Legal Uncertainty Regarding Abuse of Authority That is Harming State Finance in Indonesia

Judith Sukmaningtyas(1), Nabitatus Sa’adah(2),


(1) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro
(2) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Abstract

This study aims to discuss issues regarding the legal certainty of criminal acts of abuse of authority and problems regarding the return of state financial losses in handling corruption cases in Indonesia. To examine these problems, a normative juridical research method was used using secondary legal data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the handling of cases of Corruption Crimes cannot be separated from the influences of the bureaucracy and political factors, both from the legal provisions that govern it and from unscrupulous government officials with strategic positions in the Government who are perpetrators of abuse of authority that is detrimental to finances. country. However, there is a discrepancy in the regulation regarding abuse of authority in the Law on government administration and the Law on criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, especially in terms of recovering state financial losses.

Keywords

Abuse of Authority; Corruption; Loss of State Finance.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahkam Jayadi. 2015. Memahami Tujuan Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun. 2012. “Pemuliaan (Breeding) Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Perjanjian Leasing Di Indonesia.” Yustisia 1(2): 47–62.

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. 2020. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7(1): 20–33.

Depri Liber Sonata. 2014. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum.” Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8(1): 15–35.

KPK. 2021. “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Tahun 2018-2021.” Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/109-statistik (June 2, 2021).

Lawrence M. Friedman. 2011. American Law An Introduction (Second Edition). Jakarta: PT. Tatanusa.

M. Aris Purnomo, Eko Soponyono. 2015. “Rekonseptualisasi Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Polri Dalam Rangka Efektifitas Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Law Reform 11(2): 230–240.

Mustaghfirin, H. 2011. “Sistem Hukum Barat, Sistem Hukum Adat, Dan Sistem Hukum Islam Menuju Sebagai Sistem Hukum Nasional Sebuah Ide Yang Harmoni.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11(1): 89–96.

Satjipto Rahardjo. 2014. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Satria, Hariman. 2018. “Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Media Hukum.

Seno Wibowo Gumbira, Adi Sulistiyono, Soehartono Soehartono. 2020. “Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Outside the Court According to Law Number 14 of 2001 on Patent.” Hang Tuah Law Journal 4(2): 101–117.

Simamora, Janpatar. 2014. “Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 194.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14(3): 547–561.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Judith Sukmaningtyas, Nabitatus Sa’adah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Private and Commercial Law

P-ISSN: 2599-0314  E-ISSN: 2599-0306

Department of Private and Commercial Law 

Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

K3 Building, 1st Floor

Sekaran Campus, Gunungpati, Semarang, Central Java 50229

Telp/Fax: (024) 8507891
Email: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.