Exploring Mate Selection Preferences in Indonesia: A Preliminary Study for Instrument Development in Non-formal Education Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v11i1.12147Keywords:
Mate Selection Preferences, Scale Development and Analysis, Focus Group, Thematic AnalysisAbstract
Background:
Mate selection preferences is an evaluation process that aims to find a partner who is considered potential for someone. This study was inspired by Buss and Barnes' study regarding mate selection preferences, as well as Hinkin, Tracey, and Enz's study regarding the seven stages of scale development and analysis; to investigate Indonesians’ mate selection preferences.
Research objectives:
This study was considered as a replication research for Indonesia context to verify the prior results’ consistency and accuracy of research on mate selection preferences inspired by Buss and Barnes as well as to develop an instrument of mate selection preferences for Indonesians.
Research methods:
This study used three stages --out of seven stages-- of scale development and analysis by Hinkin, Tracey, and Enz as an early investigation. The first stage is item generation using a qualitative approach with a total of 47 participants aged over 17 years were divided into four focus groups as data collection method and thematic analysis as its analysis method. The second stage is content adequacy assessment using quantitative approach with eleven experts to assess generated items from the first stage. The eleven experts consisted of measurement experts, psychometricians, psychologists, developmental and family psychology lecturers or scientists. The third stage is questionnaire administration for determining the scale for items and an adequate sample size. The questionnaires using rank order scale were distributed online for 423 respondents.
Research findings:
The finding of the first stage was 33 themes of mate selection preferences, including same religion, ethnicity consideration, family blessing, attractive physical appearance, mentally and physically healthy, as item generation. The result from the second stage was the validation from experts, resulted in 22 characteristics with a validation range of 0.345 – 0.831 and a good category of reliability of 0.898. The result from the third stage was the order of preference for choosing a partner, was obtained by placing the characteristic of same religion as the first order.
Research conclusions:
The results of the first three stages in this research can be used as a starting point to understand how Indonesians select partners who are influenced by characteristics of same religion, cultural or ethnicity considerations, and family blessing. The same religion was ranked first in the order of mate selection preferences. This study then should be continued to the next four stages of instrument development in order to create a final scale of Indonesians’ mate selection preferences.
Research novelty:
The unveiling of Indonesians mate selection preferences as an early investigation introduces the “richness” and the wisdom of Indonesian cultures in marriage as well as appreciation and understanding of how marriages in Indonesia are bound by religions, cultures or ethnicity, and family values. It also informs the complexity of how to find an ideal partner. However, this study is practically can be used to non-formally educate Indonesian people as well as foreigners to understand how Indonesians select partners.
Downloads
References
Aprilia, T., Fitriani, E., & Febrianto, A. (2024). Pemilihan Jodoh pada Masyarakat Nagari Padang Tarok. Culture & Society: Journal of Anthropological Research, 6(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.24036/csjar.v6i1.145
Ariyani, M., Wahyuni, L. D., & Putri, F. R. (2022). Mencari pasangan di dunia maya. In G. Gumelar, H. Maulana, & Z. Akbar (Eds.), Manusia Digital dalam Perspektif Psikologi (pp. 36–44). Pena Persada Kerta Utama.
Ariyani, M., Wahyuni, L. D., Putri, F. R., & Izzati, A. Z. (2022). Offline and Online Mate Selection Preferences for Indonesians: An Initial Study. The International Conference on Current Advancement in Psychology (ICCAP) 2022 - Psychology for Sustainable Recovery in the Life after the Pandemic, 47–50.
Brackett, K. P. (2016). Mate selection. In Encyclopedia of Family Studies (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs314
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 22(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211058251
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, M. N. Coutanche, L. M. McMullen, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (2nd ed., pp. 65–81). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000319-004
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704908006001
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. 63(2), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x
Choy, B. K. C., & Li, N. P. (2021). Buss’ Mate Choice Theory. In A. D. Lykins (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sexuality and Gender. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59531-3_44-1
Christou, P. A. (2023). How to use Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Tourism, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4337/jqrt.2023.0006
Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2021). Mate Preferences. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1
Darnton, G. (2023). Likert scales and questions: uses and abuses. European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, 22(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.22.1.1748
Djabbar, M. E. A., & Winaudri, W. (2020). Buginese Women’s Attitude Toward Uang Panai’ as One of the Wedding Cultures in Buginese. In 5th ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (ACPCH 2019). Atlantis Press.
Driebe, J., Stern, J., Penke, L., & Gerlach, T. (2024). Probing the predictive validity of ideal partner preferences for future partner traits and relationship outcomes across 13 years. European Journal of Personality, 38(4), 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231213797
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Joel, S. (2023). Mate evaluation theory. Psychological Review, 130(1), 211–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000360
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2019). Best practices for testing the predictive validity of ideal partner preference-matching. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218780689
Fitriyani. (2022). Multicomplex Uang Panai’ terhadap Perempuan dalam Perkawinan Keluarga Muslim Suku Bugis. Tasyri’ Journal of Islamic Law, 1(2).
Furham, A., & Cuppello, S. (2024). Sex, Personality, and Mate Preferences. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000362
Gusti, H. K. (2024). Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Tentang Dinamika Peran Orang Tua dalam Pemilihan Pasangan Pernikahan menurut Adat Jawa dan Implikasinya terhadap Perlindungan Hak-hak Anak. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan , 18(5).
Haggerty, B. B., Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2021). The Disconnected Couple: Intimate Relationships in the Context of Social Isolation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.002
Henshaw, J. M., Fromhage, L., & Jones. A. G. (2022). The evolution of mating preferences for generic atractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias. PNAS, 119(33), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206262119
Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 21(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108
Hou, J., Shu, T., & Fang, X. (2020). Influence of resources on cue preferences in mate selection. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574168
Indonesian Ulama Council. (2023). Fatwa number 4/MUNAS VII/MUI/8/2005. Majelis Ulama Indonesia; https://mui.or.id/baca/fatwa/perkawinan-beda-agama. https://mui.or.id/baca/fatwa/perkawinan-beda-agama
Islam, M. N. (2021). Gender differences in mate selection criteria among university students in Bangladesh: A study from the social homogamy perspective. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07378
Komariah, S. (2023). Gender Dynamics Analysis: Uncovering the Roles and Identities of Bugis-Makassar Women. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning , 4(2), 216–226.
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). Erratum to "A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
MacDonald, G., Marshall, T. C., Gere, J., Shimotomai, A., & Lies, J. (2012). Valuing romantic relationships: The role of family approval across cultures. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(4), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397112450854
Masfiah, U. (2022). Bobot, Bibit, and Bebet in Choosing a Mate. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Religious Literature and Heritage (ISLAGE 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220206.045
Nurhalisa, & Pratiwi, I. (2023). Tradisi Uang Panai dan Status Sosial Perempuan pada Budaya Perkawinan Suku Bugis Wajo. Pinisi: Journal of Art, Humanity and Social Studies, 3(5).
Oksavina, M. B. (2023). Keabsahan Perkawinan Semarga Masyarakat Adat Batak Ditinjau Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 21(1), 45.
Opuni, F. F., & Alhassan, I. A. (2023). The Likert Scale: Exploring The Unknowns and Their Potential to Mislead The World. UDS International Journal of Development , 9(22). https://doi.org/10.47740/586.UDSIJD6i
Orenstein, G. A., & Lewis, L. (2022). Erikson’s Stages of Psychosocial Development. StatPearls [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556096/
Pamungkas, E. K., & Viktorahadi, R. F. B. (2021). Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Kitab Suci, Ajaran, dan Hukum Gereja. Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Lintas Budaya , 5(3), 421–432.
Papalia, D. E., & Martorell, G. (2023). Experience Human Development (15th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Parker, L., Hoon, C. Y., & Raihani. (2014). Young people’s attitudes towards inter ethnic and inter-religious socializing, courtship and marriage in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 22(4), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2014.0230
Sabri, F. A. (2024). The Meaning of Offspring and The Spouse Selection of Javanese Muslims in Surabaya Based on Maqasid Shariah. Al Risalah, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.51049
Santrock, J. W. (2020). A topical approach to lifespan development (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Scheller, M., de Sousa, A. A., Brotto, L. A., & Little, A. C. (2023). The role of sexual and romantic attraction in human mate preferences. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2176811
Shepard, C. (2024). The Use of Likert-Type Scales in Survey Research Examining Students’ Attitudes, Challenges, and Languages Use in an EMI University in Hong Kong. In S. M. Curle & J. Pun (Eds.), Researching English Medium Instruction: Quantitative Methods for Students and Researchers (pp. 40–45). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009425407
Silfanus, J. (2022). Perkawinan Beda Agama Secara Alkitabiah Dalam Masyarakat Pluralisme. The Way: Jurnal Teologi Dan Kependidikan, 8(1), 82–95.
Siregar, R. S., Syakban, M., & bin Rosele, M. I. (2023). The Role of Marriage Guardian of the Same Clan in the Traditional Marriage of Batak Toba Muslims in Samosir Regency in the Perspective of Islamic Law. Al-Manāhij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 17(1), 41–52.
Solin, S. D. N., Mursyid, D., Amri, A., Sugirman, A., & Zubair, A. (2024). Batak Customary Marriage: A Study of the Prohibition of Same-Clan Marriage and Its Relevance in the Contemporary Era. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga , 7(1).
Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2021). Essentials of thematic analysis. American Psychological Assosiation. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000238-000
Utomo, A., & McDonald, P. (2016). Who marries whom? Ethnicity and marriage pairing patterns in Indonesia. Asian Population Studies, 12(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2015.1130327
Wæraas, A. (2022). Thematic Analysis: Making Values Emerge from Texts. In G. Espedal, B. Jelstad Løvaas, S. Sirris, & A. Wæraas (Eds.), Researching Values. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3
Williams, M., & Sulikowski, D. (2020). Implicit and explicit compromises in long-term partner choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 166(110226). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110226
Wilson, D. (2024, April). World’s Most (And Least) Religious Countries, 2024. CEOWorld Magazine. https://ceoworld.biz/2024/04/08/worlds-most-and-least-religious-countries-2024/
Yuniarni, S. (2016, July 16). Unity in Diversity: Indonesia’s Six Largest Ethnic Groups. Jakartaglobe.Id. https://jakartaglobe.id/culture/unity-diversity-indonesias-six-largest-ethnic-groups
Yunus, N. R. (2021). Weakening Tradition: The Shifting in Same-Clan Marriage Prohibition in Mandailing Batak. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 21(2).
Downloads
Published
Article ID
12147Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mira Ariyani, Lussy Dwiutami Wahyuni, Fildzah Rudyah Putri, Kurniati Kurniati, Musab Isah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.