Adaptasi Alat Ukur Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale (IMS) Versi Indonesia
(1) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjajaran
(2) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjajaran
Abstract
Kualitas mindfulness yang terdapat dalam hubungan interpersonal membutuhkan cakupan perhatian yang lebih luas dibandingkan dengan yang biasanya diukur dalam sebagian besar alat ukur mindfulness. Interpersonal mindfulness tidak hanya melibatkan kesadaran akan diri sendiri, namun juga kesadaran akan orang lain yang menjadi lawan dalam interaksi. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan alat ukur yang secara spesifik mengukur mindfulness dalam konteks hubungan interpersonal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengadaptasi Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale (IMS) ke bahasa Indonesia serta mengkaji reliabilitas dan validitas dari adaptasi tersebut. Adaptasi alat ukur ini melewati proses penerjemahan forward-backward, tinjauan dari para ahli, dan wawancara kognitif sebelum diadministrasikan pada 208 responden yang dipilih dengan teknik convenience sampling. Alat ukur secara keseluruhan memiliki reliabilitas yang sangat tinggi (α = 0,843) dan memiliki daya diskriminasi yang baik. Alat ukur juga memiliki validitas isi (Aiken’s V) yang cukup baik namun uji analisis faktor konfirmatori menunjukkan bahwa model tidak fit (p < 0,001, RMSEA = 0,079, TLI = 0,711, CFI = 0,736, SRMR = 0,111, dan Hoelter’s Critical N = 109,233). Setelah 10 itemdihapus, model menunjukkan model yang fit (p < 0,001, RMSEA = 0,055, TLI = 0,911, CFI = 0,927, SRMR = 0,064, dan Hoelter’s Critical N = 157,253) dengan reliabilitas yang tinggi (α = 0,783). Adaptasi alat ukur ini dapat digunakan untuk mengukur konstruk interpersonal mindfulness dengan menghapus 10 item. Untuk penelitian selanjutnya, peneliti disarankan untuk memperbaiki atau menambahkan item baru pada dimensi presence.
Mindfulness in interpersonal relationships includes a bigger scope than the ones usually measured in many mindfulness measurements tools. Interpersonal mindfulness doesn’t only involve the awareness of oneself, but also other people in interpersonal interactions. For this purpose, a measurement tool that specifically measures mindfulness in interpersonal relationships is needed. This study adapted Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale (IMS) to Indonesian and gathered reliability and validity evidence for the adaptation. This IMS adaptation went through the process of forward-backward translation, expert reviews, and cognitive interview before being administered to 208 respondents. The respondents are sampled by the convenience sampling technique. IMS adaptation is found to be a highly reliable measurement tool (α = 0.843) and most items has good discrimination index. IMS adaptation is also found to have sufficient content validity (Aiken’s V), but Confirmatory Factor Analysis shows that the adaptation doesn’t have good model fit (p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.079, TLI = 0.711, CFI = 0.736, SRMR = 0.111, and Hoelter’s Critical N = 109.233). After 10 items were deleted, the IMS adaptation shows acceptable model fit (p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.055, TLI = 0.911, CFI = 0.927, SRMR = 0.064, and Hoelter’s Critical N = 157.253) with a good reliability (α = 0.783). IMS in Indonesian version can be used to measure interpersonal mindfulness after deleting 10 items. For the next study, researchers are suggested to revise or add new items in the presence aspect.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and psychological measurement, 45(1), 131-142.
Alispahic, S., & Hasanbegovic-Anic, E. (2017). Mindfulness: Age and gender differences on a Bosnian sample. Psychological Thought, 10(1), 155-166.
Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi ke-2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27-45.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., ... & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230.
Carlson, L.E. & Brown, K.W. (2005). Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a cancer population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58, 29-33.
Christensen, L. B. (2007). Experimental Methodology (10th eds). United States: Pearson Education, Inc.
Duncan, L. G. (2007). Assessment of mindful parenting among families of early adolescents: Development and validation of the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale (Unpublished Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University).
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of Educational Measurement. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Frank, J. L., Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2016). Validation of the mindfulness in teaching scale. Mindfulness, 7(1), 155–163.
Greco, L. A., Baer, R. A., & Smith, G. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 606.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Huston, D. (2016). Communicating mindfully: Mindfulness-based communication and emotional intelligence. Mason, 535, OH: Cenage Learning.
International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101-134.
Jahanian, M., & Sepehri Shamloo, Z. (2017). The Effect of Mindfulness on Marital Satisfaction: Emotional Intelligence as a Mediation. Iranina J Psychiatric Nurs, 5(3), 1-6.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Dell.
Khairani, R. N., Cahyadi, S., & Susanto, H. (2021). Studi Validitas dan Reliabilitas Mindfulness in Teaching Scale Indonesia. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 55-63.
Kula, S. (2011). Statistical analysis criterias for structural equation modeling. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/269808882.
Li, M. J., Black, D. S., & Garland, E. L. (2016). The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS): A process measure for evaluating mindfulness-based interventions. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 6-15.
Manusov, V., & Harvey-Knowles, J. A. (2015). On being (and becoming) mindful: One pathway to greater resilience. In G. Beck & T. Socha (Eds.), Communicating hope and resilience across the lifespan (pp. 15–33). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Manusov, V., Stofleth, D., Harvey, J. A., & Crowley, J. P. (2018). Conditions and consequences of listening well for interpersonal relationships: Modeling active-empathic listening, social-emotional skills, trait mindfulness, and relational quality. International Journal of Listening, 34(2), 110-126.
Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Shi, D. (2017). Effect Sizes of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models: Standardized Residual Covariances and Residual Correlations. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 13(Supplement 1), 23–30.
Mas’Udah, D. (2016). Mindfulness dalam komunikasi antarbudaya (studi deskriptif pada peserta Indonesia–Poland Cross-Cultural Program). Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 7(2).
Medvedev, O. N., Pratscher, S. D., & Bettencourt, A. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal mindfulness scale using Rasch analysis. Mindfulness, 11, 2007-2015.
Muhid, A., Suhadiyanto, S., & Nurhidayat, D. (2015). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Psikologi. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel.
Nurfadillah, A. (2017). Peran trait mindfulness dan empati terhadap perilaku bullying pada remaja SMA serta tinjauannya menurut Islam (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas YARSI).
Orue, I., Larrucea-Iruretagoyena, M., Royuela-Colomer, E., & Calvete, E. (2023). The Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale: Examining the reliability and validity in Spanish parents. Mindfulness, 14(2), 482-492.
Pan, J., Liang, Y., Zhou, H., & Wang, Y. (2019). Mindful parenting assessed in Mainland China: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale. Mindfulness, 10, 1629-1641.
Pratscher, S. D., Rose, A. J., Markovitz, L., & Bettencourt, A. (2018). Interpersonal mindfulness: Investigating mindfulness in interpersonal interactions, co-rumination, and friendship quality. Mindfulness, 9(4), 1206-1215.
Pratscher, S. D., Wood, P. K., King, L. A., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2019). Interpersonal mindfulness: Scale development and initial construct validation. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1044-1061.
Prihandini, G. R. (2019). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Mindful Parenting untuk Orang Tua dari Remaja di Indonesia. Jurnal Psikogenesis, 7(2), 215-227.
Raes, F., & Williams, J. M. G. (2010). The relationship between mindfulness and uncontrollability of ruminative thinking. Mindfulness, 1(4), 199-203.
Ramasubramanian, S. (2017). Mindfulness, stress coping and everyday resilience among emerging youth in a university setting: a mixed methods approach. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(3), 308-321.
Ricarte, J. J., Ros, L., Latorre, J. M., & Beltrán, M. T. (2015). Mindfulness-based intervention in a rural primary school: Effects on attention, concentration, and mood. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 8(3), 258-270.
Saleh, U. (2008). Pengaruh pelatihan mindfulness terhadap peningkatan empati perawat (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2013). State Mindfulness Scale (SMS): development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1286.
Turnomo, R. (2004). Mindfulness dalam komunikasi antaretnis. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi Thesis, 3(2), 97-119.
Willis, G. B. (2015). Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design. Oxford University Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.