Analisis kemampuan literasi sains dan metakogntif peserta didik

Dwi Sukowati, Ani Rusilowati, Sugianto Sugianto

Abstract


Government demands on the learning process always put their science lessons. The most important thing in learning science is the scientific literacy skills and high-level thinking skills are metacognitive. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the relationship between metacognitive abilities scientific literacy with students in some secondary schools are implementing Curriculum 2013. The method used is a sequential explanatory mixed method. Quantitative data analysis techniques using parametric statistical and qualitative data analysis using grounded theory. The results showed the average value of scientific literacy skills every school is less than 50, included in the poor category. In terms of distribution of score points ability of scientific literacy acquired under the target distribution points Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). That is, the state of learners in terms of literacy is still low, especially science. The average value of metacognitive skills of students in each school ranged from 64-75, including the high criteria. Learners are well aware of her capabilities and control the learning process from planning to evaluate themselves after solving the problem. Based on the calculation of product moment correlation, the relationship between scientific literacy and metacognitive learners are very weak with a value of r = 0.006. The students are not familiar with the question of scientific literacy, so that the value of scientific literacy is low in metacognitive learners high.

Keywords


Analysis, Scientific Literacy, Metacognitive

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, S. 2014. Problematika Kurikulum 2013 dan Kepemimpinan Intruksional Kepala Sekolah. Jurnal Pencerahan 8(2) hal. 1693-1775

Bybee, R.W., McCrae, B. & Laurie, R. 2009. PISA 2006. An Assesment of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (8) hal. 865-883.

Eggen, P. D. & Kauchak, 1996. Strategies for Teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Ehrlinger, J. 2014. Decision-Making and Cognitive Biases. Department of Psychology: Washington State University.

Federasi Serikat Guru Indonesia (FSGI). 2013. Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 Dipaksakan. http://www.fsgi.or.id/. Diunduh 15 agustus 2016.

Flavell, J. H. 2000. Development of childrens knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development 24 hal. 15-23.

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D., 1999. Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6) hal. 1121-1134.

Matlin, M. W., 2003. Cognitive Psychology. Wiley: United States of America.

Odegaard, M., Berit, H., Sonja ,M., & Gard, O. S. 2015. Budding Science and Literacy. A ClassroomVideo Study of the Challenges and Suport in an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Teaching Model. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 167 (674) hal. 274278.

Rusilowati, A. Kurniawati, L., Nugroho, S. E., & Widyatmoko, A., 2016. Developing an Instrument of Scientific Literacy Asessment on the Cycle Them. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 11(12) hal. 5718-5727.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v1i1.8961

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


View My Stats