Questioning Human Rights, Looking for Justice: Analyzing the Impact of Supreme Court Circular Letter on Interfaith Marriages in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4634Keywords:
Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA), Interfaith Marriage, Human Rights, IndonesiaAbstract
The issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023 concerning Guidelines for Judges in Adjudicating Cases on Applications for Registration of Marriages between People of Different Religious Beliefs has caused problems regarding interfaith marriages in Indonesia. Both conceptually and in practice, interfaith marriages have long been controversial. Using a human rights approach, this article analyzes SEMA's position in the hierarchy of laws and regulations and the impact of SEMA Number 2 of 2023 on the independence of judges and the practice of interfaith marriages in Indonesia. The results of the analysis indicate that SEMA Number 2 of 2023 is contrary to human rights principles, especially the principles of religious rights, the right to choose a partner and the right to get married. Although the content of SEMA should only be related to technical matters of court processes, SEMA Number 2 of 2023 targets the substance of citizens’ rights; it asks judges to reject requests for the validation of interfaith marriages, even though the issue is clearly regulated by the Law on Population Administration. As a result, the chances of validating interfaith marriages through court decisions are closed. This policy not only limits the independence of judges in deciding such cases but also violates the human rights of citizens.
Downloads
References
Achmad, Ady Thea Dian. “8 Catatan Setara Institute Terhadap SEMA Perkawinan Beda Agama,” July 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/8-catatan-setara-institute-terhadap-sema-perkawinan-beda-agama-lt64b91fd23ec6c/.
Adar, Sinem. “Religious Difference, Nationhood and Citizenship in Turkey: Public Reactions to an Interreligious Marriage in 1962.” The History of the Family 24, no. 3 (July 3, 2019): 520–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2019.1633380.
Aini, Noryamin, Ariane Utomo, and Peter McDonald. “Interreligious Marriage in Indonesia.” Journal of Religion and Demography 6, no. 1 (May 6, 2019): 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/2589742X-00601005.
Arti, Dewi Yugi. “Pusat Studi Pluralisme Hukum FH UNAIR Keluarkan Rilis Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama.” Center for Legal Pluralism Studies, Faculty of Law, Airlangga University, October 6, 2023. https://fh.unair.ac.id/pusat-studi-pluralisme-hukum-fh-unair-keluarkan-rilis-tentang-perkawinan-beda-agama/.
Boorstein, Michelle. “Muslims Try to Balance Traditions, U.S. Culture on Path to Marriage.” Washington Post, May 27, 2008. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/26/AR2008052602150.html?hpid=sec-religion.
Buisson, Johanna Marie. “Interfaith Marriage for Muslim Women: This Day Are Things Good and Pure Made Lawful Unto You.” CrossCurrents 66, no. 4 (December 2016): 430–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cros.12211.
Butt, Simon. “Polygamy and Mixed Marriage in Indonesia: Islam and the Marriage Law in the Courts.” In Indonesia: Law And Society, edited by Tim Lindsey, 2nd ed., 277. Sydney: Federation Press, 2008.
CNN Indonesia. “Hakim PN Jakarta Pusat Kabulkan Pernikahan Pasangan Beda Agama.” CNN Indonesia, June 25, 2023. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230625112541-12-966266/hakim-pn-jakarta-pusat-kabulkan-pernikahan-pasangan-beda-agama.
———. “PN Jaksel Izinkan Pasangan Menikah Beda Agama Islam-Katolik.” CNN Indonesia, April 18, 2023. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230418132223-12-939282/pn-jaksel-izinkan-pasangan-menikah-beda-agama-islam-katolik.
———. “PN Surabaya Izinkan Warga Beda Agama Menikah.” CNN Indonesia, June 20, 2022. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220620173909-12-811262/pn-surabaya-izinkan-warga-beda-agama-menikah#:~:text=Pengadilan%20Negeri%20(PN)%20Surabaya%2C,Kependudukan%20dan%20Pencatatan%20Sipil%20Surabaya.
Dallas, Kelsey. “The Latest Data on Romance and Religion,” February 15, 2022. https://www.deseret.com/faith/2022/2/15/22923491/lds-mormon-church-latest-data-on-religion-marriage-aei-american-family-interfaith-marriage-dating/.
Darwish, Hazim. “Interfaith Marriage Laws in the UAE,” January 8, 2024. https://hhslawyers.com/blog/interfaith-marriage-laws-in-the-uae/.
Deplano, Rossana. “Is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Customary International Law? Evidence from an Empirical Study of US Case Law,” 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3518106.
Desimaliati. “Legality of Registration for International Religious Marriage Based on Court Decisions According to Law and Regulations in Indonesia.” Cepalo 6, no. 2 (November 15, 2022): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v6no2.2704.
Detik News. “PN Yogja Sahkan Nikah Beda Agama Islam Dan Katolik.” Detik News, December 16, 2022. https://www.dw.com/id/cegah-kumpul-kebo-pn-yogya-sahkan-nikah-beda-agama-islam-dan-katolik/a-64122362.
European Parliament. “The Universal Declaration of Human Rigjts and Its Relevance for the European Union,” 2018. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2018/628295/EPRS_ATA(2018)628295_EN.pdf.
Gautama, Sudargo. Hukum Antar Golongan Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 1980.
Hiddush for Religious Freedom and Equality. “Freedom of Marriage World Map.” Accessed May 8, 2024. https://marriage.hiddush.org/table.
Hukum Online. “Pengadilan Belum Seragam Dalam Memandang Nikah Beda Agama,” November 30, 2015. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pengadilan-belum-seragam-dalam-memandang-nikah-beda-agama-lt565c049ed65ba/.
Jahangir, Asma. “Elimination of All Forms of Religious Intolerance.” Geneva: United Nations General Assembly, July 29, 2010.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 Year 2009 on Supreme Court (n.d.).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 39 of Year 1999 on Human Rights (1999).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power and Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning Supreme Court as last amended by Law Number 3 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 14 of 1985 (n.d.).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 of Year 2009 on Judicial Authority (2009).
Leeman, Alex B. “Interfaith Marriage in Islam: An Examination of the Legal Theory Behind the Traditional and Reformist Positions.” Indiana Law Journal 84, no. 2 (2009): 743–71.
Lindner, Jannik. “Interfaith Marriages Statistics: Market Report & Data.” Gitnux Marketdata Report 2024. New York: Gitnux: A Global Commerce Media LLC Company, December 20, 2023. https://gitnux.org/interfaith-marriages-statistics/.
Lukito, Ratna. “Trapped Between Legal Unification and Pluralism: The Indonesian Supreme Court’s Decision on Interfaith Marriages.” In Muslim-Non-Muslim Marriage: Political And Cultural Contestations In Southeast Asia, edited by Gavin W. Jones, Chee Heng Leng, and Maznah Mohamad. Singapore: ISEAS, 2009.
Lukito, Ratno. “The Enigma of Legal Pluralism in Indonesian Islam: The Case of Interfaith Marriage.” Journal of Islamic Law and Culture 10, no. 2 (July 2008): 179–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15288170802236457.
Maningkam, Dasman, and Agus Dwiyanto. “Studi Implementasi UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan: Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Perkawinan Campuran Beda Agama Di Kantor Catatan Sipil Provinsi DKI Jakarta.” Thesis Public Administration, Gadjah Mada University, 2000.
Maqdir Ismail & Partners. “Mahkamah Agung – Badan Legislatif Ke-Empat Di Indonesia?” Accessed December 17, 2023. https://mip-law.com/mahkamah-agung-badan-legislatif-ke-empat-di-indonesia/.
Mohammed, Khaleel. “Imam Khaleel Mohammed’s Defense of Inter-Faith Marriage,” 2012. https://freethinkingstokie.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/eng_bothpages.pdf.
Muktiono. “AMICUS CURIAE Untuk Mendukung Para Pemohon Dalam Perkara Nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014 Perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” Malang: Pusat Pengembangan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Demokrasi, 2014. https://www.mitrahukum.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Amicus_Curiae_Muktiono.pdf.
Naʻīm, Abd Allāh Aḥmad. Islamic Family Law in a Changing Global World: A Global Resource Book. London and New York: Zed Books, 2002.
Nasir, Mohamad Abdun. “Religion, Law, and Identity: Contending Authorities on Interfaith Marriage in Lombok, Indonesia.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 31, no. 2 (April 2, 2020): 131–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2020.1773618.
National Commission on Violance Against Woman. “Siaran Pers Komnas Perempuan Perempuan Merespon Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Tentang Petunjuk Bagi Hakim Dalam Mengadili Perkara Permohonan Pencatatan Perkawinan Antar-Umat Yang Berbeda Agama Dan Kepercayaan, Mahkamah Agung Menerbitkan Kebijakan Diskriminatif,” July 27, 2023. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/siaran-pers-detail/siaran-pers-komnas-perempuan-perempuan-merespon-surat-edaran-mahkamah-agung-nomor-2-tahun-2023-tentang-petunjuk-bagi-hakim-dalam-mengadili-perkara-permohonan-pencatatan-perkawinan-antar-umat-yang-berbeda-agama-dan-kepercayaan.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Biarkan Hukum Mengalir. Jakarta: Kompas, 2007.
———. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas, 2007.
Ramadhani, Irwan and Nahrowi. “Penemuan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Pemberian Izin Pernikahan Beda Agama.” Journal of Law and Family Studies 5, no. 1 (2023): 35–50. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v5i1.6297.
Refugee Review Tribunal. Australian Government. “Country Advice Albania.” Albania, June 29, 2010. https://www.ecoi.net/en/file/local/1135976/1930_1352460396_alb36850.pdf.
Ridwan. Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: FH UII Press, 2014.
Ridwan, HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2011.
Rukiyanto, B. Agus, T. A. Deshi Ramadhani, and B. S. Mardiatmadja. Menerobos Pintu Sempit: Nafas Ilahi dalam Gereja KAJ. Deresan, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, 2009.
Sanjaya, Umar Haris. “Interpretation of Interfaith and/or Belief Marriage by Judges: Disparity and Legal Vacuum: Penafsiran Perkawinan Beda Agama Dan/Atau Kepercayaan Oleh Hakim: Disparitas Dan Kekosongan Hukum.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 3 (September 1, 2023): 536–55. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2039.
Saputra, Andi. “PN Jakut Izinkan Nikah Beda Agama Pasca-SEMA, Ini Sikap MA,” August 29, 2023. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6902148/pn-jakut-izinkan-nikah-beda-agama-pasca-sema-ini-sikap-ma.
———. “PN Tangerang Juga Sahkan Nikah Beda Agama Sepasang Katolik-Kristen Ini.” Detik News, November 30, 2022. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6434910/pn-tangerang-juga-sahkan-nikah-beda-agama-sepasang-katolik-kristen-ini.
Saragih, Markus. “Komnas Perempuan Minta SEMA Larangan Nikah Beda Agama Dicabut,” July 28, 2023. https://pgi.or.id/komnas-perempuan-minta-sema-larangan-nikah-beda-agama-dicabut/.
Sastra, Abd. Rozak A. Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama (Perbandingan Beberapa Negara). Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, 2011. https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/pkj-2011-2.pdf.
Sastroatmojo, Sudijono. “Konfigurasi Hukum Porgresif.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2005): 185–201.
Selby, Par Daniele. “Muslim Women In Tunisia Are Now Free To Marry Non-Muslim Men,” September 15, 2017. https://www.globalcitizen.org/fr/content/womens-rights-tunisia-marriage-religion/#:~:text=Muslim%20Women%20In%20Tunisia%20Are%20Now%20Free%20To%20Marry%20Non%2DMuslim%20Men&text=Tunisia%27s%20government%20will%20no%20longer,from%20marrying%20outside%20their%20faith.
Siregar, Syahriani. “ICRP Catat Tren Kenaikan Pasangan Beda Agama Dari Tahun Ke Tahun,” July 20, 2023. https://pontianakpost.jawapos.com/nasional/1462746656/icrp-catat-tren-kenaikan-pasangan-beda-agama-dari-tahun-ke-tahun.
Smith, Gregory, Alan Cooperman, Jessica Martinez, Elizabeth Sciupac, and Conrad Hackett. “America’s Changing Religious Landscape.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center, May 12, 2015. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2015/05/RLS-08-26-full-report.pdf.
SP, Sugeng. Memahami Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia, Teori Penyelundupan Hukum. Jakarta,: Kencana, 2021.
Supreme Court of Republic of Indonesia. The Decree of the Chief Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number 271/KMA/SK/X/2013 concerning Guidelines for Policy Formulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Accessed December 16, 2023. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/57kmaskiv2016/detailm.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Decision Nomor 1400K/PDT/1986 (January 20, 1989).
Surabaya District Court Decision Number 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby (n.d.).
Susanto, Anthon Freddy. Semiotika Hukum Dari Dekonstruksi Teks Menuju Progresivitas Makna. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2005.
Syukur, Paskalis Bruno, and Jacklevyn F. Manuputty. “Tanggapan KWI-PGI Terkait Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Tentang Petunjuk Bagi Hakim Dalam Mengadili Permohonan Pencatatan Perkawinan Antar-Umat Berbeda Agama,” Agust 2023. https://kabardamai.id/tanggapan-kwi-pgi-terkait-surat-edaran-mahkamah-agung-tentang-petunjuk-bagi-hakim-dalam-mengadili-permohonan-pencatatan-perkawinan-antar-umat-berbeda-agama/.
Temmerman, Ray. “Mixed Religion Marriage in Canada and Australia: A Gift for the People of God,” August 27, 2021. https://international.la-croix.com/news/religion/mixed-religion-marriage-in-canada-and-australia-a-gift-for-the-people-of-god/14807.
The British Embassy in Egypt. “Guidance Family Law in Egypt,” April 18, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/family-law-in-egypt/family-law-in-egypt#:~:text=Interfaith%20marriage,is%20Muslim%2C%20Christian%20or%20Jewish.
The Law of the Republic Indonesia Number 12 Year 2011 on the Establishment of Legislations (n.d.).
The Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. “Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim (Rechtvinding).” Accessed December 17, 2023. https://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=849:penemuan-hukum-oleh-hakim-rechtvinding&catid=108&Itemid=161&lang=en.
UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief. “Rapporteur’s Digest on Freedom of Religion or Belief.” Geneva: The United Nations Commission on Human Rights, 2023. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Religion/RapporteursDigestFreedomReligionBelief.pdf.
United Nations. Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1979). https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en.
———. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966). https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=treaty&mtdsg_no=iv-4&chapter=4&clang=_en.
———. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 2200A General Assembly Resolution § (1966). https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-3&chapter=4&clang=_en.
United Nations General Assembly. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, § 16 (1979).
———. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 217A General Assembly resolution § 23 (1948).
U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. “International Religious Freedom Report 2009: Indonesia,” October 26, 2009. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2009/eap/135992.htm.
U.S. Embassy Kabul. “Marriage.” Accessed May 8, 2024. https://af.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-services/local-resources-of-u-s-citizens/marriage/#:~:text=It%20is%20not%20possible%20for,to%20a%20Muslim%20religious%20ceremony.
Van Niekerk, Jana, and Maykel Verkuyten. “Interfaith Marriage Attitudes in Muslim Majority Countries: A Multilevel Approach.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 28, no. 4 (October 2, 2018): 257–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2018.1517015.
Wahyujati, Imam. “Pengaturan Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia.” Aainul Haq: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 2, no. 1 (2022): 49–63.
Wahyuni, Sri. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” In Right: Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Azasi Manusia 1, no. 1 (2011): 131–51. https://doi.org/10.14421/inright.v1i1.1215.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
