Tiga Faktor Bahasa Cinta Berdasarkan Sumber Bukti Empirik pada Individu Yang Telah Menikah di Bali, Indonesia
(1) Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Faculty of Health, School of Psychology and Counselling, Brisbane, Australia, Qld. Universitas Dhyana Pura, Program Studi Psikologi, Bali, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Dhyana Pura, Program Studi Psikologi, Bali, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Udayana, Program Studi Psikologi, Bali, Indonesia
Abstract
Lima Bahasa Cinta merupakan konsep yang memahami pengalaman merasa dicintai seseorang, namun penelitian yang komprehensif berdasarkan konteks Indonesia belum pernah dilakukan sebelumnya. Penelitian ini mengungkap keunikan pengalaman merasa dicintai individu yang telah menikah di Bali, Indonesia. Studi terbagi menjadi tiga bagian. Studi pertama merupakan uji awal reliabilitas dan penelusuran sumber bukti isi dengan melibatkan penilaian pakar. Studi kedua adalah wawancara dengan teknik Cognitive Interviewing untuk memperoleh sumber bukti proses respon. Studi ketiga adalah survey terhadap empat ratus individu yang telah menikah untuk menguji sumber bukti konsistensi internal. Analisis pakar dan wawancara menunjukkan perspektif yang detil terkait waktu yang dihabiskan bersama keluarga (Family Time) dan pemaknaan terhadap pentingnya nafkah lahir/batin pada relasi suami-istri. Analisis faktor dan measurement invariance menunjukkan tiga faktor khas penyusun bahasa cinta di Indonesia yaitu karakter pasangan, ekspresi rasa sayang, dan waktu yang dihabiskan bersama keluarga. Temuan ini menunjukkan keunikan bahasa cinta orang Indonesia yang berbeda dengan teori asal Lima Bahasa Cinta. Orang Indonesia merasa dicintai tidak terbatas pada perlakuan yang diterima pada diri mereka sendiri namun juga dari penilaian mereka terhadap karakter maupun perlakuan yang diberikan kepada orang lain seperti anggota keluarga.
Five Love Languages discusses the experience of feeling loved; however, a comprehensive study in Indonesian context has never been done previously. This study uncovered the uniqueness of feeling loved by married individuals who lived in Bali, Indonesia. The study involved three different parts. The first study evaluated the initial reliability and obtained the content-based evidence through the expert judgment. The second study was the Cognitive Interviewing to acquire the process-response-based evidence. The third study was a survey toward four hundred married individuals to gather the internal structure-based evidence.The expert judgment and interview analysis showed a more detailed perspective on the time spent with the family (Family Time) and the meaning of the spiritual/physical needs’ fulfillmen’. Factorial analysis and measurement invariance showed that there was three solutions factor of love languages in the Indonesian context. Those factors are feeling loved because of the spouse’s character, expressive affection, and time spent with family. This finding exhibited the uniqueness of Indonesian love languages and its differences to the original Five Love Languages. Indonesian feel loved not restricted to the treatment they receive but also based on their evaluation of their partner’s characters and their partner’s treatments to the others, such as family members.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Educational Research Association; American Psychological Association; National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC.
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Bali. (2018). Beberapa karakteristik penduduk menurut kabupaten atau kota di Bali hasil sensus penduduk. Retrieved October 31, 2018, from https://bps.bali.go.id
Barash, S. (2012). The Nine Phases of Marriage : How to Make It, Break It, Keep It. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.
Bland, A. M., & McQueen, K. S. (2018). The distribution of Chapman’s love languages in couples: An exploratory cluster analysis. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 7(2), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000102
Bunt, S., & Hazelwood, Z. J. (2017). Walking the walk, talking the talk: Love languages, selfâ€regulation, and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationship, 24, 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12182
Chaplin, T. M. (2015). Gender and emotion expression: A developmental contextual perspective. Emotion Review: Journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion, 7(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544408
Chapman, G. (2015). The five love languages: The secret to love that lasts. Chicago, IL: Northfield.
Chapman, G., & Southern, R. (2015). The five love languages for men: Tools for making a relationship great. Chicago, IL: Northfield.
Claxton, A., O’Rourke, N., Smith, J. Z., & DeLongis, A. (2012). Personality traits and marital satisfaction within enduring relationships: An intra-couple discrepancy approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 375-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511431183
Eck, K. M., Delaney, C. L., Olfert, M. D., Shelnutt, K. P., & Byrd-Bredbenner, C. (2019). “If my family is happy, then I am happyâ€: Quality-of-life determinants of parents of school-age children. SAGE Open Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119828535
Egbert, N., & Polk, D. (2006). Speaking the language of relational maintenance: A validity test of Chapman’s (1992) Five Love Languages. Communication Research Reports, 23(1), 19-26.
Franken, K., Lamers, S., Ten Klooster, P. M., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Westerhof, G. J. (2018). Validation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form and the dual continua model of well-being and psychopathology in an adult mental health setting. . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(12), 2187-2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22659
Frye, N., Ganong, L., Jensen, T., & Coleman, M. (2020). A dyadic analysis of emotion eegulation as a moderator of associations between marital conflict and marital satisfaction among first-married and remarried couples. Journal of Family Issues, 41(12), 2328-2355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20935504
Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of wellâ€being. Journal or Personality, 77(4), 1025-1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x
Gerlach, T. M., & Reinhard, S. K. (2018). Personality and romantic attraction. In Z.-H. V., & S. T. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_717-1
Hoffmann, H., Kessler, H., Eppel, T., Rukaniva, S., & Traue, H. C. (2010). Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men. Acta psychologica, 135(3), 278-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.012
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Krys, K., Capaldi, C., Zelenski, J., Park, J., Nader, M., Kocimska-Zych, A., . . . Uchida, Y. (2019). Family well-being is valued more than personal well-being: A four-country study. Curr Psychol (2019). . Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00249-2
Larsson, H., Tegern, M., Monnier, A., Skoglund, J., Helander, C., Persson, E., . . . Aasa, U. (2015). Content Validity Index and intra- and inter-rater reliability of a new Muscle Strength/Endurance Test Battery for Swedish soldiers. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0132185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132185
Liao, J., & Wang, L. (2017). The structure of the Chinese Material Value Scale: An Eastern cultural view. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1852. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01852
Lim, N. (2016). Cultural differences in emotion: Differences in emotional arousal level between the East and the West. Integrative Medicine Research, 5(2), 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2016.03.004
Mazzuca, S., Kafetsios, K., Livi, S., & Presaghi, F. (2019). Emotion regulation and satisfaction in long-term marital relationships: The role of emotional contagion. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(9), 2880-2895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518804452
Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
Ngoo, Y., Tey, N., & Tan, E. (2015). Determinants of life satisfaction in Asia. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 124(1), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0772-x
Nichols, A., Riffe, J., Kaczor, C., Cook, A., Crum, G., Hoover, A., . . . Smith, R. (2018). The Five Love Languages Program: An exploratory investigation points to improvements in relationship functioning. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 6(3), 40-58.
O'Hara, D. J., & Meteyard, J. (2011). The differentiation of self and the capacity to tolerate interpersonal difference and societal expectations: an exploratory study. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 2(2), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2011.557772
Permana, I. M., Surijah, E. A., & Aryanata, N. T. (2020). Bahasa cinta perempuan: Penelitian fenomenologik hal yang membuat istri merasa dicintai. Personifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi, 11(1), 48-78. https://doi.org/10.21107/personifikasi.v11i1.7291
Peterson, C. H., Peterson, N. A., & Powell, K. G. (2017). Cognitive interviewing for item development: Validity evidence based on content and response processes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339564
Picconi, L., Balsamo, M., Palumbo, R., & Fairfield, B. (2018). Testing factor structure and measurement invariance across gender with Italian Geriatric Anxiety Scale. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01164
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Reeves, T. D., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2016). Contemporary test validity in theory and practice: A primer for discipline-based education researchers. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(1), rm1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-08-0183
Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). The expression of compassionate love in everyday compassionate acts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(5), 651-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513507214
Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema, 26(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256
Surijah, E. A., Putri, K. D., Waruwu, D., & Aryanata, N. T. (2018). Studi psikologi indigenous konsep Bahasa Cinta. Intuisi: Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah, 10(2), 102-122.
Surijah, E., & Kirana, C. (2018). Five Love Languages Scale factor analysis. Makara Human Behavior Studies In Asia, 24(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.2201118
Surijah, E., & Sari, K. (2018). Five Love Languages and personality factors revisited. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 33(2), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v33i2.1579
Ugur, H., Constantinescu, P., & Stevens, M. (2015). Self-awareness and personal growth: Theory and application of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 89-110. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.6
Velotti, P., Balzarotti, S., Tagliabue, S., English, T., Zavattini, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Emotional suppression in early marriage: Actor, partner, and similarity effects on marital quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515574466
Wang, M., Willetta, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001
Watchravesringkan, K. (2012). Cross-cultural equivalence of materialistic values scale (MVS): An exploratory study between the United States and Thailand. Journal of Targeting, Measurement, and Analysis for Marketing, 20, 235-253. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2012.19
Whyte, S., Brooks, R. C., Chan, H. F., & Torgler, B. (2019). Do certain personality traits provide a mating market competitive advantage? Sex, offspring & the big 5. Personality and Individual Differences, 139(1), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.019
Willis, G. B., & Artino, A. R. (2013). What do our respondents think we're asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(3), 353-356. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1
Wu, M. S., Li, B., Zhu, L., & Zhou, C. (2019). Culture change and affectionate communication in China and the United States: Evidence from Google digitized books 1960-2008. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01110
Yucel, D. (2017). Work-family balance and marital satisfaction: The mediating effects of mental and physical health. Society and Mental Health, 7(3), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869317713069
Yurdugul, H. (2008). Minimum sample size for Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: A monte carlo study. Journal of Education, 35, 397-405.
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.