The Implication of e-WoM Communication on Customer Preference and Purchase Decision of Electronic Gadgets

Budiono Hardjono, Sugeng A. Riyadi, Diba Aris

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implications of e-WoM components (intra-personal ties, homophile, credibility) on consumer purchasing decisions both directly and through mediating consumer preferences. Previous experience of consumer purchases conveyed by word of mouth can be a preference for other consumers in buying products or services. The development of digital communication makes electronic Word of Mouth (e-WoM) play an important role in influencing consumer preferences, especially for those who have to make purchasing decisions for products with many features such as gadgets. A total of 300 questionnaires were distributed around Jakarta using simple random sampling and obtained 102 complete responses from respondents. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical methods, correlational and multiple regression with the help of SPSS software. The results showed that the gadget purchase decision was partially influenced by consumer purchasing preferences and credibility sources, but this purchase preference was not as dominant as the credibility source. Gadgets are designed unusual and have many advanced technological features compared to conventional products, therefore the results of this study may not be valid for products outside of the gadget. Further research is needed whether e-WoM has the same influence on consumer purchasing decisions of conventional products.

Keywords

e-WoM, Customer Preference, Customer Purchase Decision Inter-Personal Ties, Homophily, Source of Credibility, Gadget.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buda., & Zhang. (2008). Consumer Product Evaluation: the Interactive Effect of Message Framing, Presentation Order, and Source Credibility. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(4), 229-242.

Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: a Literature Analysis and Integrative Model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470.

Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of Consumer Engagement in Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) in Social Networking Sites. International journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.

Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the Credibility of Online Celebrities’ Instagram Profiles in Influencing the Purchase Decisions of Young Female Users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(March), 1-25.

Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). ‘Instafamous’-Credibility and Self-Presentation of Micro-Celebrities on Social Media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432-1446.

Gfrerer, A., & Pokrywka, J. (2012). Traditional vs. Electronic Word-of-Mouth: a Study of WOM Communication and Its Influence on Young Consumers Within the Automobile Industry. Thesis. International Marketting and Brand Management. Lund University.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate themselves on the Internet?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.

Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2017). The Effects of Social Commerce Design on Consumer Purchase Decision-Making: an Empirical Study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 25(September-October), 40-58.

Ismagilova, E., Dwivedi, Y. K., Slade, E., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the Marketing Context: a State of the Art Analysis and Future Directions. Wales: Springer.

Jalilvand, M. R., Esfahani, S. S., & Samiei, N. (2011). Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Challenges and Opportunities. Procedia Computer Science, 3(October), 42-46.

Kiecker, P., & Cowles, D. (2002). Interpersonal Communication and Personal Influence on the Internet: a Framework for Examining Online Word-of-Mouth. Journal of Euromarketing, 11(2), 71-88.

Kim, S., Kandampully, J., & Bilgihan, A. (2018). The Influence of eWOM Communications: an Application of Online Social Network Framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 80(March), 243-254.

Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic Word-of-Mouth in Hospitality and Tourism Management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458-468.

Majláth, M. (2013). Who does Generate e-WOM and Why? a Research Proposal. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 10(6), 135-150.

Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationship Satisfaction as a Predictor of Similarity Ratings: a Test of the Attraction-Similarity Hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 561-584.

Okazaki, S., Andreu, L., & Campo, S. (2017). Knowledge Sharing among Tourists via Social Media: a Comparison between Facebook and TripAdvisor. International Journal of Tourism Research, 19(1), 107-119.

Oroh, W. L. (2014). The Influence of Consumers’tie Strength, Homophily and Source Credibility toward Electronic Word-of-Mouth (EWoM) Behavior. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 2(3).1214-1329.

Park, C., Wang, Y., Yao, Y., & Kang, Y. R. (2011). Factors Influencing Ewom Effects: Using Experience, Credibility, and Susceptibility. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(1), 74-79.

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847-855.

Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017). Uses and Gratifications of Social Networking Sites for Bridging and Bonding Social Capital: a Comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72(July), 115-122.

Saleem, A., & Ellahi, A. (2017). Influence of Electronic Word of Mouth on Purchase Intention of Fashion Products on Social Networking Websites. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11(2), 597-622.

Tien, D. H., Rivas, A. A. A., & Liao, Y. K. (2019). Examining the Influence of Customer-to-Customer Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Purchase Intention in Social Networking Sites. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(3), 238-249.

Valacich, J. S., Wang, X., & Jessup, L. M. (2018). Did I Buy the Wrong Gadget? How the Evaluability of Technology Features Influences Technology Feature Preferences and Subsequent Product Choice. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 42(2), 633-644.

Voicu, M. C. (2013). Characteristics of the Consumer Preferences Research Process. Econ Papers, Global Economic Observer, 1(1), 126-134.

Wang, J. J., Wang, L. Y., & Wang, M. M. (2018). Understanding the Effects of EWoM Social Ties on Purchase Intentions: a Moderated Mediation Investigation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 28(March-April), 54-62.

Wu, P. C., & Wang, Y. C. (2011). The Influences of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Message Appeal and Message Source Credibility on Brand Attitude. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 448-472.

Yayli, A., & Bayram, M. (2010). eWOM: The Effects of Online Consumer Reviews on Purchasing Decision of Electronic Goods. Proceedings. International Marketing Trends Conference Venice, 21-23 January 2010.

Zhu, D. H., Chang, Y. P., & Luo, J. J. (2016). Understanding the Influence of C2C Communication on Purchase Decision in Online Communities from a Perspective of Information Adoption Model. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 8-16.

View Counter: Abstract - 1645 and PDF - 1274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share