The Comparison Between Indonesia and The Netherlands Regarding Commercial Dispute Arbitration

Christ Sella; Januari Nasya Ayu Taduri

doi:10.15294/jpcl.v7i1.30314

The Comparison Between Indonesia and The Netherlands Regarding Commercial Dispute Arbitration

Christ Sella⁽¹⁾, Januari Nasya Ayu Taduri⁽²⁾,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v7i1.30314

(1) National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

In the dynamic realm of business, entrepreneurs continually encounter a multitude of risks and challenges that have the potential to lead to disputes among various parties involved. To effectively navigate such situations, businesspeople often prefer to adopt alternative dispute resolution methods, such as arbitration, rather than opting for traditional litigation. This preference is primarily motivated by a desire to protect and maintain the company's valuable reputation and goodwill. In Indonesia, the practice of arbitration dates back to the colonial era and is currently governed by The Act Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. In this paper, the author aims to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of arbitration mechanisms in Indonesia and the Netherlands. The main objective is to assess the progress of arbitration in Indonesia in comparison to other countries and explore innovative arbitration mechanisms that can be implemented to further enhance the effectiveness of dispute resolution. To achieve this goal, the research methodology employed for this legal analysis is normative legal research with a comparative approach. By utilizing this approach, the study seeks to gain a deeper understanding of the existing arbitration practices in both Indonesia and the Netherlands, identify strengths and weaknesses, and propose potential areas for improvement. Overall, this study endeavors to shed light on the advancements made in the field of arbitration in Indonesia while drawing insights from international practices. By exploring and adopting novel arbitration mechanisms, the hope is to contribute to the development and refinement of Indonesia's dispute resolution landscape for the benefit of businesses and stakeholders alike.

Keywords

Arbitration; Commercial Disputes; Indonesia; The Netherlands.

References

Ab. Rahman, R., and Y. Rahman. “The ‘Midas Touch’ Turns Green in Putrajaya.” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2495/SC140551.

Aziz, Muhammad Faiz, and Muhamamd Arif Hidayah. “PERLUNYA PENGATURAN KHUSUS ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ODR) DI INDONESIA UNTUK FASILITASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA E-COMMERCE.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.449.

Azwar, Muhammad. “Prospek Penerapan Online Dispute Resolution Dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia.” Media Iuris 2, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v2i2.13912.

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504.

Bosters, Thijs. Collective Redress and Private International Law in the EU. Collective Redress and Private International Law in the EU, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-186-9.

Dianari, Rr. Getha Fety. “PENGARUH E-COMMERCE TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI INDONESIA.” Bina Ekonomi 22, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.26593/be.v22i1.3619.45-64.

Emerson, Frank D. “History of Arbitration Practice and Law.” Cleveland State Law Review 19, no. 1 (1970).

Entriani, Anik. “Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia.” An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 3, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21274/an.2017.3.2.277-293.

Haynes, Jeffrey, Peter Hough, Shahin Malik, and Lloyd Pettiford. “International Order, International Society and Globalisation.” In World Politics, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833804-15.

Idayanti, Soesi, Suci Hartati, and Toni Haryadi. “PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM BISNIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF PANCASILA PADA ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 9, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23917/jjr.v9i1.8091.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi, 13th Ed. Prenadamedia. Vol. 151, 2017.

Nursamsi, Dedy. “Kerangka Cita Hukum (Recht Idee) Bangsa Sebagai Dasar Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang Undang (Perppu).” JURNAL CITA HUKUM 2, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i1.1452.

Permatasari, Yuanita, and , Pranoto. “KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN DALAM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Privat Law 5, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v5i2.19384.

Pramesti, Ni Gusti Ni Gusti Nyoman Shanti. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Internasional Bagi Perusahaan Multinasional.” Journal Ilmu Hukum 01, no. 05 (2013).

Pranita, Ni Kadek Puspa, and I Wayan Suardana. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Pengguna Layanan Fintech (Financial Technology).” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 7, no. 2 (2019).

Putri, Resha Roshana, An-An Chandrawulan, and Prita Amalia. “PERINGKAT ARUS INVESTASI INDONESIA DALAM KERANGKA ASEAN-CHINA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (PERBANDINGAN DENGAN SINGAPURA, MALAYSIA, THAILAND, DAN VIETNAM) DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no2.1664.

Santoso, Ellen Valentina. “Keabsahan Putusan Arbitrase Online Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum: HUKUM UNTUK MENGATUR DAN MELINDUNGI MASYARAKAT 6, no. Putusan Arbitrase Online (2020).

Sengpunya, Phet. “Online Dispute Resolution Scheme for E-Commerce: The ASEAN Perspectives.” Pécs Journal of International and European Law 5, no. 2 (2020).

Situmorang, Mosgan. “Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.573-586.

———. “The Power of Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle in Arbitration Agreement.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.v21.447-458.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Madmuji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009.

Teitelbaum, R. “The Leading Arbitrators Guide to International Arbitration.” ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL 25, no. 1 (2009).

Vikarin, Keke Audia, and ’ Pujiyono. “EKSISTENSI ARBITRASE ONLINE SEBAGAI MODEL PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA E-COMMERCE DI BEBERAPA NEGARA.” Jurnal Privat Law 8, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v8i1.40376.