Analysis of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Ability Based on Science Literacy for Pre-Service Primary School Teachers in Learning Science Concepts

F. Fakhriyah, S. Masfuah, F. S. Hilyana, N. Mamat

Abstract

This study intends to describe and investigate the ability profile of Technological Pedagogy Content Knowledge (TPACK) based on scientific literacy for pre-service primary school teachers. The measurement of student TPACK skills is needed to determine the knowledge of technology that will be implemented in the learning process. Students' TPACK knowledge needs to be developed because integration between pedagogical abilities, material content, and technology is needed. This research is quantitative survey research. This study tested a TPACK model, which was described by the relationship between latent variables, namely from seven components, including TK, PK, CK, TPK, TCK, PCK, and TPACK. The data collection technique used a questionnaire instrument with 46 items. The questionnaire instrument was filled out by 206 pre-service primary school teachers who had taken the Science Concept, Science Application, Science Teaching Learning Course, and Field Experience Practice Courses. The results were then calculated and analyzed using a modeling test with a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. The results showed that PCK variability could be influenced by the CK and PK components of 51.5%. While the variability of TCK can be influenced by the components of CK and TK of 42.7%. The variability of the TPK can be influenced by the PK and TK components of 45.2%. Finally, the magnitude of the effect of PK, CK, TK, PCK, TPK, and TCK components on TPACK is 61.0%. The TPACK profile of pre-service primary school teachers is good with the factors that contribute most to the components that go into PK and CK. As a result, the findings of this study will contribute to the development of a more thorough profile of the TPACK competencies of pre-service primary school teachers, which can enhance their capacity to incorporate technology when they become teachers in the future.

Keywords

science concepts; science literacy; TPACK

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ariani, D. N., Saad, N. S., Yusuf, Q., & Dalle, J. (2014). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Mathematics Teachers In Primary Schools.

Absari, N., Priyanto, P., & Muslikhin, M. (2020). The Effectiveness Of Technology, Pedagogy And Content Knowledge (TPACK) In Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 43–51.

Association, N. S. T. (2003). Standards For Science Teacher Preparation. Faculty Publications: Department Of Teaching, Learning And Teacher Education, 86.

Celik, I., Sahin, I., & Akturk, A. O. (2014). Analysis Of The Relations Among The Components Of Technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Structural Equation Model. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 51(1), 1–22.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A Review Of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C.-C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling Primary School Pre-Service Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) For Meaningful Learning With Information And Communication Technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184–1193.

Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK In Practice: Using An Elaborated Model Of The TPACK Framework To Analyze And Depict Teacher Knowledge. Techtrends, 53(5), 60–70.

Creswell, John W., And C. N. P. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The Robustness Of Test Statistics To Nonnormality And Specification Error In Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16.

Desstya, A. (2018). Validitas Reliabilitas Instrument Technologycal Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru Sekolah Dasar Muatan Pelajaran IPA. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Basic Of Education, 03(01), 126–139.

Deviana, T., & Aini, D. F. N. (2022). Learning Progression Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Pengembangan Konten Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 1285–1296.

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., & Mardapi, D. (2019). Developing Scientific Literacy-Based Teaching Materials To Improve Students’ Computational Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 482–491.

Fakhriyah, Fina, Masfuah, S., & Roysa, M. (2018). Readability Of Conceptual Science Material Teaching Based On Science Literacy Using Modified Cloze Test Technique To Develop Computational Thinking Skills. 262(Ictte), 165–169.

Fariyani, Q., Mubarok, F. K., Masfu’ah, S., & Syukur, F. (2020). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Of Pre-Service Physics Teachers. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 99–107.

Gao, P., Tan, S. C., Wang, L., Wong, A. F. L., & Choy, D. (2011). Self Reflection And Preservice Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Knowledge: Promoting Earlier Adoption Of Student-Centred Pedagogies. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 27(6).

Ghazali, N., & Nordin, M. S. (2019). Measuring Meaningful Learning Experience: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. International Journal Of Innovation, Creativity And Change, 9(12), 283–296.

Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced Issues In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Sage Publications.

Heflebower, M. (2012). Teaching & Assessing 21 St Century Skills. The Classroom Strategies Series. Amerika Serikat.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion For Assessing Discriminant Validity In Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

Holland, D. D., & Piper, R. T. (2016). A Technology Integration Education (TIE) Model For Millennial Preservice Teachers: Exploring The Canonical Correlation Relationships Among Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioral Controls, Motivation, And Technological, Pedagogical, And Content. Journal Of Research On Technology In Education, 48(3), 212–226.

Irmita, L., & Atun, S. (2018). The Influence Of Technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK) Approach On Science Literacy And Social Skills. Journal Of Turkish Science Education, 15(3), 27–40.

Irwanto, I. (2021). Research Trends In Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Literature Review From 2010 To 2021. European Journal Of Educational Research, 10(4), 2045–2054.

Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How Do We Measure TPACK? Let Me Count The Ways. Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, And Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook On Frameworks And Approaches, 16–31.

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues In Technology And Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Lynn, P. (2019). The Advantage And Disadvantage Of Implicitly Stratified Sampling. Methods, Data, Analyses: A Journal For Quantitative Methods And Survey Methodology (Mda), 13(2), 253–266.

Maeng, J. L., Mulvey, B. K., Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2013). Pre-service Teachers' TPACK: Using Technology To Support Inquiry Instruction. Journal Of Science Education And Technology, 22(6), 838–857.

Maknun, D. (2014). The Application Of Contextual Learning To Improve Scientific Literacy And Argumentation Quality Of Daarul Uluum PUI Majalengka Islamic Boarding School Students In Social Science Discussions. Journal Of Tarbiyah, 21(1), 119–148.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework For Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The Seven Trans-Disciplinary Habits Of Mind: Extending The TPACK Framework Towards 21st Century Learning. Educational Technology, 22–28.

Mourlam, D. J., Chesnut, S. R., & Bleecker, H. (2021). Exploring Preservice Teacher Self-Reported And Enacted TPACK After Participating In A Learning Activity Types Short Course. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 37(3), 152–168.

Papp, K. K., Huang, G. C., Lauzon Clabo, L. M., Delva, D., Fischer, M., Konopasek, L., Schwartzstein, R. M., & Gusic, M. (2014). Milestones Of Critical Thinking: A Developmental Model For Medicine And Nursing. Academic Medicine, 89(5), 715–720.

Prudon, P. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis As A Tool In Research Using Questionnaires: A Critique. Comprehensive Psychology, 4, 03-CP.

Puspitarini, E. W., Sunaryo, S., & Suryani, E. (2013, November). Pemodelan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) BerbasisTeknologiInformasidanKomunikasi (TIK) denganPendekatan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional ManajemenTeknologi XVIII Program Studi MMT-ITS (Surabaya, 27 Juli 2013).

Rahayu, A. H. (2022). Analisis Tpack Mahasiswa Pgsd Unsap Sumedang. COLLASE (Creative Of Learning Students Elementary Education), 5(1), 30–38.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Boenningstedt: Smartpls Gmbh, 584.

Rukmana, D., & Handayani, S. L. (2020). Contribution Of Earth And Space Science Online Course To Development Of TPACK For Prospective Science Teachers In Primary Education. International Conference On Learning And Advanced Education (ICOLAE2020), 145–158.

Sahin, I., Celik, I., Oguz Akturk, A., & Aydin, M. (2013). Analysis Of Relationships Between Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge And Educational Internet Use. Journal Of Digital Learning In Teacher Education, 29(4), 110–117.

Salas-Rueda, R.-A. (2020). TPACK: Technological, Pedagogical, And Content Model Necessary To Improve The Educational Process On Mathematics Through A Web Application? International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–13.

Sheffield, R., Dobozy, E., Gibson, D., Mullaney, J., & Campbell, C. (2015). Teacher Education Students Using TPACK In Science: A Case Study. Educational Media International, 52(3), 227–238.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge And Teaching : Foundations Of The New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning About Problem Based Learning: Student Teachers Integrating Technology, Pedagogy, And Content Knowledge. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101–116.

Sojanah, J., Suwatno, S., Kodri, K., & Machmud, A. (2021). Factors Affecting Teachers’technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (A Survey On Economics Teacher Knowledge). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 1–16.

Spasova, D. (2022). Generation Alpha And The Education. Technics. Technologies. Education. Safety, 1(June), 65–68.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D.

Sukarmin, S., & Sin, I. (2022). The Influence Of Principal Instructional Leadership Behaviour On The Organisational Commitment Of Junior High School Teachers In Surakarta. Malaysian Journal Of Learning And Instruction, 19(2), 69–95.

Suryawati, E., L.N, F., & Hernandez, Y. (2014). Analisis Keterampilan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) Guru Biologi Sma Negeri Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Biogenesis, 11(1), 67–72.

Tanak, A. (2020). Designing TPACK-Based Course For Preparing Student Teachers To Teach Science With Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Kasetsart Journal Of Social Sciences, 41(1), 53–59.

Tawafak, R., Alfarsi, G., Jabbar, J., Malik, S. I., Mathew, R., Alsidiri, A., Shakir, M., & Romli, A. (2021). Impact Of Technologies During COVID-19 Pandemic For Improving Behavior Intention To Use E-Learning.

Utami, I. S., & Guntara, Y. (2021, December). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN SELF ASSESSMENT TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (TPACK) CALON GURU FISIKA: APLIKASI STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING (SEM). In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Tahun 2021 (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Yulisman, H., Widodo, A., Riandi, R., & Nurina, C. I. E. (2019). Moderated effect of teachers’ attitudes to the contribution of technology competencies on TPACK. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 185–196.

Zhang, W., & Tang, J. (2021). Teachers’ TPACK development: A review of literature. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(7), 367–380.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.