Lending Rationale of Financial Institution and Fintech on the Perception of Borrowers: A Qualitative Study
(1) Departemen Manajemen dan Bisnis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Padjadjaran
(2) Departemen Manajemen dan Bisnis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Padjadjaran
(3) Departemen Manajemen dan Bisnis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Padjadjaran
(4) Departemen Manajemen dan Bisnis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Padjadjaran
Abstract
The development of Financial Institutions including Financial Technology (Fintech) in providing loans to borrowers is increasingly important in the current business financing system. This study aims to determine the perceptions of borrowers by exploring their views on lending practices pro- vided by financial institutions and fintech and identifying the factors that influence the institution’s decision to provide loans to them. This study uses a qualitative research method by asking a number of questions to debtors in one of the Micro and Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) commu- nities in the city of Bandung, Indonesia. The questionnaire form is in the form of open-ended ques- tions and is distributed to 47 MSMEs in the city with various types of business fields. The results show that the factors that influence the success of borrowers in obtaining credit from both financial institutions and fintech are the factors classified as 5 Cs of credit in terms of Character, Capacity, Capital, Collateral, and Conditions. All these factors are summarized as soft information and hard information, which are applied by financial institutions and financial technology institutions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bellucci, A., Borisov, A., Giombini, G., Zazzaro, A. (2019). Collateralization and distance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100, 205–217.
Berger, A. N. and Udell, G. F. (1995). Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm Finance. The Journal of Business, 68 (3), 351-381.
Capon, N. (1982). Credit Scoring Systems: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 46 (2), 82-91.
Chen, D., Li, X., & Lai, F. (2016). Gender discrimination in online peer-to-peer credit lending: evidence from a lending platform in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(4): 553–583.
Cornée, S., Masclet, D., Thenet, G. (2012). Credit relationships: evidence from experiments with real bankers. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44 (5), 957-980.
Degryse, H., and Ongena, S. (2005). Distance, Lending Relationships, and Competition. The Journal of Finance, LX (1), 231-266.
Diamond, D.W. (1989). Reputation acquisition in debt markets. Journal of Political Economy, 97 (4), 828-862.
Ding, J.., Huang, J., Li, Y., Meng, M. (2019). Is there an effective reputation mechanism in peer-to-peer lending? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 30, 208-215.
Enimu, S., Eyo, E. O., and Ajah, E. A. (2017). Determinants of loan repayment among agricultural microcredit finance group members in Delta state, Nigeria. Financial Innovation, 3, 21. DOI 10.1186/s40854-017-0072-y.
Freedman, S., & Jin, G. Z. (2008). Do social networks solve information problems for peer-to-peer lending? Evidence from Prosper.com (NET Institute Working Paper No. 08-43). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1304138.
Grunert, J. and Norden, L. (2012). Bargaining power and information in SME lending. Small Bus Econ, 39, 401–417. DOI 10.1007/s11187-010-9311-6.
Han, J.T., Chen, Q., Liu, J.G., Luo, X.L., & Fan, W.G. (2018). The persuasion of borrowers’ voluntary information in peer to peer lending: an empirical study based on elaboration likelihood model. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 200–214.
Heffernan, S. (2009). Modern Banking. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Herzenstein, M., Andrews, R., & Dholakia, U. (2008) The democratization of personal consumer loans? Determinants of success in online peer-to-peer lending communities,Working Paper. Available at SSRN www.prosper.com.
Hillier, D., Ross, S., Westerfield, R., Jaffe, J., and Jordo, B. (2016). Corporate Finance, 3rd Edition, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
Howells, P., and Bain, K. (2008). The Economics of Money, Banking and Finance: A European Text. FT Prentice Hall, Pearson Education.
Indonesia Financial Authority (2019). https://www.ojk.go.id/. Accessed on 22 September 2020.
International Labor Organization (2021). Barrier for Access to Finance for MSMEs in North Macedonia. Stock of Existing data and Knowledge. International Labor Organization, June 2021. https://www.ilo.org/empent/units/boosting-employment-through-small-enterprise-development/eese/WCMS_804266/lang--en/index.htm. Accessed on 25 November 2021.
Jagtiani, J. & Lemieux, C. (2017). Fintech Lending: Financial Inclusion, Risk Pricing, and Alternative Information, Working Papers 17-17, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, revised 18 July 2017.
Jiangli, W., Unal, H., and Chiwon Yom, C. (2008). Relationship Lending, Accounting Disclosure, and Credit Availability during the Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40 (1), 25-55.
Macerinskiene, I., Ivaskeviciute, L. (2008). The Evaluation Model of a Commercial Bank Portfolio. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 4, 269-277.
Ministry of Cooperative, and Small, Medium Enterprises in Indonesia, 2019. http://www.depkop.go.id. Accessed on 22 September 2020.
Mishkin, F.S. (2016). The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets. Eleventh Edition. Pearson Education, Inc.
Okurut, F.N., Schoombee, A., & Berg, S.V.D. (2010). Credit demand and credit rationing in the informal financial sector in Uganda. South African Journal of Economics, 73 (3), 482-497.
Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance, 49, 3–37. doi:10.2307/2329133.
Prah, D. (2017). The lending process of Banks: A case study of Barclays Bank Ghana. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research, 3(9), 17-22.
Ravina, E. (2019). Love & Loans: The Effect of Beauty and Personal Characteristics in Credit Markets (February 15, 2019). Available at SSRN:
Roszbach, K. (2004). Bank Lending Policy, Credit Scoring, and the Survival of Loans. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86 (4), 946-958.
Saunders, A., and Cornett, M.M. (2012). Financial Markets and Institutions. Fifth Edition. McGraw Hill International Edition.
Sharma, P., and N. Gounder (2012). Obstacles to Bank Financing of Micro and Small Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from The Pacific with Some Policy Implications. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 19 (2), 49-70.
Sekaran, U., and Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, Seventh Edition. A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Publication.
Statistics Indonesia (2019). https://www.bps.go.id/. Accessed on 22 September 2020.
Turvey, C. G., He, G., Kong, R., Ma, J., and Meagher, P. (2011). The 7 Cs of rural credit in China. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 1 (2), 100 – 133.
Wasiuzzaman, S., Nurdin, N., Abdullah, A.H. and Vinayan, G. (2019). Creditworthiness and access to finance: a study of SMEs in the Malaysian manufacturing industry. Management Research Review, 43 (3), 293-310.
Xu, Y., Luo, C., Chen, D., & Zheng, H. (2015). What Influences the Market Outcome of Online P2P Lending Marketplace? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 23(3), 23–40.
Yang, Y. (2014). Does high-quality auditing decrease the use of collateral? Analysis from the perspective of lenders’ self-protection. China Journal of Accounting Research, 7, 203–221.
Zhang, Y.J., Li, H.F., Hai, M., Li, J.X., & Li, A.H. (2017). Determinants of loan funded successful in online P2P lending. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 896–901.
Zutter, C. J. and Smart, S. B. (2019). Principles of Managerial Finance, Fifteenth Edition. Pearson Global Edition.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
