Virtual Reality-Enhanced Higher Education for Inclusive, Innovative, and Sustainable Learning

Authors

  • Saiful Ridlo Universitas Negeri Semarang Author
  • Sony Zulfikasari Universitas Negeri Semarang Author
  • Devi Ajeng Efrilianda Universitas Negeri Semarang Author
  • Rodiyah Universitas Negeri Semarang Author
  • Chau Kien Tsong University Sains Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v15i2.36673

Keywords:

virtual reality, immersive learning, virtual laboratory, Science education, educational technology

Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate a Virtual Reality (VR)-based laboratory model and examine its effects on student engagement, confidence, perceived conceptual understanding, and short-term cognitive performance in undergraduate science learning. Using a design-based research and development approach with iterative cycles, the VR laboratory was designed following Outcome-Based Education (OBE) principles and validated through expert judgment and classroom implementation. Data were collected using questionnaires, observations, qualitative reflections, and pretest-posttest assessments. The results indicate that the VR laboratory model demonstrates high pedagogical feasibility and is associated with increased student engagement, learning motivation, operational confidence in using immersive technology, and short-term improvements in conceptual understanding. Qualitative findings highlight the benefits of safe simulation, enhanced spatial visualization, and contextualized experiential learning, while usability issues and learner comfort remain practical challenges that require further refinement. At the institutional level, the validated VR laboratory model is positioned as a pilot-ready digital learning infrastructure that has the potential to support inclusive and quality science education (Sustainable Development Goal 4) and foster educational innovation and digital infrastructure development (Sustainable Development Goal 9). However, the findings primarily reflect short-term, context-specific outcomes; therefore, further large-scale, longitudinal studies with controlled comparisons are required to substantiate claims about long-term learning retention, scalability, and systemic SDG impact.

References

Albus, P., Vogt, A., & Seufert, T. (2021a). Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 166, 104154.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2019). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Biswas, P., Wang, J., & Turner, J. (2024). Cybersickness in immersive virtual environments: A systematic review. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(7), 1-38.

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-24.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com) ing a knowing researcher. International journal of transgender health, 24(1), 1-6.

Cai, Y., & Lattu, A. (2022). Triple helix or quadruple helix: which model of innovation to choose for empirical studies? Minerva, 60(2), 257-280.

Cahyadi, A., Hendryadi, Widyastuti, S., & Suryani. (2022). COVID-19, emergency remote teaching evaluation: the case of Indonesia. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2165-2179.

Casmat, C. H., & Muralitharan, K. (2025). Pengaruh penggunaan virtual reality (VR) terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Lensa Teknik, 4(2), 135-147.

Chang, C.-Y., Sung, H.-Y., Guo, J.-L., Chang, B.-Y., & Kuo, F.-R. (2020). Effects of spherical video-based virtual reality implementation on students' natural science learning effectiveness. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 915-939.

Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2017). The expertise reversal effect is a variant of the more general element interactivity effect. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 393-405.

Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). A case study of immersive virtual field trips in science learning. Computers & Education, 130, 134-145.

Coban, M., Yildirim, G., & Demir, A. (2022). The effect of immersive virtual reality on learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 187, 104471.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Dengel, A, & Mägdefrau, J (2018). Immersive learning explored: Subjective and objective factors influencing learning outcomes in immersive educational virtual environments. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2018, pp. 608-615.

Dengel, A, & Mägdefrau, J (2020). Immersive learning predicted: Presence, prior knowledge, and school performance influence learning outcomes in immersive educational virtual environments. 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN), San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, 2020, pp. 163-170.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Dinet, J., & Kitajima, M. (2018, April). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning: Cognitive implications. In Proceedings of the virtual reality international conference-laval virtual (pp. 1-8).

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Figueiredo, N. L., Fernandes, C. I., & Abrantes, J. L. (2023). Triple helix model: Cooperation in knowledge creation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 854-878.

García, J. A. M., Gómez, C. G., López, A. T., & Schlosser, M. J. (2024). Applying the technology acceptance model to online self-learning: A multigroup analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100571.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of computers in education, 8(1), 1-32.

Hiemstra, D., Van Yperen, N. W., & Timmerman, M. E. (2019). Students' effort allocation to their perceived strengths and weaknesses: The moderating effect of instructional strategy. Learning and Instruction, 60, 180-190.

Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A. S. (2020). Influence of students' learning style, sense of presence, and cognitive load on learning outcomes in an immersive virtual reality learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596-615.

Irfan, M. R., Purwaningsih, E., & Basri, M. (2024). Analisis Kebutuhan Media Pembelajaran Virtual Reality (VR) Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Sungai Raya. Jurnal Edukasi Ekonomi, 8(2), 43-51.

Irwanto, I., Lintangnicita, T., Cahyana, U., & Cha, J. (2025). Examining the effect of immersive virtual reality on 11th-grade students' creative thinking disposition and academic achievement. Discover Education, 4(1), 438.

Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and information technologies, 23(4), 1515-1529.

Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Nomor 39 Tahun 2025 tentang Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 661. Retrieved from https://jdih.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/

Kuncoro, T., Ichwanto, M.A., Dwiyanto, F.A. (2025). Immersive learning through virtual reality for civil engineering education. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 44(1), 92-101.

Kustandi, C., Fadhillah, D. N., Situmorang, R., Prawiradilaga, D. S., & Hartati, S. (2020). VR Use in Online Learning for Higher Education in Indonesia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(01), 31-47.

Lehtinen, S. (2023). Aesthetic choice in the age of ecological awareness. In M. Poltrum, M. Musalek, K. Galvin, Y. Saito, & H. Fox (Eds.), Oxford handbook of mental health and contemporary western aesthetics (pp. 231-246). Oxford University Press.

Liu, J. Y. W., Yin, Y. H., Kor, P. P. K., Cheung, D. S. K., Zhao, I. Y., Wang, S., ... & Leung, A. Y. (2023). The effects of immersive virtual reality applications on enhancing the learning outcomes of undergraduate health care students: systematic review with meta-synthesis. Journal of medical Internet research, 25, e39989.

Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1141-1164.

Makransky, G., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Benefits of taking a virtual field trip in immersive virtual reality: Evidence for the immersion principle in multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1771-1798.

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational psychology review, 33(3), 937-958.

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2019). Investigating the process of learning with desktop virtual reality: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 134, 15-30.

Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225-236.

Maulana, A., & Nurharini, A. (2024). Pengembangan Media Virtual Reality Berbasis Aplikasi Artsteps untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Seni Tari. Fondatia, 8(3), 631-651.

Mayer, R. E., Makransky, G., & Parong, J. (2023). The Promise and Pitfalls of Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(11), 2229-2238.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.

OECD. (2021a). Education at a glance 2021. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2021). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing.

Pannen, P. (2021). Quality assurance in online learning at scale at the Indonesia cyber education institute. In Powering a learning society during an age of disruption (pp. 121-134). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785-797.

Persichitte, K. A., Suparman, A., & Spector, J. M. (Eds.). (2017). Educational technology to improve quality and access on a global scale: Papers from the Educational Technology World Conference (ETWC 2016). Springer.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda n. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.

Rafiq, A. A., Putra, D. S., Triyono, M. B., & Novian, D. (2025). Cybersickness in virtual reality research: A comprehensive bibliometric review and visualisation. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 15(1), 24-44.

Rahmawati, N., & Narsa, I. M. (2019). Penerimaan teknologi pembelajaran (TAM/UTAUT) dalam konteks pendidikan. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2).

Rebenitsch, L., & Owen, C. (2016). Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual reality, 20(2), 101-125.

Reeves, T. C., & McKenney, S. (2019). Design-based research and educational technology. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology. EdTech Books.

Rizal, A., Yusup, D., & Voutama, A. (2020). Evaluasi faktor manfaat sistem lingkungan pembelajaran 3 dimensi berbasis multi-user virtual reality (MuVR). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 7(5), 895-904.

Sari, R. C., Pranesti, A., Solikhatun, I., Nurbaiti, N., & Yuniarti, N. (2024). Cognitive overload in immersive virtual reality in education: More presence but less learnt? Education and Information Technologies, 29(10), 12887-12909.

Simões, P. C., Moreira, A. C., & Dias, C. M. (2022). The "endless perspective" to university-industry-government relations. Triple Helix, 9(3), 247-274.

Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: A New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1711-1740.

Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, Article 74.

Souchet, A. D., Lourdeaux, D., Pagani, A., & Rebenitsch, L. (2023). A narrative review of immersive virtual reality's ergonomics and risks at the workplace: cybersickness, visual fatigue, muscular fatigue, acute stress, and mental overload. Virtual Reality, 27(1), 19-50.

Sudimantara, L. B., Baehaqi, L., Lian, A., & Lian, A. P. (2025). Multisensory CALL for Under-Resourced Universities and Schools in Indonesia. Palgrave Macmillan.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.

UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing.

UN DESA. (2025). World economic situation and prospects 2025. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/WESP-2025_WEB.pdf

van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. Routledge.

Weidenfeld, A., & Anusik, J. (2025). Exploring the systemic qualities and institutions of a Triple Helix municipal knowledge network.

European Planning Studies, 33(12), 2184-2206.

Won, M., Bailenson, J., & Lanier, J. (2023). Learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(1), 1-14.

Weech, S., Kenny, S., & Barnett-Cowan, M. (2019). Presence and cybersickness in virtual reality are negatively related: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 158.

Wu, B., Yu, X., & Gu, X. (2020). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head‐mounted displays on learning performance: A meta‐analysis. British journal of educational technology, 51(6), 1991-2005.

Xie, T., Li, Y., & Tang, Y. (2023). Effects of using immersive virtual reality for science education on learning outcomes: A randomized controlled pilot study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6), 1045-1056.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

Article ID

36673

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ridlo, S., Zulfikasari, S., Efrilianda, D. A., Rodiyah, & Tsong, C. K. . (2026). Virtual Reality-Enhanced Higher Education for Inclusive, Innovative, and Sustainable Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v15i2.36673