Is Indonesia Ready? A Legal and Policy Interrogation of Outcome-Based Academic Services for Accelerated Students with Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v11i1.48626Keywords:
Outcome-Based Education (OBE), Disability Rights Law, Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 4), Inclusive Higher Education, Indonesia Legal FrameworkAbstract
This study critically examines Indonesia’s readiness to implement outcome-based education (OBE) in academic services for accelerated students with disabilities, situating the analysis within national legal frameworks and the global commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 4 on inclusive and equitable quality education. Indonesia has formally recognized the right to inclusive education through key legal instruments, including Law No. 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities and Law No. 12 of 2012 on Higher Education, which mandate accessibility and non-discrimination in educational provision. However, a persistent gap remains between these normative commitments and their practical implementation in higher education institutions. Employing a normative juridical method combined with conceptual and policy analysis, this research evaluates the extent to which existing regulations support the operationalization of OBE in inclusive academic services. The findings reveal that although Indonesian legal frameworks provide a general mandate for disability inclusion, they lack specific and enforceable standards for integrating OBE principles—such as measurable learning outcomes, adaptive assessment systems, and institutional accountability mechanisms—particularly within acceleration programs. This regulatory ambiguity contributes to fragmented implementation and limits the achievement of equitable educational outcomes, thereby constraining Indonesia’s progress toward SDG 4 targets. This article argues that Indonesia is not yet fully prepared to align its higher education system with both OBE principles and SDG commitments without substantial legal and policy reform. Strengthening regulatory coherence, embedding disability-sensitive outcome indicators, and enhancing institutional compliance mechanisms are essential to bridging the gap between rights and results. This study contributes to legal scholarship by linking national regulatory frameworks with global development agendas, offering pathways toward a more inclusive and globally competitive higher education system.
Downloads
References
Ashworth, Mary, Sue Bloxham, and Leonie Pearce. “Examining the tension between academic standards and inclusion for disabled students: The impact on marking of individual academics’ frameworks for assessment.” Studies in Higher Education 35, no. 2 (2010): 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903062864
Azizah, Nur, Elga Andriana, and David Evans. “Conceptualising Inclusion within Indonesian Contexts.” Global Directions in Inclusive Education. (London: Routledge, 2021), pp. 81-98.
Azzahra, Maura Olivia, et al. “Legal Recognition of Hidden Disabilities in Higher Education.” Disable 2, no. 1 (2026): 33-64. https://doi.org/10.26740/dlr.v2i1.52510
Baiquni, Muhammad Iqbal, and Septhian Eka Adiyatma. “‘Keep It Within the Family’: Legal Intervention in the Social Normalization of Domestic Violence in Indonesian Communities”. The Indonesian Journal of Legal Intervention in Social Problems 1, no. 1 (2026): 31-70.
Biggs, John, and Catherine Tang. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. (Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education, 2011).
Burgstahler, Sheryl E. Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice. 2nd ed. (Boston: Harvard Education Press, 2015).
Crespo, Raquel M., et al. “Aligning assessment with learning outcomes in outcome-based education.” IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference. IEEE, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492385
Degener, Theresia. “A Human Rights Model of Disability.” In Peter Blanck and Eilionóir Flynn (eds). The Routledge Handbook of Disability Law and Policy. (London: Routledge, 2017), pp. 31-49.
Diny Sujannah, Wahyu, Sinta Swastikawara, and Zubaidah Ningsih. “Advancing inclusive practices in higher education: insights from Indonesia’s approach to disability support.” Cogent Social Sciences 11, no. 1 (2025): 2593559. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2593559
Foley Nicpon, Megan, et al. “Empirical Investigation of Twice-Exceptionality: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?.” Gifted Child Quarterly 55, no. 1 (2011): 3-17. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0016986210382575
Foley‐Nicpon, Megan, and Susan G. Assouline. “High ability students with coexisting disabilities: Implications for school psychological practice.” Psychology in the Schools 57, no. 10 (2020): 1615-1626. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22342
Foley-Nicpon, Megan, Susan G. Assouline, and Nicholas Colangelo. “Twice-Exceptional Learners: Who Needs to Know What?.” Gifted Child Quarterly 57, no. 3 (2013): 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490021
Fullan, Michael. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 4th ed. (New York: Teachers College Press, 2007).
Griful-Freixenet, Julia, Katrien Struyven, Wendelien Vantieghem, and Esther Gheyssens. “Exploring the Interrelationship between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI): A Systematic Review.” Educational Research Review 29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100306
Harden, Ronald M. “Why Outcome-based education (OBE) is an important development in medical education.” Routledge International Handbook of Medical Education. (London: Routledge, 2015), pp. 27-42.
Heryansyah, Despan, and Sahid Hadi. “On the hierarchy of human rights of persons with disabilities and higher education: Capturing the fulfilment of the right to accessibility in Indonesia.” The Routledge International Handbook of Disability Human Rights Hierarchies. (London: Routledge, 2023), pp. 255-282.
Holdheide, Lynn. “Same Debate, New Opportunity: Designing Teacher Evaluation Systems That Promote and Support Educators in Practices That Advance All Students’ Learning.” Journal of Special Education Leadership 28, no. 2 (2015): 74.
Iqbal, Asep Muhamad, and M. Pasqa. “Menuju Kampus Ramah Disabilitas di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan: Kajian dan Pengembangan Model Kebijakan Disabilitas di UIN Bandung.” Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat 5, no. 4 (2025): 594-609. https://doi.org/10.59395/p3mw0h64
Konur, Ozcan. “Creating enforceable civil rights for disabled students in higher education: An institutional theory perspective.” Disability & Society 15, no. 7 (2000): 1041-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/713662018
Lang, Raymond, et al. “Implementing the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Principles, implications, practice and limitations.” Alter. European Journal of Disability Research 5-3 (2011): 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2011.02.004
Latifiani, Dian, and Waspiah Waspiah. “Family Honor Versus Child Protection: Legal Intervention in the Persistence of Child Marriage in Indonesian Communities”. The Indonesian Journal of Legal Intervention in Social Problems 1, no. 1 (2026): 109-130.
Liasidou, Anastasia. “Disabling discourses and human rights law: a case study based on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37, no. 1 (2016): 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.936928
Meyer, Anne, David H. Rose, and David Gordon. Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. (Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing, 2014).
Moriña, Anabel. “Inclusive Education in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 32, no. 1 (2017): 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964
Mulyadi, Asal Wahyuni Erlin. “Policy of inclusive education for education for all in Indonesia.” Policy & Governance Review 1, no. 3 (2017): 201-212.
Oliver, Michael. The Politics of Disablement. (London: Macmillan International Higher Education, 2013).
Prameswari, Mahira Aluna. “Islamic Legal Modernism and Women’s Rights in Indonesian Pesantren Communities”. The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Legal Modernism 1, no. 1 (2026): 21-42.
Premalatha, K. “Course and Program Outcomes Assessment Methods in Outcome-Based Education: A Review.” Journal of Education 199, no. 3 (2019): 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057419854351
Rahajeng, Unita Werdi, Wiwin Hendriani, and Pramesti Pradna Paramita. “Navigating higher education challenges: A review of strategies among students with disabilities in Indonesia.” Disabilities 4, no. 3 (2024): 678-695. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities4030042
Rao, Kavita, and Margaret Meo. “Using Universal Design for Learning to Design Standards-Based Lessons of Outcome-Based Education.” SAGE Open 6, no. 4 (2016): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 12 of 2012 concerning Higher Education. (Jakarta: State Secretariat, 2012).
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities. (Jakarta: State Secretariat, 2016).
Rismawati, Shinta Dewi, et al. “Legal Culture and Disability Rights in Indonesian Islamic Higher Education: A Review of Practices.” Journal of Ecohumanism 3, no. 4 (2024): 1368-1377
Ronksley-Pavia, Michelle. “A Model of Twice-Exceptionality: Explaining and Defining the Apparent Paradoxical Combination of Disability and Giftedness in Childhood.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 38, no. 3 (2015): 318-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215592499
Sari, Indah Permata, et al. “Strategi Pembelajaran untuk Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Kategori Cerdas dan Bakat Istimewa (CIBI): Tinjauan Literatur.” caXra: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar 5, no. 1 (2025): 259-264. https://doi.org/10.31980/caxra.v5i1.2282
Shakespeare, Tom. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2014).
Shaw, Anne. “Inclusion of disabled Higher Education students: why are we not there yet?.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 28, no. 6 (2024): 820-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1968514
Simanjuntak, Jeremia Gom Gom Parulian. “Policy on Fulfilling the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Indonesia: Quo Vadis?.” Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies 8, no. 1 (2021): 211-277. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2021.008.01.16
Spady, William G. Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. (Arlington: American Association of School Administrators, 1994).
Steiner, Alecia. Embracing the intersection of giftedness and disability: Examining a Standalone school model for twice-exceptional learners. University of Southern California, 2024.
Townend, Geraldine, and Donna Pendergast. “Student voice: What can we learn from twice-exceptional students about the teacher’s role in enhancing or inhibiting academic selfconcept.” Australasian Journal of Gifted Education 24, no. 1 (2015): 37-51. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2015.0006
UNESCO. Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education: All Means All. (Paris: UNESCO, 2020).
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (New York: United Nations, 2006).
United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. New York: UN Publishing, 2015.
Utari, Indah Sri, Ridwan Arifin, and Sergi Fernandez Alejandro. “Gender-Based Violence and the Implementation of the Sexual Violence Crime Law in Indonesia”. The Indonesian Journal of Feminist Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (2026): 1-32.
Wijayanti, Nuniek Prahesti, et al. “The Role of the Disability Services Unit in Improving the Quality of Vocational Skills for Students with Special Needs.” IJOBBA: International Journal of Bunga Bangsa Cirebon 4, no. 2 (2025): 339-344.
Zubaedah, Zubaedah. “Sociolegal Analysis of Child Marriage Prevention Policies in Rural Indonesia”. The Indonesian Journal of Sociolegal Development 1, no. 1 (2026): 101-120.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
48626Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rodiyah Rodiyah, Waspiah Waspiah, Bayangsari Wedhatami, Runjati Runjati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the license of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
