Description of Junior High School Students in Generlizing Patterns Based on Semiotic Perspective
(1) Research Center of Science Education, Technology, and Mathematics (e-SisTeM) Major of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher and Education Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
(2) Research Center of Science Education, Technology, and Mathematics (e-SisTeM) Major of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher and Education Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
(3) Research Center of Science Education, Technology, and Mathematics (e-SisTeM) Major of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher and Education Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Abstract
Generalization is a reasoning in making conclusions that contain symbolism and are general. Semiotics have an important role in the process of generalization, in which generalize the pattern not only seen from the work of students but based on the process of students in understanding and making things. This paper aims to describe how junior high school students generalize patterns based on semiotic perspectives. The type of this research is descriptive qualitative in which data obtained by test, interview and observation. The subjects consist of 3 students of grade VIII junior high school students of 1 high, moderate, and low mathematics students. The findings of this research are at the factual stage the three subjects have the same gesture and word. But in the contextual phase each subject has a different way or step of work in accordance with the understanding possessed by each subject and the last stage of the symbolization of the three subjects can create the same formula. This paper is expected to be used as a reference for teachers to understand the ability of students in the generalization process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baryadi, I. P. 2007. Teori Ikon Bahasa: Salah Satu Pintu Masuk ke Dunia Semiotika. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma
Caraher, D.W., Martinez, M.V., dan Schielmann, A.D. 2008. Early Algebra and Mathematical Generalization. ZDM Mathematics Education. 40:3-22
Depdiknas. 2006. Permendiknas No 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi. Jakarta : Depdiknas.
Ernest, P. 2006. A Semiotic Perspective of Mathematical Activity: The Case of Number. Educational Studies in Mathematics.61:67-101
Gatot Muhsetya, dkk.(2008). Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Jakarta:Universitas Terbuka.
Hidayat, A.A. 2009. Filsafat Bahasa: Mengungkap Hakikat Bahasa,Makna, dan Tanda. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Oers, B.V. 2010. Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educ Stud Math. 74:23-37
Radford, L. 2007. Iconicity and Contraction: A Semiotic Investigation of Form of Algebraic Generalizations of Patterns in Different Contexs. ZDM Mathematics Education. DOI 10.1007/s 11858-007-0061-0.
Radford, L. 2003. Gestures, Speech, and the Sprouting of Signs: A Semiotic-Cultural Approach to Students’ Types of Generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 5(1),37-70.
Radford, L. 2006. Algebraic Thinking and The Generalization of Pattern: A Semioyic Perspective. Proceedings of the 28 annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psycology of Mathematics Education. Vol 1.1-21
Sari, N. I. P. 2016. Diagnosis Kesulitan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Pola Bilangan Dan Pemberian Scaffolding. [Online]. Tersedia: https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/6979
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Researcheran Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Surajiyo., Sugeng.A., dan Sri Andiani. 2005. Dasar-Dasar Logika. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Van de Walle, J. A. 2008.Matematika Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga
Vogel, R. 2005. Patterns: A Fundamental Idea of Mathematical Thinking and Learning. ZDM vol. 37.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.