M. I. S. Putra, W. Widodo, B. Jatmiko


This study aimed to produce valid, practical and effective guided inquiry model science learning materials to enhance science literacy skill of prospective MI teachers. The tryout of the materials was implementedto students of MI teacher educationof Unipdu Jombang at academic year of 2015/2016 semesters 3 using One Group Pretest Posttest Design. The data collections were done using observation, testing, and questionnaires. Data were analysed using descriptive analysis of quantitative, qualitative and non-parametric statistical tests. The findings of the research were: 1) the learning materials were valid; 2) Practicality of the materials was tested through the implementation of lesson plans, while the learners’ activity wereappropriate to the guided inquirymodel; and 3) The effectiveness of the learning materials in terms of improvement of learning outcomes of students was seen from the n-gain with high category and increasing mastery of science literacy skills of learners also scored n-gain with high category and the response of students to the device and the implementation of learning is very positive. It was concluded that the materials were valid, practical, and effective to enhance science literacy skills of prospective MI teachers.


guided inquiry model, prospective MI teachers, science literacy, science learning materials.

Full Text:



Acevedo, N. A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Representational Flexibility in Linear Function Problems: A Choice/No-Choice study. In L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, T. de Jong and J. Elen (Eds.) Use or Representations in Reasoning and Problem Solving: Analysis And Improvement. Milton park, UK: Routledge, 74-93.

Akengin, H & Sirin, A. (2013). A Comparative study upon determination of scientific literacy level of teacher candidates.Academic journals, Vol. 8(19), 1882-1886.

Alberta, Learning. (2004). Focus on Inquiry: a teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry based learning. Edmonton, AB: Alberta education.

Ambarsari, Wiwin. (2012). Penerapan pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan proses sains dasar pad apelajaran biologi siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Univeristas Sebelas Maret.

Ariesta, R. &Supartono. (2011). Pengembangan perangkat perkuliahan kegiatan laboratorium Fisika dasar II berbasis inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan kerja Ilmiah mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia (JPFI) Universitas Negeri Semarang. No. I Vol. 7 Halaman 62-68.

Ashiq, H. A., Muhammad, A.& Azra, S. (2011). Physiscs Teaching Methods: Scientific Inquiry Vs Traditional Lecture. International Journal of Hummanities and Social Science. Vol 1 No. 19; December 2011.

Bao, L., Fang, K.&Cai, T. (2009). Learning of Content knowledge and development of scientific reasoning ability: A cross culture comparison. American Journal of Physics. 77 (12), 1118-1123.

Belland, B.R., Walker, A., Olsen, W.&Leary, H. (2012). Impact of scaffolding characteristic and study quality on learner outcomes in STEM Education: a Meta-Analysis. Paper Presented at the (2012) AERA Annual Convention, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B.&Lundberg, B. K. S. (2003). Benefiting from an Open–Ended Experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open inquiry version of the same experiment.International Journal of Science Education, 25(3).

Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Amstrong, N.& Hallar, B. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence.International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3:2.

Crawford, B. A., (2000). Embracing the essence of Inquiry: New Roles for science teachers.Journal of research in science teaching, 37 (9), 916-937.

Crockett, M.D. (2002) Inquiry as Professional Development: Creating Dilemmas through Teachers work. Teaching and teacher education, 18, 609-624.

David, M. H. (2006). Instructor’s Guide To Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. SUNY: Stony Brook University.

Eggen, P.D. & Kauchak, D.P. (2013).Educational psychology: Windows on clasrooms (9th edition). New Jersey: Pearson.

Fellenz, M. R. (2004). Using Assesment to Support Higher Level Learning: The Multiple Choice Item Development Assignment.Assesment and Education In Higher Education, 29(6), 703-719.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun H. H.( 2012).How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education, 8th Edition. New York : McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc

Genc, Murrat. (2015). The Effect of Scientific Studies on Students’ Scientific

Literacy and Attitude. OMU Journal Fac. Educ. 2015, 34(1), 141-152.

Gerald, F. L. (2011). The Twin Purposes of guided inquiry: guiding Student inquiy and evidence based practice. Scan. Vol 30 no 1 pp. 26-41.

Gormally, C., Brickman, P. & Lutz, M. (2012).Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments.Life Sciences Education, 11, 364–377.

Grant, H. (2011). The student experience intraditional and inquiry based chemstry labs. (PDF). Retrieved April 30, (2012) from Montana State University Library.

Hamza, A. & Ahmet, S. (2013). A Comparative study upon determination of scientific literacy level of teacher candidates.Academic journals. Educational Research and Riviews, 8:19, 1882-1886.

Heron, P. R. L.&Meltzer, D. E. Guest Editorial. (2005). Future of Physics education Research: Intellectual Challenges and practical concerns. American Journal of Physics. 73 (5) 390-394.

Holbrook, J.; Rannikmäe, M. (2009).The Meaning of Scientific Literacy.International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3),275 - 288

Holubova, R. (2013). Innovations in physics´ teacher education – how to educate GEN Y teachers.Proceeding International Conference on Physics Education, August 5-9, 2013, Prague, Czech Republic. Pp. 459-465.

Impey, C. (2013). Science literacy of undergraduates in the united states. Orgazations People and Strategies in Astronomy 2 (OPSA 2).Departement of Astronomy, University of Arizona.

Jan, H., Van, D.,Douwe, B.&Nico, V. (2001) Professionaldevelopment and reform in science education: the rule of teachers practical knowledge, Journal of research in science teaching. 38(2): 137-158.

Jurecki, K. &Wander, M. C.V. (2012). Science Literacy, Critical Thinking, And Scientific Literature: Guidelines For Evaluating Scientific Literature In The Classroom. Journal Of Geoscience Education, 60, 100–105.

Kautz, C. H., Heron, P.R.L., Loverude, M.E.&McDermott, L.C. (2005). Student understanding of the ideal gas law, Part I: a macroscopic perspective. American Journal Physics. 73(11) 1055-1063.

Khan, M.S., Hussain, S., Ali, R., Majoka, M.I.& Ramzan, M. (2011). Effect of inquiry method on achievement of students in chemistry at secondary level.International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1): 955-959

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J.&Clark, R.E., (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of The Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem Based, Experiential, And Inquiry Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), 75-86.

Kuhlthau, C.C. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21th Century. USA: Center for International Sholarship in School Libraries (CISSL).

Kuhlthau, C.C. (2010). Guided Inquiry.School Libraries Worldwide.Vol 16 No 1 January (2010) pp.17-28.

Kuhlthau, C.C.&Todd, R.J. (2008).Guided Inquiry.(Online).Tersedia 5 Januari 2016.

Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K.&Caspari, A.K. (2012).Guided Inquiry Design. Libraries Unlimited: Imprint ABC.

Lederman, N.G., Lederman, J.S.&Antink, L. (2013) Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy.International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1:3, 138-147.

Lee, H., Linn, M., Varma, K.&Liu, O. (2010) How to technology-enhanced inquiry science unit impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching.47, 71-90.

Lu, L & Ortlieb, E.T. (2009) Teacher candidate as innovative change agents. Current issues in education, 11(5).

Luft, J. (2001). Changing Inquiry Practices and beliefs: the impact of an inquiry-based professional development program on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers.International Journal Of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.

Madden, K.(2011). The Use Of Inquiry-Based Instruction To Increase Motivation And Academic Success In A High School Biology Classroom. (PDF). Retrieved April 30, (2012) from Montana State University Library.

McDermott, L.C. (2004). Physics by Inquiry (online). Tersedia: htpp://

McDermott, L.C., Heron, P.R.L., Shaffer, P.S.& Stetzer, M.P. (2006). Improving The preparation of K-12 Teachers Through Physics education research. American Journal of Physics. 74 (9) 763-767.

Mercer, N., Dawes, L.&Wegerif, R., (2004) Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science.British Educational Research Journal. 30(3), 359-377

Minner, D., Levy, A.&Century, J. (2010). Inquiry Based Science Instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a Research synthesis year 1984 to 2002. Journal of Reseacrh in Science Teaching, 47, 474-496.

Murcia, K. (2009). Re-thinking the development of scientific literacy through a rope metaphor.Research Science Education, 39, 215–229.

NRC (2011).Inquiri and the national science education standards.a guide for teaching and learning. Washington: National Academy Press.

Odegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S. & Sorvik, G.O. (2015).Budding science and literacy.A classroom video study of the challenges and support in an integrated inquiry and literacy teaching model.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 274–278.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (Volume V), PISA. Publishing: OECD.

Opara, J.A.&Oguzor, N.S. (2011). Inquiry Instructional Method and the school science curriculum.Current Research Journal of Social Sciences.Vol 3 No.3 Summer (2011). Pp. 188-198.

Pandey, G. K. Nanda&Ranjan, V. (2011).Effectiveness of inquiry training model over conventional teaching method on academic achievement of science student in India.Journal of Innovative Research in Education.1 (1), March, (2011). (pp.7-20).

Rust, P. (2011).The effect of Inquiry Instruction on Problem Solving and Conceptual Knowledge in a 9th Grade Physics Class.(PDF). Retrieved April 30, (2012) from Montana State University Library.

Sadeh, I.& Zion, M. (2009). The Development Of Dynamic Inquiry Performance Within An Open Inquiry Setting: A Comparison To Guided Inquiry Setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 46(10), 1137-1160.

Stricklyn, J. (2011). What effect will using inquiry methods of teaching science have on 6th grade students?.Montana State University Library.

Toeman, K. & Gucluer, E. (2012). The effect of using activities improving scientific literacy on students’ acchievement in science and techplogy lesson. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 1:1.

Toharuddin, U., Henrawati, S. &Rustaman, A. (2011).Membangun literasi peserta didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Turgut, H. (2005). The effect of constructivist design application on prospective science teachers' scientific literacy competence improvement at the dimensions of "nature of science "and" science-technology-society interaction". Unpublished Doctoral Disertation, Yıldız Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: Instanbul.

Turgut, H. (2007). Scientific literacy for all, Journal of Faculty of EducationalSciences, 40(2), 233-256.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A.M. & Osman, K. (2012).Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110 – 116.

Udompong, L. & Wongmanich, S. (2014). Diagnosis of the scientific literacy characteristics of primary students.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5091 – 5096.

Udompong, L., Traiwicitkhun, D. & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Causal model of research competency via scientific literacy of teacher and student. Procedia-Sosial and Behavioral Science, 116, 1581-1586

UNESCO.(2008). Science education policy-making eleven emerging issues. UNESCO

Wenning, C. J., (2005). Level of Inquiry: Hierarchies of Pedagogical Practices and Inquiry Processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education.No.3 Vol. 2.

Wenning, C. J., (2006). A framework for teaching the nature of science..Journal of Physics Teacher Education.3(3), March, pp.3-10.

Wenning, C. J., (2010). Using Inquiry Spectrum learning to teach science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Vol.5 No. 3 Summer pp. 11-17

Wenning, C. J., (2011). Experimental Inquiry in Introductory Physics Course.JPTEO (Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online) Illionis State University Physics Department. USA. No. 2 Vol. 6.

Widyaningtyas, A., Sukarmin & Radiyono, Y. (2013).Peran lingkungan belajar dan kesiapan belajar terhadap prestasi belajar fisika siswa kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Pati.Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1:1, 136-143.

Wilson, C.D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S.M.& Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry based and commonplace science teaching on students knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of research in science teaching, 47, 276-301.


  • There are currently no refbacks.