Beyond Traditional Testing: Exploring the Efficacy of Adaptive Assessments in Shaping Future Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v11i1.19934Keywords:
Adaptive Assessment, Learning Approach, Learning Needs, Traditional AssessmentAbstract
This study investigates the impact of adaptive assessment tools on student learning outcomes, engagement and knowledge retention compared to traditional assessment methods. The research employs a descriptive survey design, utilising a quantitative research approach to gather data from 200 students across various educational settings in Kwara State, Nigeria. The primary research questions explore how adaptive assessments influence knowledge retention, engagement levels and the identification of areas needing additional support. By focusing exclusively on students as respondents, the study reliable data that elucidates the effectiveness of adaptive assessments in enhancing knowledge retention and engagement within educational settings. The findings reveal that adaptive assessments significantly enhance knowledge retention, as indicated by mean scores above the established cut-off point of 3.0 across all survey items. Students reported high levels of engagement, motivation and clarity regarding their learning needs when using adaptive tools. In contrast, traditional assessments received notably lower scores, suggesting limited effectiveness in fostering positive learning experiences. The study concludes that adaptive assessment tools provide a more personalised and effective approach to student learning, leading to improved outcomes in both knowledge retention and engagement. It is recommended that educators integrate adaptive assessments into their curricula to maximise student learning potential. Policymakers should consider supporting the implementation of adaptive technologies in educational institutions to enhance the overall learning experience. The research contributes to the theoretical understanding of personalised learning approaches and offers empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of adaptive assessments in contemporary education.
Downloads
References
Abubakar, U., Falade, A. A., & Ibrahim, H. A. (2024). Redefining student assessment in Nigerian tertiary institutions: The impact of AI technologies on academic performance and developing countermeasures. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(2), 1149-1159. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.009
Agger, C. A., & Koenka, A. C. (2020). Does attending a deeper learning school promote student motivation, engagement, perseverance, and achievement? Psychology in the Schools, 57(4), 627-645. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22347
Ajogbeje, O. J. (2023). Enhancing Classroom Learning Outcomes: The Power of Immediate Feedback Strategy. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, 6(3), 453-465. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1323080
Akhter, S., Javed, M. K., Shah, S. Q., & Javaid, A. (2021). Highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of E-learning. Psychology and Education, 58(5), 1607-1614.
Al Abri, M. H., Al Aamri, A. Y., & Elhaj, A. M. A. (2024). Enhancing Student Learning Experiences Through Integrated Constructivist Pedagogical Models. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(1), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(1).11
Al Fraidan, A. A. (2024). The Enhanced Adaptive PPP Model: A Novel Framework for Revolutionizing Test-Taking Strategies in Language Assessment. Forum for Linguistic Studies 7(1), 298-312. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7918
Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
Alarifi, I. M. (2023). Learning Limitless Knowledge: Transformative Learning Pathway to Unlocking and Harnessing the Endless Power of Knowledge. Balboa Press.
Al-Samarraie, H., & Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016
Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of social sciences, literature and languages, 1(1), 9-16.
Andrews, M., Brown, R., & Mesher, L. (2018). Engaging students with assessment and feedback: improving assessment for learning with students as partners. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 32-46.
Asad, M. M., Hussain, N., Wadho, M., Khand, Z. H., & Churi, P. P. (2021). Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: an empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 649-663. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0103
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.
Barney, M., & Fisher Jr, W. P. (2016). Adaptive measurement and assessment. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062329
Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
Bimba, A. T., Idris, N., Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Mahmud, R. B., & Shuib, N. L. B. M. (2017). Adaptive feedback in computer-based learning environments: a review. Adaptive Behavior, 25(5), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712317727590
Birenbaum, M., & Dochy, F. (Eds.). (2012). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (Vol. 42). Springer Science & Business Media.
Cai, L., Msafiri, M. M., & Kangwa, D. (2024). Exploring the impact of integrating AI tools in higher education using the Zone of Proximal Development. Education and Information Technologies, 1-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13112-0
Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420945845
Cheng, E. C. (2011). The Role of Self-regulated Learning in Enhancing Learning Performance. International Journal of Research & Review, 6(1).
Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
Colchester, K., Hagras, H., Alghazzawi, D., & Aldabbagh, G. (2017). A survey of artificial intelligence techniques employed for adaptive educational systems within e-learning platforms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research, 7(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1515/jaiscr-2017-0004
Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024). Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y
Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia system. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2014). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. Applications of flow in human development and education: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 475-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_24
Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st-century learning. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119210863
Devilly, O. Z. (2021). The impact of an adaptive learning environment on students’ classroom-related and learning-related emotions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick).
Dudek, C. M., Reddy, L. A., & Kettler, R. J. (2023). One size does not fit all: a concurrent analysis of the framework for teaching and the Classroom Strategies Assessment System. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 35(3), 353-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-023-09405-6
El Gazi, S., & Ibrahimi, A. (2024). Personalized Learning: Theory, Practices, and Perspectives. In Fostering Pedagogical Innovation Through Effective Instructional Design (pp. 308-328). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1206-3.ch014
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
Felton, M., Garcia‐Mila, M., Villarroel, C., & Gilabert, S. (2015). Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 372-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12078
Florian, L., & Linklater, H. (2010). Preparing teachers for inclusive education: using inclusive pedagogy to enhance teaching and learning for all. Cambridge journal of education, 40(4), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.526588
Fontaine, G., Cossette, S., Maheu-Cadotte, M.A., Mailhot, T., Deschênes, M.F., Mathieu-Dupuis, G., Côté, J., Gagnon, M.P. & Dubé, V. (2019). Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2011). The formative assessment action plan: Practical steps to more successful teaching and learning. ASCD.
García-Jiménez, E., Gallego-Noche, B., & Gómez-Ruíz, M. Á. (2015). Feedback and self-regulated learning: How feedback can contribute to increase students’ autonomy as learners. Sustainable Learning in Higher Education: Developing Competencies for the Global Marketplace, 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9_9
Gipps, C. (2011). Beyond Testing (Classic Edition): Towards a theory of educational assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203182437
Gonulal, T., & Loewen, S. (2018). Scaffolding technique. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0180
Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st-century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Corwin Press.
Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Salas, C. R. (2013). Supporting effective self-regulated learning: The critical role of monitoring. In International Handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 19-34). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_2
Halkiopoulos, C., & Gkintoni, E. (2024). Leveraging AI in e-learning: Personalized learning and adaptive assessment through cognitive neuropsychology—A systematic analysis. Electronics, 13(18), 3762. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183762
Harati, H., Sujo-Montes, L., Tu, C. H., Armfield, S. J., & Yen, C. J. (2021). Assessment and learning in knowledge spaces (ALEKS) adaptive system impact on students’ perception and self-regulated learning skills. Education Sciences, 11(10), 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100603
Harper, B. (2018). Technology and teacher-student interactions: A review of empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690
Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181-1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
Hill, J., & West, H. (2020). Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908
Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014
Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., & Arellano, L. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments: The scholarship on creating and assessing conditions for student success. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume 27, 41-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2950-6_2
Iskandarovna, S. N. (2024). Effective feedback: providing constructive feedback for ESL student progress. Scientific Impulse, 2(19), 457-462.
Khine, M. S. (2024). Using AI for Adaptive Learning and Adaptive Assessment. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Machine-Generated Literature Overview (pp. 341-466). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9350-1_3
Khursheed, S., & Alwi, S. K. K. (2023). Evaluation of formative assessment strategies in enhancing student achievements and learning motivation in higher secondary schools. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research, 6(2).
Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem-solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024
Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centred education and constructivism: Challenges, concerns, and clarity for teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(3), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1191311
Krautloher, A. (2024). Improving assessment equity using interactive oral assessments. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.53761/4hg1me11
Kritek, P. A. (2015). Strategies for effective feedback. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 12(4), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-524FR
Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in physiology education, 42(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00122.2017
Lappalainen, G., & Fanni, A. (2017). Game-Based Assessments of Cognitive Ability: Validity and Effects on Adverse Impact through Perceived Stereotype Threat, Test-Taking Motivation and Anxiety (Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary).
Lee, D., Huh, Y., Lin, C. Y., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2018). Technology functions for personalized learning in learner-centered schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1269-1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9615-9
Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 629-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
Lin, L., Lin, X., Zhang, X., & Ginns, P. (2024). The Personalized Learning by Interest Effect on Interest, Cognitive Load, Retention, and Transfer: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09933-7
Liu, Z. M., Hwang, G. J., Chen, C. Q., Chen, X. D., & Ye, X. D. (2024). Integrating large language models into EFL writing instruction: effects on performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2310288
Looi, C.K., Sun, D., Wu, L., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L.H., Soloway, E. & Norris, C. (2014). Implementing mobile learning curricula in a grade level: Empirical study of learning effectiveness at scale. Computers & Education, 77, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.011
Mann, K., & MacLeod, A. (2015). Constructivism: learning theories and approaches to research. Researching medical education, 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118838983.ch6
Mejeh, M., Sarbach, L., & Hascher, T. (2024). Effects of adaptive feedback through a digital tool–a mixed-methods study on the course of self-regulated learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12510-8
Mellow, G. O., Woolis, D. D., Klages-Bombich, M., & Restler, S. (2023). Taking College Teaching Seriously-Pedagogy Matters!: Fostering Student Success Through Faculty-Centered Practice Improvement. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447269-7
Mogale, M. L. (2025). Differentiated Instruction as a Strategy to Support Progressed Learners Within Inclusive Classrooms. In Global Practices in Inclusive Education Curriculum and Policy (pp. 343-364). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4058-5.ch014
Muñoz, A., & Ramirez, M. (2015). Teachers’ conceptions of motivation and motivating practices in second-language learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 13(2), 198-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515593885
Nagaraj, B. K., Kalaivani, A., Begum, S., Akila, S., & Sachdev, H. K. (2023). The emerging role of artificial intelligence in stem higher education: A critical review. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation, 5(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.54392/irjmt2351
Namaziandost, E., Kargar Behbahani, H., & Heydarnejad, T. (2024). Tapping the alphabet of learning-oriented assessment: self-assessment, classroom climate, mindsets, trait emotional intelligence, and academic engagement are in focus. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00293-1
Nelson, K. (2017). Cognitive development and the acquisition of concepts. In Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 215-239). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315271644-17
Nelson, L. M. (2013). Collaborative problem-solving. In Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 241-267). Routledge.
Nieminen, J. H. (2023). Unveiling ableism and disablism in assessment: A critical analysis of disabled students’ experiences of assessment and assessment accommodations. Higher Education, 85(3), 613-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00857-1
Niyibizi, O., & Mutarutinya, V. (2024). Enhancing learning outcomes in mathematics education through innovative assessment methods and timely feedback. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14584
Okafor, J. O. (2024). The Role of Digital Tools in Assessment and Their Impact on Educational Practices: Peran Perangkat Digital dalam Penilaian dan Dampaknya terhadap Praktik Pendidikan. Indonesian Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 152-165.
Osae, C., & Papadopoulos, I. (2024). Delving into Educators’ Perspectives and Practices in Second Language Teaching Contexts: Differentiated Instruction in the Spotlight. In Forum for Linguistic Studies 6(3), 294-325. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6565
Phuong, A. E., Nguyen, J., & Marie, D. (2017). Evaluating an adaptive equity-oriented pedagogy: A study of its impacts in higher education. Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(2), 5-44.
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935
Prastikawati, E. F., Adeoye, M. A., & Ryan, J. C. (2024). Fostering Effective Teaching Practices: Integrating Formative Assessment and Mentorship in Indonesian Preservice Teacher Education. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 6(2), 23-253. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v6i2.23431
Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink‐Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20344
Rad, H. S., Alipour, J., Jafarpour, A., & Hashemian, M. (2024). Unlocking the magic of digital adaptivity: Unleashing students' writing skills and self-determination motivation through digital literacy instruction. System, 125, 103454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103454
Rahman, L. (2024). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development of teaching and learning in STEM education. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 13(8).
Rawlusyk, P. E. (2018). Assessment in higher education and student learning. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 21.
Russ-Eft, D., Preskill, H., & Jordan, J. B. (2024). Evaluation in organizations: A systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change. Basic Books.
Russell, J. M., Baik, C., Ryan, A. T., & Molloy, E. (2022). Fostering self-regulated learning in higher education: Making self-regulation visible. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420982378
Saputra, I., Kurniawan, A., Yanita, M., Putri, E. Y., & Mahniza, M. (2024). The Evolution of Educational Assessment: How Artificial Intelligence is Shaping the Trends and Future of Learning Evaluation. The Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.33022/ijcs.v13i6.4465
Saxena, R., Carnevale, K., Yakymovych, O., Salzle, M., Sharma, K., & Saxena, R. R. (2023). Precision, Personalization, and Progress: Traditional and Adaptive Assessment in Undergraduate Medical Education. Innovative Research Thoughts, 9(4), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.2023-v9i4-029
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 14, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Schoonen, A. (2024). Learning to engage students through assessment: reflective and evidence-based portfolios as an alternative to traditional assessment. In ICERI2024 Proceedings (pp. 5270-5275). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2024.1291
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English language teaching, 3(4), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237
Shah, A., Devmane, A., Ranka, M., & Churi, P. (2024). Improvised progressive model based on automatic calibration of difficulty level: A practical solution of competitive-based examination. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 6909-6946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12045-4
Shen, Y. (2024). Personalised Education: A study on the relationship between student assessment methods and student development. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 199, p. 01002). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419901002
Shi, L., Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., Aylett, A., Debats, J., Goh, K., Schenk, T., Seto, K.C., Dodman, D., Roberts, D. & Roberts, J.T. (2016). Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research. Nature Climate Change, 6(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2841
Silalahi, R. M. (2019). Understanding Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development for learning. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 15(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v15i2.1544
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2024). AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3221
Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD.
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N. & Gašević, D. (2022). Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075
Tariq, M. U., & Sergio, R. P. (2025). Innovative Assessment Techniques in Physical Education: Exploring Technology-Enhanced and Student-Centered Models for Holistic Student Development. In Global Innovations in Physical Education and Health (pp. 85-112). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3952-7.ch004
Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004
Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. ASCD. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483365633.n1
Tutunaru, T. (2023). Improving Assessment and Feedback in the Learning Process: Directions and Best Practices. Research & Education, (8), 38-60. https://doi.org/10.56177/red.8.2023.art.3
Wang, H., & Lehman, J. D. (2021). Using achievement goal-based personalized motivational feedback to enhance online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 553-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09940-3
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
Wise, R. M., Fazey, I., Smith, M. S., Park, S. E., Eakin, H. C., Van Garderen, E. A., & Campbell, B. (2014). Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global environmental change, 28, 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Strategies, methods, and supports for developing skills within learning communities: A systematic review of the literature. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090231
Zeng, W., Huang, F., Yu, L., & Chen, S. (2018). Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning—a critical review of literature. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30, 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9281-9
Zhang, Z., & Huang, X. (2024). Exploring the impact of the adaptive gamified assessment on learners in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12708-w
Downloads
Published
Article ID
19934Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moses Adeleke Adeoye, Entika Fani Prastikawati, Rika Riwayatiningsih (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.