STEM Teachers’ Professional Development through Scientist-Teacher-Students Partnership (STSP)

R. M. Saat, H. M. Fadzil, D. S. H. Adli, K. Awang

Abstract

Teachers are one of the most fundamental sources for the latest scientific information. However, many feel that teachers lack sufficient knowledge and skills to play this role, particularly in STEM, as STEM is related to more than one discipline. This study explores Scientist-Teacher-Students’ Partnership (STSP) as a professional development programme to enhance teachers’ understanding and conceptualization of the cutting-edge STEM knowledge and real-life applications of the STEM concepts. This study employed a qualitative research methodology, and it involved nine science teachers from four secondary schools and ten scientists from a university situated in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Data were collected through observations made during activities and interviews. The collected data were analyzed using constant comparative data analysis techniques. Overall, the findings suggested that the tripartite collaboration brings educational benefits to all groups. From the perspective of teachers’ professional development, it was found that the partnership: (i) enhanced the teachers’ understanding of cutting-edge STEM knowledge; (ii) elevated their confidence and enthusiasm in STEM; and (iii) provide opportunities for information exchange and support through school-university networking. This study had promoted a more significant articulation of STSP as a mechanism for professional development in STEM education.

Keywords

STEM; partnership; professional development

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aldahmash, A. H., Alshamrani, S. M., Alshaya, F. S., & Alsarrani, N. A. (2019). Research trends in in-service science teacher professional development from 2012 to 2016. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 163-178.

Barr, S., & Askell-Williams, H. (2020). Changes in teachers’ epistemic cognition about self–regulated learning as they engaged in a researcher-facilitated professional learning community. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 187–212.

Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-15.

Brawley, S. H., Pusey, J., Cole, B. J., Gott, L. E., & Norton, S. A. (2008). A revolutionary model to improve science education, teachers, and scientists. Maine Policy Review, 17(1), 68-80.

Chandran, K. B., Jarrett, K., & Wyss, J. M. (2020). Creating a sustainable partnership between a science center, university, and local school districts: A retrospective on over 20 years of successful programming and partnership. Journal of STEM Outreach, 3(3), 1-15.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Didden, C., & Edmunds, P. J. (2016). Experiential ecological investigations as a vehicle coupling teaching & research in high schools & universities. American Biology Teacher, 78, 278–284.

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Song, X., Fu, Q., Chai, C. S., & Huang, Y. (2019). Exploring the effects of contextual factors on in-service teachers’ engagement in STEM teaching. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 25-34.

Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2017). Exploring students acquisition of manipulative skills during science practical work. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4591-4607.

Fadzil, H. M., Saat, R. M., Awang, K., & Hasan Adli, D. S. (2019). Students’ perception of learning STEM related subjects through Scientist-Teacher-Student Partnership (STSP). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4), 537-548.

Falloon, G. (2013). Forging school–scientist partnerships: A case of easier said than done?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 858-876.

Farah, Y. N. (2019). Collaborative partnership: opening doors between schools and universities. Gifted Child Today, 42(2), 74–80.

Gallant, D. J. (2010). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Ohio State University.

Geng, J., Jong, M.S.Y. & Chai, C.S. (2019). Hong Kong teachers’ self-efficacy and concerns about STEM education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 35-45.

Johnson, O. (2017). A shift in scientific identities: How teacher-scientist partnerships can impact middle school teachers’ science teaching and instruction. North Carolina: The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation.

Komoroske, L. M., Hameed, S. O., Szoboszlai, A. I., Newsom, A.J. & Williams, S.L. (2015). A scientist’s guide to achieving broader impacts through K–12 STEM collaboration. BioScience, 65, 313.

Liu, S., & Phelps, G. (2019). Does teacher learning last? Understanding how much teachers retain their knowledge after professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 1-14.

Mahmud, S. N. D., Nasri, N. M., Samsudin, M. A. & Halim, L. (2018). Science teacher education in Malaysia: challenges and way forward. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4, Article 8.

Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ views and stereotypes of religion, scientists and scientific research: A call for scientist–science teacher partnerships to promote inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1767-1794.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: a guide to design and interpretation. Jossey-Bass.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Said, M. N. H. M. (2016). A meta-analysis of effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225-4228.

OECD (2009). Teaching and learning international study (TALIS). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Petersen, J., & Chan, P. (2020). A college–high school collaboration to support authentic microbiology research. The American Biology Teacher, 82(4), 201-208.

Permanasari, A., Rubini, B., & Nugroho, O. (2021). STEM Education in Indonesia: Science Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(1), 7-16.

Ramli, N. F., & Talib, O. (2017). Can education institution implement STEM? From Malaysian teachers’ view. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 721–732.

Reston, E., Krishnan, S., & Idris, N. (2014). Statistics education research in Malaysia and the Philippines: A comparative analysis. Statistics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 218-231.

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-21.

Rutkowski, D., Rutkowski, L., Bélanger, J., Knoll, S., Weatherby, K., & Prusinski, E. (2013). Teaching and Learning International Survey TALIS 2013: Conceptual Framework. Final. OECD Publishing.

Schaffhauser, D. (2016). OECD: Teacher professionalism needs improvement worldwide. The Journal.

Shein, P. P., & Tsai, C. Y. (2015) Impact of a Scientist–Teacher Collaborative Model on students, teachers, and scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2147-2169.

Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–20.

Sun, Y., Rogers, R. R., & Winship, J. M. (2019). An authentic and sustainable STEM pre-service teacher professional development model: authentic learning experience and preparing for tomorrow’s STEM professionals. In Handbook of Research on Educator Preparation and Professional Learning (pp. 321-339). IGI Global.

Taylor, A. R., Jones, M. G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists’ and teachers’ perceptions of science education. Science Education, 92(6), 1058-1075.

Tong, W., & Razniak, A. (2017). Building professional capital within a 21st century learning framework. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2(1), 36-49.

Toto, T., Yulisma, L., & Amam, A. (2021). Improving teachers’ understanding and readiness in implementing STEM through science learning simulation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 303-310.

So, W. M. W., He, Q., Chen, Y. & Chow, C. F. (2020). School-STEM professionals’ collaboration: A case study on teachers’ conceptions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(3), 300–3018.

Yerrick, R., & Beatty-Adler, D. (2011). Addressing equity and diversity with teachers though informal science institutions and teacher professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(3), 229-253.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.