Exploring the Effectiveness of Mediation in Resolving Disputes in the Indonesian Administrative Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4632Keywords:
Effectiveness Mediation, Dispute Resolution, Administrative CourtAbstract
This study analyzes mediation in administrative dispute resolution in Indonesian Administrative Courts. The settlement of administrative disputes through mediation is not recognized in the Administrative Court procedural law. Mediation in the dispute resolution process in Administrative Courts is still a matter of debate. One of the parties to the dispute is a public body or official who is included in the realm of public law, so that mediation is not possible. The execution of Administrative Court decisions that have permanent legal force does not guarantee justice and legal certainty. This research aims to analyze the development and implementation of mediation in settlement of public disputes in Administrative Courts. The research method used is doctrinal research or library research with secondary data sources in the form of legislation on Administrative Courts, Supreme Court regulations on mediation, and scientific journals of research results. The results showed that mediation in public dispute resolution is used as an alternative to dispute resolution and has long been applied in several countries. Mediation in administrative dispute resolution can be carried out in two ways. First, mediation can be carried out outside the Administrative Court, and then the lawsuit is revoked. Second, mediation can be carried out through Court-connected mediation in the Administrative Court. There is a need to develop and strengthen the application of Court-connected mediation for administrative dispute resolution from the aspects of procedural law and Administrative Court resources that support the mediation process.
Downloads
References
Adrian, Lin, and Solfrid Mykland. “Unwrapping Court-Connected Mediation Agreements.” Nordic Mediation Research 8 (2018): 3–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73019-6_6.
Ali, Shahla F. “Practitioners’ Perception of Court-Connected Mediated in Five Regions: An Empirical Study.” Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 51 (2018): 997.
Amarini, Indriati. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif Dan Efisien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Kosmik Hukum 16, no. 2 (2016): 87–88. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v16i2.1954.
Amarini, Indriati, Marsitiningsih Marsitiningsih, and Ratna Kartikawati. “Mediator Judge In Court: Approach To Local Wisdom In Banyumas Community.” YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 14, no. 1 (2023): 19–32. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.18066.
Anatoliyvna, Nesterova Iryna, and Shelever Natalya Vasylivna. “Mediation as an Alternative Method of Public Legal Disputes Solving.” Проблеми Законності, no. 145 (2019): 169–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.145.162219.
Anindito, Teguh, Aris Priyadi, and Arif Awaludin. “Pelaksanaan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan Negeri Banyumas.” Cakrawala Hukum: Majalah Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma 24, no. 1 (2022): 23–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51921/chk.v24i1.187.
Boyron, Sophie. “Mediation in French Administrative Courts: What Lessons for Administrative Justice?” N. Ir. Legal Q. 71 (2020): 457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v71i3.541
Dani, Umar. “Memahami Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Sistem Unity of Jurisdiction Atau Duality of Jurisdiction? Sebuah Studi Tentang Struktur Dan Karakteristiknya / Understanding Administrative Court in Indonesia: Unity of Jurisdiction or Duality.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 3 (2018): 405–24. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.405-424.
Derbisheva, O. A. “The Problems of Mediation Procedure in Civil Proceedings.” Legal Concept 20, no. 1 (2021): 118–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2021.1.18.
Gaoqing, Wu. “On the Status and Function of Judicial Justice in Social Governance Innovation.” Social Sciences in China 39, no. 3 (2018): 130–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2018.1483108.
Giovanni, Yohanes Jeriko, Rama Adi Saputra Sunadynatha, and Selvin Matthew Chandra. “Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Sebagai Profesi Hukum Mediator Dalam Rangka Membangun Integritas.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 1 (2023): 925–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i1.5055.
Gurieli, Ana. “Institutions of Court Settlement and Judicial /Court-Annexed Mediation as Part of the Unified System of Justice.” Law and World, 2020. https://doi.org/10.36475/6.2.2.
Heriyanto, Bambang. “Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Paradigma UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” PALAR (Pakuan Law Review) 4, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v4i1.784.
HR, Ridwan, Despan Heryansyah, and Dian Kus Pratiwi. “Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 25, no. 2 (2018): 339–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art7.
Indonesia, Mahkamah Agung Republik. “Laporan Pertanggungjawaban Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2021.” Jakarta, 2021.
Itrich-Drabarek, Jolanta, Marcin Jurgilewicz, Andrzej Misiuk, and Aleksandra Zając. “Mediation in the Administrative and Court-Administrative Proceedings.” Studia Iuridica, no. 89 (2022): 111–24. https://doi.org/10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-89.6.
Juniar, Afif, and Anna Erliyana. “Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Informasi Publik Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia Dengan Korea Selatan.” Journal of Law and Policy Transformation 6, no. 1 (2021): 1–19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v6i1.4382.
Katomina, V. “Justice As A Social Phenomenon.” Siberian Journal of Anthropology. 5, no. 2 (2021): 157–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2021-5-2-157-164.
Lande, John. “How Can Courts–Practically for Free–Help Parties Prepare for Mediation Sessions?” University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, no. 2023–11 (2023).
Lianti, Lita, Fiorentina Elfrida Shanty, and Windha Puji Astuti. “Peran PTUN Dalam Eksekusi Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Sebagai Langkah Efektif Penyelesaian Sengketa Tun: Universitas Negeri Semarang.” YUSTISI 10, no. 2 (2023): 76–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v10i2.14325.
Lunina, O. S., & Poplavskyi, V. Y. “Mediation As a Method of Pre-Trial Settlement of Public Legal Disputer in The Field of State Registration.” Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University Series “Law,” 2, no. 5 (2022): 56–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32342/2709-6408-2022-2-5-6.
Marvin, Renius Albert, and Anna Erliyana. “Polemik Jangka Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 49, no. 4 (2019): 942–58. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no4.2350.
Mulyana, Dedy. “Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Mediasi Di Dalam Pengadilan Dan Di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Positif.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 3, no. 2 (2019): 177–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i2.224.
Mulyani, Tri, Sukimin, and Wahyu Satria Wana Putra Wijaya. “Konsep Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Berbasiskan Nilai Keadilan Pancasila.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 10, no. 1 (2022): 133–59. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v10i1.5773.
Orfin, Agnieszka. “Efficiency of Criminal Proceedings and Their Cost.” Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu Im. Adama Mickiewicza, no. 14 (2022): 297–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2022.14.14.
Pawłowska, Elżbieta, Paweł Witkowski, and Paulina Trybus. “Mediation as an Innovative Dispute Resolution Tool Based on the Example of Public Organizations.” Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, no. 150 (2021): 169–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2021.150.13.
Peters, Niek. “The Enforcement of Mediation Agreements and Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation.” Corporate Mediation Journal, no. 1–2 (2019): 13–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5553/CMJ/254246022019003102005.
Pradityo, Randy. “Penyelesaian Perselisihan Internal Partai Politik Secara Mufakat Dan Demokratis/Dispute Resolution of Internal Political Parties in Consensus and Democratic.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 3 (2018): 375–86. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.375-386.
Pranadita, Nugraha. “Perubahan Fungsi Mediasi Dalam Praktek Di Pengadilan Negeri Dan Pengadilan Agama Kaitannya Dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Res Nullius Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2019): 98–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v1i2.2619.
Pranoto, Edi, and M Riyanto. “Politik Hukum Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara,” 2022.
Pratama, Zsa Zsa Bangun. “Kewenangan Ajudikasi Oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelayanan Publik.” JOURNAL EQUITABLE 5, no. 1 (2020): 89–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v5i1.2467.
Puspitaningrum, Sri. “Mediasi Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Spektrum Hukum 15, no. 2 (2018): 275–99. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v15i2.1121.
Putrijanti, Aju. “Jurisprudence of State Administrative Courts in The Development of State Administrative Law.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 2 (2021): 161–74. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.v21.161-174.
———. “The Competence of the Administrative Court and Administrative Justice.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 14, no. 2 (2020): 97–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1890.
Rahmah, Dian Maris. “Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadiln.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 4, no. 42 (2019): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4n1.1.
Riza, Dola. “Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 3, no. 1 (2018): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v3n1.7.
Ruslin. “An Existence of State Administration Court in Establishing Good Governance.” Aloha International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advancement (AIJMU) 1, no. 1 (2019): 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33846/aijmu10101.
Sayekti, N., and Isharyanto. “Quo Vadis Object of Civil Court of Justice Disputes After Government Administrative Law : Regional House of People’s Representative Decision Concerning Dismissal Recomendation for Regional Chief/Vice Chief Nur.” Aloha International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advancement (AIJMU) 2, no. 1 (2020): 8–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33846/aijmu20102.
Schaffer, Daniel Kaufman. “An Examination of Mandatory Court-Based Mediation.” Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management 84, no. 3 (2018).
Siregar, Taufik, and Zaini Munawir. “Mediasi Dalam Tiga Sistem Hukum Dan Perannya Di Dalam Terwujudnya Keberhasilan Tujuan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 3, no. 1 (2020): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i1.161.
Siswara, Majedi Hendi, and Zainal Asikin. “Dispute Resolution Through Mediation in the Court (Court Annexed Mediation) After the Enactment of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016.” International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) 7, no. 06 (2019): 92–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v7i6.lla01.
Sobakar, A., and R. Opatskyi. “Mediation as a Form of Pre-Trial Resolution of Disputes Regarding Forced Alienation of Property for Public Needs or for Reasons of Public Necessity.” Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 2023, 396–400. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.01.67.
Socawibawa, Nur Indra, and Arif Wibowo. “EFEKTIFITAS EKSEKUSI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DI INDONESIA: Peradilan, Tata Usaha Negara, Eksekusi Putusan, Efektifitas.” Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin 2, no. 1 (2023): 45–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.94.
Somantri, Dikdik. “Challenges In Execution Of Court Decision To Strengthen The Administrative Court Charisma.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 4, no. 2 (2021): 123–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.422021.123-140.
Suhariyanto, Budi. “Urgensi Kriminalisasi Contempt of Court Untuk Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (2019): 193–211. https://doi.org/:https://doi.org/10.31078/jk16110.
Syufaat, Syufaat. “Penerapan Prosedur Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf Di Pengadilan Agama.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 2018, 21–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i1.1678.
T. A. Kobzeva, I. Kulish. “Mediation Procedure in Ukrainian Realities.” Legal Horizons, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21272/legalhorizons.2020.i25.p34.
Tsiftsi, E. “Mediation in Administrative Disputes.” Law and World, 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36475/7.3.9.
Tvaronavičienė, Agnė, Natalija Kaminskienė, Dana Rone, and Rea Uudekull. “Mediation in the Baltic States: Developments and Challenges of Implementation.” Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 5, no. 4 (2022): 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-a000427.
Ustyuzhaninova, E.A. “Mediation in Public Law of Great Britain.” Administrative Law and Procedure, n.d. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2021-6-64-67.
Verba, I. “Mediation in Administrative Proceedings: Problems of Theory and Practice.” Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs’kogo Derzhavnogo Universytetu Vnutrishnikh Sprav, 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2021-3-186-190.
Wulandari, Desy. “Pengujian Keputusan Fiktif Positif Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Lex Renaissance 5, no. 1 (2020): 32–56. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art3.
Zhang, Chenyang. “Settlement and Mediation.” In Win in Chinese Courts: Practice Guide to Civil Litigation in China, 163–66. Springer, 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3342-6_11.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
