint-Custody versus Sole-Custody Arrangements: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Family Psychology 16, no. 1 (2002): 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.91.
Bradford, Laura. “The Counterrevolution: A Critique of Recent Proposals to Reform No-Fault Divorce Laws.” Stanford Law Review 49, no. 3 (1997): 607–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229344.
Clarke-Stewart, Alison, and Cornelia Brentano. Divorce: Causes and Consequences. (RI, USA: Yale University Press), 2006. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npfks.
Dieringer, Jennifer K., Susan R. Elsen, and Stephanie E. Goldenhersh. “Chapter 9 - Child Custody.” In Family Law Advocacy for Low and Moderate Income Litigants, edited by Jacquelynne J. Bowman, 2nd Edition. (Boston: Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc, 2008). https://search.worldcat.org/title/family-law-advocacy-for-low-and-moderate-income-litigants/oclc/1030942119.
Emon, Anver M. “Conceiving Islamic Law in a Pluralist Society: History, Politics and Multicultural Jurisprudence.” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (2006): 331-355. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24869084.
Gedong Tataan Religious Court. “Gedong Tataan Religious Court Number 0334/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Gdt.” 2019.
Gonzalez, Libertad. “Should Divorce Be Easier or Harder?” IZA World of Labor, 2014. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.113.
Herawati, Andi. “Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Sebagai Hasil Ijtihad Ulama Indonesia.” HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika 8, no. 2 (2011): 321-340. https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v8i2.367.321-340.
Hodson, David. A Practical Guide to International Family Law. (Dunfermline: Jordans Publishing Limited, 2008).
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry. Child Custody in Islamic Law. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108648042.
Kay, Herma Hill. “No-Fault Divorce and Child Custody: Chilling out the Gender Wars.” Family Law Quarterly 36, no. 1 (2002): 27–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25740368.
Khir, Bustami Mohamed. “The Right of Women to No-Fault Divorce in Islam and Its Application by British Muslims.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 17, no. 3 (2006): 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410600794970.
Lamb, M.E. “An Attachment Theory Approach to Parental Separation, Divorce, and Child Custody.” In Attachment: The Fundamental Questions, edited by Thompson R. A., J. A. Simpson, and L. J. Berlin, 357–364. (New York: The Guilford Press, 2021).
Mat, Ismail bin. “The Impact of Western Colonialism and Secularization on the Application of the Shari’ah Law in the Muslim World.” In AMSS 34th Annual Conference Muslim and Islam in the Chaotic Modern World: Relations of Muslim among Themselves and with Others, 2005. http://www.amss.net/pdfs/34/finalpapers/IsmailbinMat.pdf.
McHugh, James T. “No-Fault Divorce Laws: An Overview and Critique.” The Catholic Lawyer 18, no. 3 (1972).
Moir, Donald S. “No Fault Divorce and the Best Interests of Children.” Denver Law Review 69, no. 3 (1992): 663. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/dlr/vol69/iss3/18.
Muñoz Soro, José Félix, and Carlos Serrano-Cinca. “A Model for Predicting Court Decisions on Child Custody.” Edited by Donrich Thaldar. PLOS ONE 16, no. 10 (2021): e0258993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258993.
Nakonezny, Paul A., Robert D. Shull, and Joseph Lee Rodgers. “The Effect of No-Fault Divorce Law on the Divorce Rate Across the 50 States and Its Relation to Income, Education, and Religiosity.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 57, no. 2 (1995): 477. https://doi.org/10.2307/353700.
O’Connell, Mary E. “Alimony after No-Fault: A Practice in Search of a Theory.” New England Law Review 23, no. 2 (1988): 437–514.
Olson, David H. L., and John DeFrain. Marriage and the Family : Diversity and Strengths. 3rd Edition. (California: Mayfield, 2000). https://search.worldcat.org/title/41002797.
Palembang High Religious Court. “Palembang High Religious Court Decision No. 26/Pdt.G/2010.” 2010.
Parisot, Viktoria. “Performing the Bad Marriage? The Transition from a Troubled to a Troubling Family in the Course of Fault Divorce in the 21st Century.” Social Sciences 10, no. 12 (2021): 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120464.
Pearl, David, and Werner Menski. Muslim Family Law. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1998).
Podungge, Mohamad Salman, and Siah Khosyi’ah. “The Portrait of Children Custody Rights in Indonesia: A Study of Mother’s Rights in Child Custody from Gender Perspective.” Khazanah Sosial 4, no. 3 (September 12, 2022): 545–55. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v4i3.18845.
Rafiq, Aayesha. “Child Custody in Classical Islamic Law and Laws of Contemporary Muslim World (An Analysis).” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 4, no. 5 (2014): 267–77. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_5_March_2014/29.pdf.
Rahman, Fazlur. “A Survey of Modernization of Muslim Family Law.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 11, no. 4 (1980): 451–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743800054817.
Rehman, J. “The Sharia, Islamic Family Laws and International Human Rights Law: Examining the Theory and Practice of Polygamy and Talaq.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21, no. 1 (2007): 108–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebl023.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 1of 1974 Concerning Marriage (1974).
Republic of Indonesia. Compilation of Islamic Law (1991).
Sfeir, George N. “The Tunisian Code of Personal Status (Majallat Al-Ahw Al Al-Shakhsiy Ah).” Middle East Journal 11, no. 3 (1957). https://www.jstor.org/stable/4322925.
South Jakarta Religious High Court. “South Jakarta Religious High Court Decision No 10/Pdt.G/2016/PTA. JK.” 2016.
Supreme Court of Indonesia. Supreme Court Circulation Letter Number 1 of 2022 (2022).
Supreme Court of Indonesia. Supreme Court Circulation Letter Number 3 of 2018 (2018).
Supreme Court of Indonesia. “Supreme Court Decision No. 110 K/AG/2007 on 13 November 2007.” 2007.
Supreme Court of Indonesia. “Supreme Court Decision Nomor 102 K/Sip/1973 on 24 April 1975.” 1975.
Supreme Court of Indonesia. “Supreme Court Decision Number 574 K/Ag/2016.” 2016.
Thompson, Emily L., and F. Soniya Yunus. “Choice of Laws or Choice of Culture: How Western Nations Treat the Islamic Marriage Contract in Domestic Courts.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 25, no. 2 (2007): 361-395. https://wilj.law.wisc.edu/issues-archive/volume-25-issue-2/.
United Nation. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child.
Weitzman, L. The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. (New York: Free Press, 1985).
Yunanto, Yunanto. “Menerjemahkan Keadilan dalam Putusan Hakim.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 7, no. 2 (2019): 192-205. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.2.192-205.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
