Actio Pauliana as the Rights Protection Efforts for Creditors in the Bankruptcy Case

Puja Dwi Pangestu


The implementation of a debt agreement is often found in bad faith by the debtor where the debtor is unable to pay off his debts. When the debtor is deemed unable to pay off all of his debt, the debtor can voluntarily submit palitit to the Commercial Court. Submission of bankruptcy can also be applied by creditors, of course, bankruptcy permits by debtors or creditors must fulfill the conditions mandated in the bankruptcy law. When debtors are declared bankrupt, all assets owned by the debtor are collateral for their debts.

However, in its implementation, it is often found that ill will is carried out by the debtor, namely when the debtor feels that he is no longer able to repay his debts, the debtor transfers his assets to the third party for his own benefit. To protect the interests of each creditor then curator can make an action with actio pauliana, , Actio Pauliana is cancellation of all of the legal action of the assets taken by debtors. The research objective of this article is to know and understand the bankruptcy determination process based on the Bankruptcy Act and how actio pauliana attempts to protect the rights of each creditor.



Debt Agreement; Bankruptcy; Actio Pauliana

Full Text:



Rianto, Adi. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Hukum. Jakarta: Granit.

Nating, Imran. (2005). Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Jakarta: Edisi Revisi. Cet. 2, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada

Sofwan, S. S. (1975). Hukum perdata: Hukum Perundangan . Bag 8, Liberty

Sukirno, T. (2001). Tanggung Jawab Kurator Terhadap Harta Pailit dan Penerapan Actio Pauliana. Bandung: Alumni

Syahrin, M. Alvi. (2017). Actio Pauliana: Konsep Hukum dan Problematikanya. Jurnal Lex Librum, Vol. IV, No. 1, Desember 2017, hal. 605 – 616.

Sunarmi. ( 2010). Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Edisi 2, Sofmedia.

Anisah, Siti. (2009). Perlindungan Terhadap Kepentingan Kreditor Melalui Actio Pauliana, Jurnal Hukum No. 2, Vol. 16, 205-221.

Kartini Mulyadi, (2001), Kepailitan dan Penyelesaian Utang Piutang dalam Rudhy A. Lontoh (ed), Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung.

Satrio, J (1997). Hukum Jaminan, Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Hak Tanggungan, Buku I, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Tamba, F. R. (2017). Analisis Putusan Pailit Nomor: 02/pailit/2009/pn. niaga. smg terhadap Undang-undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 1(1).


  • There are currently no refbacks.