Promoting Scientific Literacy for Sustainable Development Through SCRIBO Web-Based Learning on Ecosystems and Environmental Change

Authors

  • Silwana Mumthaza Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Author
  • Dwi Priyo Utomo Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Author
  • Elly Purwanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Author
  • Yuni Pantiwati Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Author
  • Abdulkadir Rahardjanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v15i3.46455

Keywords:

scientific literacy, SCRIBO, web-learning, environment, ecosystem, technology, biology

Abstract

Digital learning platforms have been widely implemented in science education; however, limited empirical evidence explains how specific web-based platforms support measurable scientific literacy competencies in learning about ecosystems and environmental change. Students require structured learning experiences to interpret environmental data, evaluate scientific evidence, and connect biological concepts with real-world environmental problems. Therefore, this study examined changes in students' scientific literacy after implementing SCRIBO web-based learning on ecosystem and environmental change topics. This study employed a quantitative approach with a one-group pretest–posttest design involving 80 tenth-grade students from two classes. Scientific literacy was measured with a test developed from scientific literacy indicators, while observations and student interviews provided supporting data on students' learning experiences. Instrument validity and reliability were examined using Pearson's Product-Moment correlation and Cronbach's Alpha, respectively. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, paired-samples t-test, Cohen's d, and normalized gain (N-Gain). The results showed that the mean scientific literacy score increased from pretest to posttest, with a statistically significant difference. The within-group standardized change was large, while the N-Gain score indicated moderate improvement. Observation and interview findings also indicated that SCRIBO supported students in reading scientific texts, interpreting environmental data, evaluating evidence, and constructing evidence-based responses. The implementation of SCRIBO web-based learning was followed by higher scientific literacy scores in ecosystem and environmental change learning and showed potential to support students' scientific reasoning through structured digital learning activities. However, because this study used a one-group pretest–posttest design without a control group, the findings reflect within-group changes rather than definitive evidence of causal effectiveness. Further studies with comparison groups and broader samples are needed to strengthen evidence of SCRIBO's effectiveness in science learning.

References

Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023, 1–15.

Annuš, N., Takáč, O., Štempeľová, I., & Dancsa, D. (2023). Z and alpha generation teaching methods: digitalization of learning material. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 7(4), 224–229.

Anwar, Y., Widodo, A., Al Fatih, Z., Kartika, D., Ariska, M., & Yusliani, N. (2025). Education for Sustainable Development Based on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Biology Education: Assessing Teachers' Readiness. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(3).

Anwari, R., Pramesti, A. I., & Santoso, E. B. (2025). Implementation of Mathematics Teaching Module Based on Reflective Pedagogy Paradigm (RPP) at Taruna Nusantara High School. ITM Web of Conferences, 71, 01004.

Ardianto, D., Windiyani, T., Puteri, A., Aziz, H., Suwarma, I. R., & Yunus, S. R. (2026). STEM-Based Professional Development Model to Improve Teachers' Perceptions and Students' STEM Literacy: A Mixed Research Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 15(1).

Arsyad, S. (2024). Arguments in the methods section of journal articles in English language education published in high-impact journals. Discourse and Interaction, 17(1), 8–29.

Artayasa, I. P., Rosyidi, M. A., Kechik, M. A., & Yustiqvar, M. (2024). The impact of biopreneurship project-based science learning on students' entrepreneurial creativity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(3).

Bilici, S. C., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237-251.

Boateng, S. (2024). Physical sciences teachers' perspectives on implementing learning style-based instructional strategies in science classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 202–219.

Chan, B., Wei, R., & Fetherston, C. (2020). Innovative digital tools in EBP and information literacy education for undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Information Literacy, 14(2).

Cuong, D. H., Son, P. N., Kim Thuong, D. T., Thuy Linh, N. T., & Bich Hien, N. V. (2024). Building an Innovative Learning Ecosystem: A Model for Secondary Schools in Hanoi, Vietnam. TEM Journal, 2115–2126.

Darussyamsu, R., Lufri, L., Ahda, Y., Alberida, H., Ambiyar, A., & Samsudin, S. (2024). The Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning Model with RAHMA Syntax to Improve Prospective Biology Teachers' Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(4).

Delello, J. A., Hawley, H., McWhorter, R. R., Gipson, C. S., & Deal, B. (2018). Gamifying Education. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 13(4), 17–33.

Effendi, D. N., Irwandani, Anggraini, W., Jatmiko, A., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021, February). Bibliometric analysis of scientific literacy using VOS viewer: Analysis of science education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1796, No. 1, p. 012096). IOP Publishing.

Fitri, H. S. A., & Wiyarsi, A. (2025). Students’ chemical literacy improvement in culturally responsive teaching oriented toward green chemistry for stoichiometry topic. In EPJ Web of Conferences (Vol. 344, p. 01024). EDP Sciences.

Guerrero, G., & Sjöström, J. (2025). Critical scientific and environmental literacies: a systematic and critical review. Studies in Science Education, 61(1), 41–87.

Hammad, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Enabled Framework For Quality Education: A Mechanism To Leverage SDG Applications. World Sustainable Development Outlook, 22, 145–158.

Hartono, A., Djulia, E., Hasruddin, H., & Jayanti, U. N. A. D. (2023). Biology Students' Science Literacy Level on Genetic Concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 146–152.

Haviz, M., Nasrul, E., Azis, D., Maris, I. M., & Wahyudi, F. (2024). The Use of Socio-Scientific Issues to Promote Prospective Biology Teachers' Scientific Literacy and Research Skill Development. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(2).

Hikmah, N., Yohandri, F. A., Azhar, M., & Razak, A. (2025). Uncovering the potential of ethnoscience in science learning to improve students’ literacy: a systematic-literature review (2014–2024). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(3), 550-562.

Irwandi, I., Cahaya, M. A., Syahfitri, J., Waluyo, B., & Arsyad, S. (2025). Enhancing Biology Students' Scientific Literacy through the Critical Analysis and Discussion-Comparison with the Extended Learning Community Model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(4).

Jeronen, E., & Jeronen, J. (2026). Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Sustainable Education in Biology for Promoting Sustainability at Primary and Secondary Schools and in Teacher Education. Education Sciences, 16(2), 201.

Karyanto, P. (2019, June). Non-curricular strategies in the implementation of education for sustainable development in three prominent green schools in Indonesia. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1241, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing.

Lytras, M. D. (2023). An Integrated Transformative Learning Strategy at National Level: Bold Initiatives Toward Vision 2030 in Saudi Arabia. In Active and Transformative Learning in STEAM Disciplines (pp. 281–296). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Majid, I., Aboe, R. M., & Sari, A. N. (2024). Effects of biology learning models on metacognitive skills of senior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(3), 483-493.

Mikhailova, E. A., Post, C. J., Younts, G. L., & Schlautman, M. A. (2022). Connecting Students' Interests to a Learning Context: The Case of Ecosystem Services in STEM Education. Education Sciences, 12(5), 318.

Mumthaza, S., Utomo, D. P., Purwanti, E., Pantiwati, Y., & Rahardjanto, A. (2026). Toward A Golden Standard Of Education: Constructing The Outstanding School Model In Muhammadiyah Institutions. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 10(2), 970–984.

Muñoz-Galván, M., & Padilla, K. (2024). Pedagogical content knowledge about the sustainability of high school chemistry and biology teachers. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14(4), 652–665.

Nurkanti, M., Rahardja, U., Lubis. M., & Shukri, A. A. M. (2026). Deep Learning-Based Biology Learning With Ethnopedagogy And Local Wisdom To Support Sustainable Development Goals. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 15(1), 103–111.

Ortega-Sánchez, D., Alonso-Centeno, A., & Corbí, M. (2020). Socio-environmental problematic, end-purposes, and strategies relating to education for sustainable development (ESD) through the perspectives of Spanish secondary education trainee teachers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14).

Pan, Q., Zhou, J., Yang, D., Shi, D., Wang, D., Chen, X., & Liu, J. (2023). Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Deep Learning Research of Global Education. Sustainability, 15(4), 3097.

Pitiporntapin, S., Butkatanyoo, O., Piyapimonsit, C., Thanarachataphoom, T., Chotitham, S., & Lalitpasan, U. (2024). The Influence of Outdoor STEM Activities on Students' STEM Literacy: A Study of Elective Subject, Extracurricular Activities, and Student Club. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(2).

Rangkuti, A. N., Sitompul, L., Amran, A., Lubis, M. S., Hoiriyah, D., Sari, L. N. I., ... & Rambe, S. (2024). the Influence of Scientific-Based Numeracy Literacy Teaching Materials on Students’ Motivation and Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(4), 583-596.

Rosyidah, F., Susantini, E., Yuliani, Y., & Nisa', K. (2025). Local Wisdom and STEM in Science Education to Support SDG-4: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(4).

Rusydiyah, E. F., Asrohah, H., Basyir, K., Rahman, M. R., & Usagawa, T. (2024). Structural Model of Digital Transformation Readiness of Indonesian Rural and Urban Science Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(2).

Safkolam, R., Sofilan Madahae, & Phurkonni Saleah. (2024). Learning Retention of Preservice Science Teachers About the Nature of Science: an Explicit Reflective Inquiry-Based Learning and History of Scientist. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(3).

Sapriati, A., Rahayu, U., Sausan, I., Sekarwinahyu, M., & Anam, R. S. (2024). The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students' Critical Thinking in Biology Education Programs within Open and Distance Learning Systems. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(3).

Sari, W. A., Artika, W., Oktari, R. S., Safrida, Rahmatan, H., & Sasaki, D. (2025). Assessing Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Competencies and Environmental Empathy in Disaster and Environment Knowledge to Support SDGs 2030. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(1).

Savelyeva, T., & Park, J. (2024). Peace education for an equitable and sustainable world. International Journal of Chinese Education, 13(1).

Shukshina, L. V., Gegel, L. A., Erofeeva, M. A., Levina, I. D., Chugaeva, U. Y., & Nikitin, O. D. (2021). STEM and STEAM Education in Russian Education: Conceptual Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), 1–14.

Sofa, A. R., Anam, K., Ramadhani, K., Hasan, M., Amin, M. H. S., & Helmi, M. (2025). Pengembangan Penilaian Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Turnitin, Scribo AI, dan ChatGPT di Pesantren Raudlatul Hasaniyah. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 5(2).

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan. In Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sumarni, W., Sumarti, S. S. S., Dewi, S. H. D., & Imaduddin, M. (2025). Collaborative Ethno-STEAM Enriched Project-Based Learning (CoE-STEAM-PjBL): Its Impact On Prospective Science Teachers' Collaboration And Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(3).

Suzuki, R., Kato, J., & Yatani, K. (2020). ClassCode: an interactive teaching and learning environment for programming education in classrooms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08194.

Tay, H. Y. (2024). AI feedback: Moving beyond the hype to integrating it into a coherent feedback pedagogy. Routledge Open Research, 3, 26.

Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557–587.

Van Der Merwe, T. M. D., Serote, M., & Maloma, M. (2023). A Systematic Review of the Challenges of e-Learning Implementation in Sub-Saharan African Countries: 2016-2022. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21(5), 413-429.

Wibowo, F. C., Darman, D. R., Salim, F., Prahani, B. K., & Samsudin, A. (2026). Knowledgeable integration hybrid AI joins augmented reality and science literacy: Prospects and challenges. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102566.

Widyastuti, F., Sajidan, Saputro, S., Sutikno, Fadloli, & Probosari, R. M. (2026). Measuring the Effectiveness of the Indigenous-Based Experiential Learning Model on Pre-service Science Teachers' Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 15(1).

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29

Article ID

46455

How to Cite

Silwana Mumthaza, Utomo, D. P. ., Purwanti, E. ., Pantiwati, Y. ., & Rahardjanto, A. . (2026). Promoting Scientific Literacy for Sustainable Development Through SCRIBO Web-Based Learning on Ecosystems and Environmental Change. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v15i3.46455