Analysis of Students’ Analytical Thinking Skill in Electromagnetic Induction Concept Using Mini Tesla Coil

Amalia Puspita Rengganis, Agus Yulianto

Abstract


This study discusses about the effect of using Mini Tesla Coil on students' analytical thinking skill in solving physics problems. This research aims to improve students’ analytical thinking skill and to classify students' analytical thinking skill level. The research used mix method with One Group pretest-posttest design. The respondents were 99 students consist of 34 students of 2nd semester, 34 students of 4th semester, and 31 students of 6th semester taken by purposive sampling technique. Demonstration and experiment with Mini Tesla coil were applied on this learning. Collecting data was done through tests and interviews. The significance difference of mean value of analytical thinking skill among student level is determined by ANAVA One Way test, while to know the improvement of analytical thinking skill using the normalized gain (N-Gain) test, and for clarification and deepening data of analytical thinking skill by interview. Based on ANAVA One Way test, Fcount = 5.61 > Ftable = 3.09. These results indicate that there are significant differences on analytical thinking skills among students. Based on the N-Gain test, value of N-Gain is 0.42 - 0.45 which indicates an enhancement on students' analytical thinking skills in the medium category. The result of interview classify the 2nd semester students tend to pre-analytical level, while students of 4th semester and 6th semester tend to partial analytical level. Thus the use of Mini Tesla Coil in the learning is effective to improve analytical thinking skills at all levels of students. Low-level students tend at the pre-analytical thinking whereas the higher level students tend at the partial analytical thinking


Keywords


Analytical Thinking, Teaching Props, Mini Tesla Coil

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aini, N. A. & Adhitama, E. (2015). Restrukturisasi Pendidikan Guru di Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan (LPTK) sebagai Strategi Mencetak Guru berkualitas Siap Asean Economic Community (AEC). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287890197. access on January 23, 2018.

Amer, A. (2005). Analytical Thinking: Pathways to Higher Education. Cairo: Cairo University Press.

Anas, M. (2014). Alat Peraga dan Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Pustaka Education.

Anderson, L. W. (2001). A Revision Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Anderson, L. W. (2015). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Terjemahan Agung Prihantoro. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Berk, R. A. (2009). Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtvU in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 5(1).

Churches, A. (2008). Bloom’s Taxonomy Blooms Digitaly. Technplogy & Learning, (1), 1-6.

Cano-Garcia, F. & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and Thinking Styles: An Analysis of Their Interrelationship and Influence on Academic Achievement. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430.

Dega, B. G., Kriek, J., & Mogese, T. F. (2013). Students’ Conceptual Change in Electricity and Magnetism Using Simulations: A Comparison of Cognitive Perturbation and Cognitive Conflict. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 50(6), 677-698.

Frederickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions: The emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it's good to feel good. American scientist, 91(4), 330-335. Winarti. (2015). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Analisis dan Evaluasi Mahasiswa dalam Mengerjakan Soal Konsep Kalor. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 19-24.

Hau, R.R. H, Marwoto, P., Putra, N. M. D., & Wiyanto, W. (2018). Deskripsi Kemampuan representasi Matematik dalam Pemecahan Masalah Fisika pada Perkuliahan Listrik Magnet. Physics Communication, 2(1), 1-17.

Hartati, B. (2010). Pengembangan Alat Peraga Gaya Gesek untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, (6), 128-132.

Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B. & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Technical Education Students”. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121-131.

Hilgard, E. R. & Bower, G. H. (1981). Theories of Learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: NJ Pretince Hall.

Ipek, H. & Calik, M. (2008). Combining Different Conceptual Change Methods within Four-Step Constructivist Teaching Model: A Simple Teaching of Series and Parallel Circuits. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(3): 143 – 153.

Kao, C. Y. (2014). Exploring The Relationship Between Analogical, Analytical and Creative Thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, (13), 80-88.

Kiong, T. T., Yunos, J. M., Hassan, R., Heong, Y. M., Hussein, A. H., & Mohamad, M.M. (2012). Thinking skills for secondary school students in Malaysia. Teacher Education, 2(2), 12-23.

Kutbiddinova, R. A., Eromasova, A. A., & Romanova, M. A. (2016). The Use of Interactive Methods in the Educational Process of the Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(14), 6557-6572.

Lorenz, M., & Elefteriadou, L. (2001). Defining freeway capacity as function of breakdown probability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1776), 43-51.

Muchsin & Khumaedi. 2017. Analisis Keterampilan Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Menjelaskan Konsep Menggunakan Analogi pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Physics Communication, 1(1), 23-33.

Montaku, S., Kaittikomol, P., & Tiranathanakul, P. (2012). The Model of Analytical Thinking Skill Training Process. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(1), 17-20.

Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Cognitive Development, Analytical Thinking, and Learning Satisfication of Second Grade Student Learned Through Inquiry-Based Learning. Asian Social Science, 5(10), 82-87.

Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of research in science teaching, 46(2), 147-165.

Reber, A. S. (2005). The Pinguins Dictionary of Psycholog (2nd ed).New York: Penguin Press

Rustaman, N. Y. (2011). Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sains dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi untuk Pembangunan Karakter. Prosiding Seminar Biologi, 8(1), 1-11.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Sumarli, Nugroho, S. E. & Yulianti, I. 2018. Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving Berpendekatan Inquiry terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. Physics Communication, 2(1), 63-69.

Suseno, N. (2010). Kendala Penerapan Inkuiri dalam Perku-liahan Listrik-Magnet di LPTK. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 15(2), 95-102.

Suseno, N. (2014). Pemetaan Analogi pada Konsep Abstrak Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 1-10.

Setyowati, N., Susilo, B.E., & Masrukan. (2016). Penggunaan Alat Peraga Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Keaktifan Siswa pada Materi Peluang. Kreano, 7(1), 24-30.

Uki, R. S., Saehana, S., & Pasaribu, M. 2017. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Berbasis Hands-on Activity pada Materi Fluida Dinamis terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Physics Communication, 1(2), 6-11.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v2i2.14966

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


View My Stats