Navigating the Political Economy Trilemma in the ASEAN Economic Community: A Legal Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v10i2.5417Keywords:
Political Economy Trilemma, Regional Organization, ASEAN Economic Community, ASEAN Charter, Legal InsightsAbstract
This article examines the challenges impeding effective regional economic integration in ASEAN through the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC). It does so by using Dani Rodrik's political economy trilemma theory as a conceptual framework. This analysis shows that ASEAN is currently stuck in the trilemma between hyperglobalization, nation-state, and democratic politics, leading to ineffective regional economic integration. Rodrik proposes that the solution to the political economy trilemma is not maximum globalization or economic integration but, instead, a smart form of globalization or of economic integration. This “smart form” contains a thin layer of international law that facilitates flexibility towards a country to maintain its national sovereignty. However, this article hypothesizes that this solution is underdeveloped as it lacks the legal details required to implement the smart form of globalization or economic integration. Specifically, the political economy trilemma framework does not provide the necessary legal mechanisms required to implement safeguard measures effectively and to navigate the principle of non-interference in intergovernmental contexts like ASEAN. This article aims to fill the legal gap by analyzing the legal dimension of the AEC through the lens of Rodrik's political economy trilemma. Thus, by applying Rodrik’s political economy trilemma, this article provides legal insights as thought directions for operationalizing the smart legal framework required to address the political economy trilemma, such as moving beyond the principle of non-interference, reforming the AEC institutional framework, and establishing safeguard measures within the AEC legal framework.
Downloads
References
Aggarwal, Vinod K., and Jonathan T. Chow. "The Perils of Consensus: How ASEAN’s Meta-Regime Undermines Economic and Environmental Cooperation." Review of International Political Economy 17, no. 2 (2010): 262-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290903192962
Agreement on ASEAN Preferential Trading Arrangements, Manila, 24 February 1977, ASEAN.
Aimsiranun, Usanee. “Comparative Study on the Legal Framework on General Differentiated Integration Mechanisms in the European Union, APEC, and ASEAN.” ADBI Working Paper 1107. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, 2020. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/238464
Aizenman, Joshua, and Hiro Ito. "The Political-Economy Trilemma." Open Economies Review 31, no. 5 (2020): 945-975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-020-09588-1
ASEAN Charter, Singapore, 20 November 2007.
ASEAN Declaration (Bangkok Declaration), Bangkok, Thailand, 8 August 1967.
ASEAN Secretariat. ASEAN Economic Community 2015: Progress and Key Achievements. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2015.
Aziz, Davinia Abdul, and Renaud Dehousse, “The Instruments of Governance of ASEAN: An Inventory and Critical Analysis, in ASEAN Integration Through Law”, The 2nd Plenary of the ASEAN Integration Through Law Project Centre of International Law National University of Singapore, July 19, 2013. Available online at https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SD_Executive-Summary-Aziz-and-Dehousse-formatted.pdf
Aziz, Nur Aziemah. “Britain & The European Union: The Separation”, ASEAN Focus 6, (2016).
Basu Das, Sanchita. "Mind the Gap: Explaining Implementation Shortfalls in the ASEAN Economic Community." ISEAS Economics Working Paper No. 2017-7. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, 2017.
Bauder, Harald, and Rebecca Mueller. "Westphalian vs. indigenous sovereignty: Challenging colonial territorial governance." Geopolitics 28, no. 1 (2023): 156-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1920577
Bellamy, Alex J., and Catherine Drummond. “The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia: Between Non-interference and Sovereignty as Responsibility.” The Pacific Review 24, no. 2 (2011): 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2011.560958
Bowles, Paul, and Brian MacLean. "Understanding trade bloc formation: the case of the ASEAN Free Trade Area." Review of International Political Economy 3, no. 2 (1996): 319-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434358
Craig, Paul, and Gráinne De Búrca. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA, 2011.
Desierto, Diane, and David Cohen (eds). ASEAN Law and Regional Integration: Governance and the Rule of Law in Southeast Asia’s Single Market. London: Routledge, 2020.
Dosch, Jörn. "The ASEAN Economic Community: Deep Integration or Just Political Window Dressing?." TRaNS: Trans-Regional and-National Studies of Southeast Asia 5, no. 1 (2017): 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2016.28
Ginsburg, Tom. "Eastphalia as the Perfection of Westphalia." Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 17, no. 1 (2010): 27-46. https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2010.17.1.27
Inama, S., and E. W Sim. The Foundation of the ASEAN Economic Community: An Institutional and Legal Profile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316181300
Ishikawa, Koichi. "The ASEAN Economic Community and ASEAN Economic Integration." Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 10, no. 1 (2021): 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.1891702
Jerusalem, Moh Firstananto. "The ASEAN Without a Customs Union or a Single Market Consequences of the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025." Customs Research and Applications Journal 2, no. 1 (2020): 101-127. https://doi.org/10.31092/craj.v2i1.20
Jones, Lee. "Explaining the Failure of the ASEAN Economic Community: The Primacy of Domestic Political Economy." The Pacific Review 29, no. 5 (2016): 647-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1022593
Leviter, Lee. “The ASEAN Charter: ASEAN Failure or Member Failure?” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 43, no. 1 (2010): 159-210.
Novy, Andreas. "The political trilemma of contemporary social-ecological transformation–lessons from Karl Polanyi’s The Great Transformation." Globalizations 19, no. 1 (2022): 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1850073
Palley, Thomas. "The Fallacy of the Globalization Trilemma: Reframing the Political Economy of Globalization and Implications for Democracy." Düsseldorf: FMM Working Paper, No. 8, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK), Forum for Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Policies, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/181466
Pascha, Werner. "The Globalization Trilemma and Regional Policy Space: Opportunities and Challenges for the EU and East Asia." East Asian Community Review 2, no. 1 (2019): 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42215-019-00018-0
Prayitno, Heru. "The Dilemma of Upholding ASEAN's Principle of Non-Interference in the Case of Myanmar Political Crisis." Technium Social Sciences Journal 28, no. 1 (2022): 870-878.
Rodrik, Dani. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011.
Schermers, Henry G., and Niels M. Blokker. International Institutional Law. Leiden: Brill Nijjoff, 2018.
Severino, Rodolfo. Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2006.
Snell, Jukka. "The Trilemma of European Economic and Monetary Integration, and Its Consequences." European Law Journal 22, no. 2 (2016): 157-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12165
Stubbs, Richard. "ASEAN Sceptics versus ASEAN Proponents: Evaluating Regional Institutions." The Pacific Review 32, no. 6 (2019): 923-950. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1611627
Tay, Simon S. C. “The ASEAN Charter Between National Sovereignty and Regional Constitutionalism.” Singapore Year Book of International Law 12 (2008).
Tijaja, Julia, Simon Tay, and Sanchita Basu Das. ASEAN Post-2025: Reimagining the ASEAN Economic Community. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, 2024.
Van den Bossche, Peter. "Can the WTO Dispute Settlement System Be Revived?." In Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann and Armin Steinbach (Eds). Constitutionalism and Transnational Governance Failures. Leiden: Brill, 2024, pp. 308-335.
Van den Bossche, Peter. “The Demise of the WTO Appellate Body: Lessons for Governance of International Adjudication?”. WTI Working Paper Universität Bern, No. 2 (2021). Available online at https://www.wti.org/media/filer_public/c2/ef/c2efc2de-ce85-45c7-9512-9286e14fca47/wti_working_paper_02_2021.pdf
Woon, Walter. "Dispute Settlement in ASEAN." Conference Paper, presented at the Korean Society of International Law Conference, 21 October 2011, Daegu, South Korea.
Yean, Tham Siew Yean. "ASEAN Trade in Services Agreement (ATISA): Advancing Services Liberalization for ASEAN?" ISEAS Perspective No. 54 (2019). Singapore: ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute. 2019.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
5417Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Abdillah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the license of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
