Utilization of Neuroimaging in Criminal Justice: Unveiling Truth Through Brain Technology

Achmad Cholidin, Zico Junius Fernando, Mikhael Feka

Abstract

The integration of neuroimaging technology in criminal justice worldwide has opened new avenues for understanding the neural underpinnings of criminal behavior and improving the accuracy of legal processes. This paper explores the application of neuroimaging techniques, such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET), in the context of criminal investigations and trials. Neuroimaging provides insight into brain function related to intent, deception, memory, and cognitive control, which is critical in determining culpability and assessing mental states. By reviewing case studies and current research, this study evaluates the potential benefits and ethical challenges of using neuroimaging as evidence in court. The findings suggest that although neuroimaging holds the promise of improving the objectivity and reliability of criminal justice, its use should be conducted with caution due to legal, ethical, and technical limitations. The paper concludes with recommendations for the responsible integration of neuroimaging into legal practice to ensure fairness and protect the rights of individuals. The implications of these findings for criminal law enforcement in Indonesia are also discussed, highlighting the potential of applying neuroimaging techniques to improve the fairness and effectiveness of the legal system.

Keywords

Neuroimaging, Criminal Justice, Legal Evidence, Brain Technology, Mental State Assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akhmad, Akhmad, Zico Junius Fernando, and Papontee Teeraphan. “Unmasking Illicit Enrichment: A Comparative Analysis of Wealth Acquisition Under Indonesian, Thailand and Islamic Law.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 8, no. 2 (2023): 899–934. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69332.

appliedradiology.com. “Michael E. Phelps – PET Pioneer.” appliedradiology.com, 2024. https://appliedradiology.com/articles/michael-e-phelps-pet-pioneer-honored-by-snmmi.

Aronson, Jay D. “The Law’s Use of Brain Evidence.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (October 26, 2010): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-LAWSOCSCI-102209-152948.

Baskin, Joseph H, Judith G Edersheim, and Bruce H Price. “Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Neuroimaging in the Courtroom.” American Journal of Law & Medicine 33, no. 2–3 (2007): 239–69. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/009885880703300205.

Batts, Shelley. “Brain Lesions and Their Implications in Criminal Responsibility.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 27, no. 2 (March 1, 2009): 261–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSL.857.

Beeck, Hans Op de, and Chie Nakatani. Introduction to Human Neuroimaging. Cambridge Fundamentals of Neuroscience in Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781316847916.

Brown, Teneille, and Emily Murphy. “Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant’s Past Mental States.” Stanford Law Review 62, no. 4 (April 2010): 1119–1208.

Energy, U.S. Department of, and Molecular Nuclear Medicine Legacy. “History of PET and MRI.” U.S. Department of Energy Molecular Nuclear Medicine Legacy, 2009. https://medicalsciences.energy.gov/historypetmri.shtml.

Feng, Ching-Mei, Shalini Narayana, Jack L Lancaster, Paul A Jerabek, Thomas L Arnow, Fang Zhu, Li Hai Tan, Peter T Fox, and Jia-Hong Gao. “CBF Changes During Brain Activation: FMRI Vs. PET.” NeuroImage 22, no. 1 (2004): 443–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.017.

Greene, Edith, and Brian S. Cahill. “Effects of Neuroimaging Evidence on Mock Juror Decision Making.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 30, no. 3 (May 1, 2012): 280–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSL.1993.

Karianga, Hendra, and Zico Junius Fernando. “The Damage of the Shadow Economy: The Urgency of Addressing Foreign Bribery in Indonesia.” Pakistan Journal of Criminology 16, no. 2 (April 1, 2024): 783–96. https://doi.org/10.62271/PJC.16.2.783.796.

Kelly Lowenberg. “Neuroscience and Sentencing: Diminished Culpability and Capacity for Change.” Stanford Law School Blog, 2009. https://law.stanford.edu/2009/12/14/neuroscience-and-sentencing-diminished-culpability-and-capacity-for-change/.

Kristanto, Kiki, Zico Junius Fernando, and Papontee Teeraphan. “Anticorruption School : Solution to Building the Integrity of Judges.” IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) 8, no. 2 (2023): 193–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v8i2.

Langleben, Daniel D., and Jane Campbell Moriarty. “Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law, and Policy Collide.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 19, no. 2 (2013): 222–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0028841.

Litvin, L. “A Critical Reflection on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Imaging Method in Neuroscientific Research.” Clinical Neurophysiology 137 (2022): 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2022.01.057.

Meltzer, Carolyn C., G. Sze, K. S. Rommelfanger, K. Kinlaw, J. D. Banja, and P. R. Wolpe. “Guidelines for the Ethical Use of Neuroimages in Medical Testimony: Report of a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference.” American Journal of Neuroradiology 35, no. 4 (April 1, 2014): 632–37. https://doi.org/10.3174/AJNR.A3711.

Mitra, Manu. “Brain Disorders and Its Treatment.” Archives in Biomedical Engineering & Biotechnology 1, no. 3 (2019): 4–7. https://doi.org/10.33552/abeb.2018.01.000512.

Mori, Susumu, and Jiangyang Zhang. “Principles of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Its Applications to Basic Neuroscience Research.” Neuron 51, no. 5 (September 7, 2006): 527–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.012.

Moriarty, Jane Campbell, Daniel D. Langleben, and James M. Provenzale. “Brain Trauma, PET Scans and Forensic Complexity.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 31, no. 6 (November 1, 2013): 702–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSL.2089.

Newberg, Andrew, Daniel Monti, Aleeze Moss, and Abass Alavi. “Positron Emission Tomography in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 22, no. 1 (March 1, 2012): 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/IMA.22004.

Nugroho, Bagas Setyo, Nurul Muarifah, Terysa Puji Rahayu, and Riska Andi Fitriono. “Pancasila as Law Enforcement Ethics.” JETISH: Journal of Education Technology Information Social Sciences and Health 1, no. 2 (January 2, 2023): 209–14. https://doi.org/10.57235/JETISH.V1I2.134.

Okliyani, Windicha, Septia Riska Maharani, Alfaridho Setiadji Nugroho, Muhammad Aufal Ihsan, and Puspika Sari. “Pancasila as The Foundation of The State in The Perspective of The Democratic State of Law’s Ideals.” Literasi Hukum 7, no. 2 (October 31, 2023): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.31002/LH.V7I2.7743.

Owen, Adrian M, Russell Epstein, and Ingrid S Johnsrude. “FMRI: Applications to Cognitive Neuroscience.” In Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Introduction to Methods, edited by Peter Jezzard, Paul M Matthews, and Stephen M Smith, 312–329. Oxford University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192630711.003.0017.

Polubinskaya, Svetlana V. “Use of Neuroscience in Criminal Law Doctrine and Criminal Sentencing.” Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS 14, no. 5 (December 12, 2019): 9–37. https://doi.org/10.35427/2073-4522-2019-14-5-POLUBINSKAYA.

Riky Sembiring. “Keadilan Pancasila Dalam Persepektif Teori Keadilan Aristoteles.” Jurnal Aktual Justice 3, no. 2 (December 15, 2018): 139–55. https://doi.org/10.47329/AKTUALJUSTICE.V3I2.539.

Schaich Borg, Jana, Catherine Hynes, John Van Horn, Scott Grafton, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. “Consequences, Action, and Intention as Factors in Moral Judgments: An FMRI Investigation.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, no. 5 (May 1, 2006): 803–17. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.803.

Serah, Yenny Aman, Zico Junius Fernando, and Temmy Hastian. “Virtual Police: Guardians of Security and Consumer Protection in the Era of Electronic Information and Transactions.” Pakistan Journal of Criminology 16, no. 2 (April 1, 2024): 1061–80. https://doi.org/10.62271/PJC.16.2.1061.1080.

Soares, José M., Ricardo Magalhães, Pedro S. Moreira, Alexandre Sousa, Edward Ganz, Adriana Sampaio, Victor Alves, Paulo Marques, and Nuno Sousa. “A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 10 (November 1, 2016): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNINS.2016.00515/BIBTEX.

Sweet, Lawrence H. “Brain Imaging in Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience.” In Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, edited by Ronald A Cohen and Lawrence H Sweet, 37–47. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6373-4_3.

Teicher, Martin H., and Jacqueline A. Samson. “Annual Research Review: Enduring Neurobiological Effects of Childhood Abuse and Neglect.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 57, no. 3 (March 1, 2016): 241–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCPP.12507.

Vijay Khare, Shaurya Singh, Neha Mehra, Shamim Akhter, and Chakresh Kumar Jain. “FMRI: A Benediction to Neuroscience.” International Journal of Robotics and Automation Technology 5 (2018): 14–22. https://doi.org/10.31875/2409-9694.2018.05.3.

Villringer, Arno. “Optical Imaging of Brain Function and Metabolism 2: Physiological Basis and Comparison to Other Functional Neuroimaging Methods.” In Understanding Functional Neuroimaging Methods Based on Neurovascular Coupling, edited by Arno Villringer and Ulrich Dirnagl, 177–93. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0056-2_20.

Xue, Gui, Chuansheng Chen, Zhong-Lin Lu, and Qi Dong. “Brain Imaging Techniques and Their Applications in Decision-Making Research.” Xin Li Xue Bao. Acta Psychologica Sinica 42, no. 1 (February 2010): 120–37. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00120.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v9i2.50316

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.