A. Albaiti, L. Liliasari, O. Sumarna


N-hexane and methanol systen is one example of a binary system that shows the solubility properties of reciprocity. This study aimed to assess the mental model of a n-hexane-methanolbinary system. Interaction at the submicroscopic level between n-hexane and methanol molecules is described in the form of mental model. Penelitian ini menggunakan cloud point method untuk memperoleh data kesetimbangan cair-cair sistem n-heksana-metanol. This study used a cloud point method to obtain data on liquid-liquid equilibrium on the system of n-hexane-methanol. Research data showed the maximum critical temperature (above the consolute temperature) of this system was at 42.95 °C with Xmethanol = 0.475 (P= 715 mmHg). Data from the laboratory observations was representedas a symbolic level in the form of the curve of correlation between mole fraction of methanol with temperature in a phase diagram system of n-hexane-methanol. The curve that was formed was asymmetric. It indicated that the solubility of n-hexane in methanol was relatively small compared to the solubility of methanol in n-hexane. Mental model of the binary system of n-hexane-methanol in four curve areasin the form of visualization of the interaction between n-hexane and methanol molecules through London force. In thermodynamics, each component had the same chemical potential inboth phases at equilibrium state. This study results could have a contribution to form a mental model on the student as the prospective chemistry subject teachers.


n-hexane-methanol system; mental model, macroscopic level; submicroscopic level; symbolic level.

Full Text:



Akaygun, S. & Jones, L. L. (2013). Words Or Pictures : A Comparison of Written and Pictorial Explanations of Physical and Chemical Equilibria. International Journal of Science Educations, 36(5), 783-807.

Alberty, R. A. & Daniels, F. (1981).Kimia Fisika. Edisi Ketujuh. Jilid 1.Jakarta : Erlangga.

Alessi, P., Fermeglia, M. & Kikic, E. (1989). Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium of Cyclohexane-n-Hexane-Methanol Mixtures: Effect of Water Content. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data,34(2), 236-240.

Azizoglu, N., Alkan, M. & Geban, O. (2006). Undergraduate Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Phase Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education,83(6), 947-953.

Bain K., Moon A., Mack M. R. and Towns M. H. (2014).A Review of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Thermodynamics at the University Level.Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 320–335.

Becker, N., Stanford, C., Towns, M. & Cole, R. (2015). Translating Across Macroscopic, and Symbolic Levels : The Role of Instructor Facilitation in an Inquiry-Oriented Physical Chemistry Class. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 769-785.

Chittleborough, G. D. (2004). The Role of Teaching Models and Chemical Representation in Developing Studdents’ Mental Models of Chemical Phenomena. Disertasi. Perth :Curtin University of Technology.

Coll, R, K. (2009). Do Gifted Students View and Use Mental Models Differently from Others?. Educacion Quimica, 1(1), 18-31.

Conpolat, N., Pinarbasi, T., & Sozbilir, M. (2006). Prospective Teachers’ Misconceptions of Vaporization and Vapour Pressure. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(8), 1237-1242.

Dai, M., & Chao, J. P. (1985). Heats of Mixing of Partially Miscible Liquid System Cyclohexane + Methanol. Fluid Phase Equilibria,23(1), 315-319.

Fessenden, R. J. & Fessenden, J. S. (1986).Kimia Organik. Edisi ketiga, Jilid 1.Jakarta : Erlangga.

Gopal, H., Kleinsmidt, J., Case, J. & Musonge, P. (2004). An Investigation of Chemical Engineering Students’ Understanding of Phase Change. International Journal of Science Education. 26(13), 1597-1620.

Hernandez, G. E, Criswell, B. A., Kirk, N. J., Sauder, D. G. & Rushton, G. T. (2014). Pushing for Particulate Level Models of Adiabatic and Isothermal Processes in Upper-Level Chemistry Courses : A Qualitative Study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,15(1), 354-365.

Jansoon, N., Coll, R. K., & Somsook, E. (2009). Understanding Mental Models of Dilution in Thai Students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education,4(2), 147-168.

Nyachwaya, J. M., & Wood, N. B. (2014). Evaluation of Chemical Representations in Physical Chemistry Textbooks. Chemistry Educatio Research and Practice,15(1), 720-728.

Sendur, G. (2014). Are Creative Comparisons Developed by Prospective Chemistry Teachers Evidence of Their Conceptual Understanding? The Case of Inter- and Intramolecular Forces. Chemistry Education Research an Practice, 15(1), 689-719.

Sreenivasulu, B. & Subramaniam, R. (2013). University Students’ Understanding of Chemical Thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education,35(4), 601-635.

Tumay, H. (2014). Prospective Chemistry Teachers’ Mental Models of Vapor Pressure. Chemical Education Research and Practice,15(1), 366-379.

Wang, C.Y., & Barrow, L.H. (2010). Characteristics and Levels of Sophistication : An Analysis of Chemistry Students’ Ability to Think with Mental Models. Research Science Education, 41(1),561-586.

Wang, C. Y. & Barrow, L. H. (2013). Exploring Conceptual Frameworks of Models of Atomic Structures and Periodic Variations, Chemical Bonding, and Molecular Shape and Polarity : A Comparison of Undergraduate General Chemistry Students with High and Low Levels of Content Knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,14(1), 130-146.


  • There are currently no refbacks.