Institutionalizing Customary Court in Indonesian Justice System as an Effort to Realize Access to Justice Right for Indigenous People

Anti Mayastuti, Luthfiyah Trini H, Diana Lukitasari

Abstract

This study aims to find customary court institution form in an effort to reinstitute customary court in Indonesia. This research is a prescriptive doctrinal legal research, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The data used is secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, while data analysis technique used is qualitative non-positivistic using hermeneutic interpretation method. Customary disputes are included in the realm of material law that occur in the space of indigenous peoples, if they are resolved by a different formal legal institution, namely the general court as regulated in Law no. 21 of 2001 on Special Autonomy for Papua Province. In principle, the customary court is the last judiciary based on customary law, but efforts to obtain justice (access to justice) and the truth are the human rights of everyone. Therefore, everyone who seeks justice must be interpreted as the right to obtain fair recognition, guarantee, protection and legal certainty and be treated equally before the law. The idea of reviving customary justice is important because as a body of customary courts it is in charge of adjudicating customary law disputes that occur in the community.

Keywords

Customary court, Law no. 21 year 2021, Access to justice

Full Text:

PDF

References

Attamimi, A. H. (1990). Peranan Keputusan Presiden Repubik Indonesia Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara. Universitas Indonesia.

Gandhi, L. M. (1995). Harmonisasi Hukum Menuju Hukum yang responsif, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap FH-UI, dalam Perumusan Harmonisasi Hukum tentang Metodologi Harmonisasi Hukum.

Hamidi, J. (2011). Hermeneutika Hukum : Sejarah, Filsafat dan Metode Tafsir. UB Press.

Herowati Poesoko. (2014). Paradigma Pengadilan Adat dalam Sistem Peradilan Perdata di Indonesia.

Howley, P. (2007). Incorporating Custom Law into State Law in Melanesia. In Queensland : International Diploman in Restorative Justice. Queens University.

Huda, N. (2008). UUD 1945 dan Gagasan Amandemen Ulang. Rajawali Press.

Irene H. Muslim. (1991). Peradilan Adat dalam Masyarakat Dayak di Kalimantan Barat, Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas tanjung Pura.

Kusnu Goesniadhie S. (2006). Harmonisasi Hukum dalam Perspektif Perundang-Undangan, Lex Specialis Suatu Masalah. JP Books.

Leyh, G. (2011). Pendidikan Hukum dan Kehidupan Publik”, dalam

Gregory Leyh, ed., Hermeneutika Hukum : Sejarah, Teori dan Praktek, terjemahan M. Khozim dari judul asli Legal Hermeneutics. Nusa Media.

M. Khoidin. (2015). Eksistensi Pengadilan Adat dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia : Eksistensi Hukum Adat dan Pengadilan Adat di Indonesia.

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana.

Maxwell, G., & Hayes, H. (2006). Restorative Justice Developments in the Pacific Region: A Comprehensive Survey. Contemporary Justice Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580600784929

Mohammad Jamin. (2014). Peradilan Adat Pergeseran Politik Hukum, Perspektif Undang-Undang Otonomi Khusus Papua. Graha Ilmu.

Rato, D. (2013). Mekanisme dan Praktek Peradilan Adat dalam Menangani Kasus Hukum dengan Pihak Lain, disampaikan dalam FGD Bada Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Rato, D. (2015). Prinsip, Mekanisme dan Praktek Peradilan Adat dalam Menangani Kasus Hukum dengan Pihak Lain.

Soleman B. taneko. (1987). Hukum Adat Suatu Pengantar Awal dan Prediksi Masa Mendatang. Eresco.

Stephens, M. C. S. (2009). Menemukan Titik Keseimbangan: Mempertimbangkan Keadilan Non-negara di Indonesia.

Sulistiyono, A. (2018). Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia dalam Teori dan Praktek. Pranata Media Group.

Tadiar, A. (1998). Institutionalising Traditional Dispute Resolution the Philippine Experience.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v7i2.35087

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.