Reliabilitas dan Validitas Konstruk Alat Ukur Generic Conspiracist Beliefs (GCB) Versi Indonesia

Ulfah Annafi(1), Helli Ihsan(2), Diah Zaleha Wyandini(3), Sukma Adi Galuh Amawidyati(4),


(1) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(4) Prodi Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Dengan berkembangnya teknologi, masyarakat dihadapkan pada berbagai macam informasi, termasuk informasi yang mengandung konspirasi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji validitas dan reliabilitas alat ukur Generic Conspiracist Beliefs (GCB) yang diadaptasi dari Brotherton, French, dan Pickering ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Subjek dari penelitian ini adalah 209 Warga Negara Indonesia yang berusia 18 tahun ke atas. Analisis property psikometri dilakukan dengan menggunakan program JASP versi 0,14.1. Hasil uji exploratory factor analysis (EFA) menunjukkan bahwa alat ukur GCB memiliki dua faktor yaitu General Conspiracy dan Extraterrestrial Cover-Up. Hasil uji Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) menunjukkan bahwa alat ukur GCB memiliki 14 aitem yang fit dengan nilai indeks kecocokan model sebesar 0,067 (RMSEA), 0,904 (GFI), 0,934 (CFI) dan 0,921 (TLI). Selain itu, estimasi validitas konvergen menunjukkan bahwa alat ukur GCB yang diadaptasi kedalam Bahasa Indonesia memiliki nilai validitas yang baik (r=0,641; p<0,05) dan memiliki koefisien reliabilitas yang tinggi (alpha Cronbach sebesar 0,862). Dapat disimpulkan bahwa alat ukur GCB versi Indonesia memiliki properti psikometri yang baik.

The development of technology has led to an influx of information in society, some of which includes conspiracies. This research aims to assess the validity and reliability of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs (GCB) measuring instrument, which was adapted from Brotherton, French, and Pickering into Indonesian. The study involved 209 Indonesian citizens aged 18 years and over. The psychometric properties of the GCB measuring tool were analyzed using the JASP program version 0,14.1. The results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that the GCB instrument has two factors: General Conspiracy and Extraterrestrial Cover-Up. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results showed that the GCB measuring tool has 14 aitems that fit well with the model fit index values of 0,067 (RMSEA), 0,904 (GFI), 0,934 (CFI), and 0,921 (TLI). The convergent validity estimates also showed that the adapted Indonesian version of the GCB measuring tool has good validity values (r=0,641; p<0,05) and a high-reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha of 0,862). It can be concluded that the Indonesian version of the GCB measuring instrument has excellent psychometric properties

Keywords

Reliability; Validity; Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale

Full Text:

PDF

References

Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan Validitas edisi IV. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2017). Kontruksi Tes Kognitif. Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2018). Metode Penelitian Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar

Beaton;, D. E., Claire, B., Guillemin;, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428823

Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Original Research Article, 4.

Burhan, F. A. (2020). Langkah Kominfo Atasi Hoaks Konspirasi soal Corona. Retrieved from https://www.kominfo.go.id/: https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/28251/langkah-kominfo-atasi-hoaks-konspirasi-soal-corona/0/sorotan_media

Hasan, A. M. (2019, Juni 12). Mengapa Orang Takut pada Simbol Illuminati dan Teori Konspirasi. Retrieved from tirdo.id: https://tirto.id/mengapa-orang-takut-pada-simbol-illuminati-dan-teori-konspirasi-ecf1

Izad, R. (2018, September 16). Benarkah Vaksin Jadi Konspirasi Pemerintah untuk Melemahkan Umat Islam? Retrieved from Islami.co: https://islami.co/benarkah-vaksin-jadi-konspirasi-pemerintah-untuk-melemahkan-umat-islam/

Rachmayani, D., & Ramdhani, D. (2014). Adaptasi Bahasa dan Budaya Skala Psychology Well-Being. Seminar Nasional Psikometri, 253-268.

Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-aitem short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203 - 212.

Riana, F., & Hantoro, J. (2018, September 12). Penolakan Imunisasi MR, Petugas Diusir Hingga Diancam Parang. Retrieved from Tempo.co: https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1125955/penolakan-imunisasi-mr-petugas-diusir-hingga-diancam-parang

Shaleh, A. R. (2016). Analisis Faktor Skala Totalitas Kerja. Psychology & Humanity.

Suharsono, Y., & Istiqomah. (2014). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Skala Self Efficacy. Jurnah Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 2(1), 144-151.

Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Symposium on Conspiracy Theories Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227.

Suprapto. (2019). Presiden Jokowi Ungkap 6 Hoax Ini Paling Banyak Serang Pribadi-Keluarga. Retrieved from Wartakota: https://wartakota.tribunnews.com/2019/03/24/presiden-jokowi-ungkap-6-hoax-ini-paling-banyak-serang-pribadi-keluarga-hoax-ini-sangat-menghina

Thirlaway, V. (2017). Conspiracy: An Alarming Response to Peaceful Protest? The Journal of Criminal Law, 8(6), 455-466.

Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Atkinson, M. D. (2016). What Drives Conspiratorial Beliefs? The Role of Informational Cues and Predispositions. Political Research Quarterly.

van Prooijen, J. W., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618774270

van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memo Studies, 10(3), 323-333.

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Lorenz, A. V., & Erikson, P. (2005). Priciples of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaption Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures:Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaption. Value in health, 8.

Zein, R. A., Arinda, M. F., & Rikardi, A. A. (2020). The Enemy of ‘Ummah: Belief in Jewish conspiracy theories indirectly affected vaccination decisions.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.