Evaluation of the Management of Performing Arts Creation Learning
(1) Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar, Indonesia
(2) Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar, Indonesia
(3) Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(4) Institut Seni Budaya Indonesia Bandung, Indonesia
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning management in the creation of performing arts at the Performing Arts Education Study Program at ISI Denpasar. The evaluation results of the learning management in the performing arts creation can be used as input for improving the learning management related to performing arts courses, which in turn can enhance students’ competence in the field of performing arts. The learning of performing arts creation is directed towards the development of nationalism among the next generation towards the cultural heritage of the nation in the field of arts. The research design used is an evaluative research design with the CIPP model. The research subjects consist of program managers, lecturers of the performing arts creation course, and students who have taken or are currently taking the performing arts creation course. Data collection is done using questionnaires, observations, and interviews. The data is analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis. The research findings indicate that: (1) the quality of the Context Aspect of the learning management in the Performing Arts Education at ISI Denpasar is classified as good; (2) the quality of the Input Aspect of the learning management in the Performing Arts Education at ISI Denpasar is classified as fairly good; (3) the quality of the Process Aspect of the learning management in the Performing Arts Education at ISI Denpasar is classified as not good or poor; and (4) the quality of the Product Aspect of learning management in the Performing Arts Education at ISI Denpasar is classified as fairly good improved; (2) maximizing the use of technology in the learning process; (3) facilitating collaborative learning among students from different study programs or universities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abel, T. (2021). Laboratory tests and analysis of CIPP epoxy resin internal liners used in pipelines-part II: Comparative analysis with the use of the FEM and engineering algorithms. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 43(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0007
Alam, S., & Nur Zuama, S. (2019). Profesionalisme Guru Seni Budaya di Sekolah. GETER : Jurnal Seni Drama, Tari dan Musik, 2(2), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.26740/geter.v2n2.p12-21
Alexsandra, Ganefri, & Usmeldi. (2019). Evaluation of Vocational School Pratic Program CIPP Model. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 3(3), 180. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v3i3.21860
Bellini, E., Piroli, G., & Pennacchio, L. (2019). Collaborative know-how and trust in university–industry collaborations: Empirical evidence from ICT firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(6), 1939–1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9655-7
Braun, A. (2021). CIPP Design Reconciliation: How It Works and Why It’s Important. Pipelines 2021: Construction and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2021 Conference, Query date: 2023-03-26 10:15:55, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483626.01
Dantes, N. (2021). Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Undiksha Press.
Dzvimbo, M. A. (2022). Promoting sustainable development goals: Role of higher education institutions in climate and disaster management in Zimbabwe. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/JAMBA.V14I1.1206
Hariyanto, A. B., & Jannah, U. R. (2020). Revolusi guru dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Sigma, 5(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.36513/sigma.v5i2.771
Kunttu, L. (2019). Balancing learning and knowledge protection in university-industry collaborations. Learning Organization, 26(2), 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-06-2018-0103
Li, Y. (2022). The Evaluation Index System of Teaching Quality in Colleges and Universities: Based on the CIPP Model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022 (Query date: 2023-03-26 10:15:55). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3694744
Mahoney, J. T. (2002). The relevance of Chester I. Barnard’s teachings to contemporary management education: communicating the aesthetics of management. International Journal Organization Theory and Behavior, 5(1-2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1081/OTB-120004243
Masaong, A. K. (2019). Character education management model development based on multiple intelligence for strengthening “student-ethos-transformation” in the revolutionary era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(4), 692–703.
Papadopoulou, A. (2019). Art, Technology, Education: Synergy of Modes, Means, Tools of Communication. Education Sciences, 9(3), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030237
Ramadhan, K., & Handayaningrum, W. (2020). Manajemen pendidikan seni terhadap anak jalanan di sanggar pensi kabupaten Bondowoso. Jurnal Pendidikan Sendratasik, 9(2), 206-218.
Richardson, M. (2020). Creative connections: The power of contemporary art to explore european citizenship. London Review of Education, 18(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.2.10
Rosa, A. T. R., & Mujiarto. (2020). Teacher development potential (Creativity and innovation) education management in engineering training, coaching and writing works through scientific knowledge intensive knowledge based on web research in the industrial revolution and society. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p161
Rothdiener, M., Griewatz, J., Meder, A., Alessandro, D., Obertacke, U., Kirschniak, A., Borucki, K., Koenig, S., Ruesseler, M., Steffens, S., Steinweg, B., & Lammerding-Koeppel, Mm. (2020). Surgeons’ participation in the development of collaboration and management competencies in undergraduate medical education. PLoS ONE, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233400
Savchenko, L. (2020). Management of the development of the role position of future educators in higher education institutions. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(5), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.11.5.2020.042
Setiawan, R., Aman, A., Prasojo, L. D., & Mehta, K. (2021). Evaluation of hybrid learning in college using CIPP model. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i2.46348
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Jakarta: Alfabeta
Suherman, A., & Winarso, W. (2021). Teaching-Material of Elementary Social Studies; Constructing a Powerful Approach to Local Wisdom in Indonesia. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 1(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.58557/ijeh.v1i1.12
Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086
Vaintraub, M., Kamenska, I., & Bokshyts, O. (2020). Strategic risk management in the development of university education in ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.33271/NVNGU/2020-5/143
Vali, L. (2022). The requirements of developing programs for the management of non-communicable diseases in Iran based on the CIPP model: A qualitative study. Journal of Health Research, 36(6), 1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHR-11-2020-0546
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.