The Importance of Habitus Changes in Community Empowerment (A Case Study of Milk and Fodder Processing in Slumut, Kumpulrejo Village, Salatiga, Central Java Province)
(1) Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
(2) Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
(3) Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Abstract
In carrying out economic empowerment, the role of actors as other parties is needed to help the community develops their potential. The role of the actor in Pierre Bourdieu's perspective consists of shared capital with habitus. This study would like to find out the relation between the success role of actors and the provision of economic, social, and cultural capital along with changes in habitus. This research was conducted in Slumut, Kumpulrejo Village, Salatiga. This location has two main potentials, namely milk and cattle fodder/concentrate feeds processing. The actors involved in economic empowerment in Slumut, Kumpulrejo Village, were the Department of Agriculture and Livestock from the government sector and the NGO Idea from the non-government sector. The two of them assist the Farmers Group of Margoraharjo 4. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with observation techniques, in-depth interviews, and document review. The results of this study indicate that although the actors have provided capital assistance, the community's habitus is difficult to change. Raising cattle is a hereditary job that forms habitus. They are content with what is now. People do not have enough effort to reach new markets and make variations in dairy products, which means they must have a new habitus. This makes it difficult for the government to support the development of milk and cattle fodder/concentrate feed processing businesses. The results of this study indicate that it is difficult for the community to change its habitus.Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adib, M. (2012). Agen dan Struktur dalam Pandangan Piere Bourdieu. Jurnal BioKultur, 1(2), 91-110.
Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital. Cultural theory: An anthology, 1, 81-93.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press.
Edkins, J., Williams, N. V., & Radike, T. (2010). Teori-teori Kritis Menantang Pandangan Utama Studi Politik Internasional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Fatmawati, N. I. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu dan Konsep Dasar Kekerasan Simbolik. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 12(1), 41-60.
Halim, A. (2014). Politik lokal: pola, aktor & alur dramatikalnya: perspektif teori Powercube, modal dan panggung. Lembaga Pengkajian Pembangunan Bangsa (LP2B).
Harker, R., Mahar, C., & Wilkes, C. (2009). Ranah Praktik: Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Kartasasmita, G. (1996). Power and Empowermant: Sebuah Telaah Mengenal Konsep Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
Lubis, A. Y. (2014). Postmodernisme: teori dan metode. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Moeljarto, V. (1996). Pemberdayaan Kelompok Miskin Melalui Program IDT. Prijono, O. S., & Pranarka, A. M. W. (Ed). Pemberdayaan: Konsep, kebijakan, dan implementasi. Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
Mubyarto, M. (2003). Teori Investasi dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dalam Ekonomi Pancasila. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 18(3).
Suharto, E. (2005). Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial. PT Refika Aditama.
Sulistiyani, A. T. (2004). Kemitraan dan model-model pemberdayaan. Gava Media.
Sumodiningrat, G. (2000). Wawasan dan Misi Pembangunan dengan Basis Pembedayaan Masyarakat.
Suryana, M. S. (2000). Ekonomi Pembangunan: Problematika dan Pendekatan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Forum Ilmu Sosial
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.