Main Priorities in Value Added Improvement-Based on Commodity Processing System

Dyah Maya Nihayah(1), Amin Pujiati(2), Moh Khoiruddin(3),


(1) Economics Department, Economics Faculty, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Economics Department, Economics Faculty, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Management Department, Economics Faculty, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

The huge number of rambutan plants in Gunungpati has resulted in the decline of rambutan sales price during harvest season, i.e. Rp 1,500.00 per pack, any unsold rambutan tends to immediately wilt, break and deteriorate. This research is aimed to the sequence of commodity processing priority in order to increase the product’s value-added. This study is an action research, using descriptive statistic and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results indicate that a counseling since production until post-harvest becomes the highest priority, followed by produce sorting, and availability of produce processing technology. It is necessary to have practical field-based initiatives of businesses farmers who have managed to do the innovations, competitive advantage, and then to rise the competitiveness. To make this value-added-based horticulture commodity processing system work, Government role is required to guiding and evaluating every policy priorities.

Keywords

priority, processing, commodity, value added, AHP.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andrews, Julia. 2016. Value Adding to Agriculture In Central West NSW. Regional Development Australia Central West. http://www.rdacentralwest.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/FINAL-Value-Adding-to-Agriculture.pdf accessed on 13thFebruary 2017

Chandrakala. N, P. Kanchana Dev, 2016. A Study on Attitude of The Organic Farmers With Supply Chain Management on The Market for Their Commodities With Special Reference to Coimbatore District. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education (IJMRME).ISSN (Online): 2454 – 6119. Volume II, Issue II, 2016.

Hermanto & Dewa K.S. Swastika. 2011. Penguatan Kelompok Tani: Langkah Awal Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Petani. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. Volume 9 No.4 Desember 2011: 371-390. Puslitbang Sosek Pertanian, Balitbang Pertanian.

Kelly, Siobhan. 2012. Smallholder business models for agribusiness-led development. Food And Agriculture Organization of The United Nations. http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/md923e/md923e00.pdf accessed on 10 Agustus 2016

Lambert, David K., Siew Hoon Lim, Kathleen Tweeten, F. Larry Leistritz, William W. Wilson, Gregory J. McKee, William E. Nganje, Cheryl S. DeVuyst, & David M.Saxowsky. 2006. Agricultural Value Added: Prospects for North Dakota. Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics Agricultural Experiment Station. North Dakota State University

Lu, Ruoxi & Rebekka Dudensing. 2015. What Do We Mean by Value-added Agriculture?.4th Quarter 2015. 30(4). the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association. http://www.choicesmagazine.org/choices-magazine/submitted-articles/what-do-we-mean-by-value-added-agriculture accessed on 21 December 2016

Margunani, Etty Soesilowati & Dyah Maya Nihayah 2012, Pemetaan Potensi Ekonomi Tanaman Hortikultur Sebagai Komoditas Unggulan Di Gunungpati, Kota Semarang, Laporan Penelitian, UNNES, 2012.

Murwatiningsih. Dyah Maya Nihayah & Shanty Oktavilia.2013.Competitiveness of Leading Commodities to Support Developing Region of Agrotourism. Economics Journal and Emerging Market (EJEM). Vol 2 October 2013, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta

Mimovi, Predrag and Ana Krstic. 2016. The Integrated Application of The AHP and The DEA Methods in Evaluating The Performances of Higher Education Institution in The Republic of Serbia. Economic Horizons, January - April 2016, Volume 18, Number 1, 73 – 86

Nihayah, Dyah Maya, 2012, Strategi Pengembangan Agrobisnis Tanaman Buah Untuk Mendukung Percepatan Gunungpati Sebagai Kawasan Agrowisata di Kota Semarang, Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Call For Paper, ISBN 978-602-17035-0-5, Jurusan Ekonomi Pembangunan, UNNES.

OECD. 2015. Analysing Policies To Improve Agricultural Productivity Growth, Sustainably. http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/Analysing-policies-improve-agricultural-productivity-growth-sustainably-december-2014.pdf accessed on 23 September 2016.

Persson, Katarina. 2015. Adding value to gain competitive advantages Agricultural and horticultural firms’corporate strategies to create wealth. Department of Economics. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. http://stud.epsilon.slu.se/8532/1/Persson_K_151005.pdf Accessed on 20 September 2016.

Pujiati, A., Nihayah, D., & Setiyani, R. (2016). Rambutan Commodity Development Strategy as Regional Potential Product. JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan, 9(1), 50-61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v9i1.7186

Setiawan, Adi. Eko Sediyono. Dirk A. L. Moekoe. 2014. Application of AHP Method in Determining Priorities of Conversion of Unused land to Food Land in Minahasa Tenggara. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975-8887) Volume 89–No 8, March 2014

Watanabe, M., Jini, N., & Kurihara, M., 2009, Is the development of the agro-processing industry pro-poor ?: The case of Thailand, Journal of Asian Economics 20 (2009) pp: 443–455

Zaelani, Achmad. 2008. Manfaat Kemitraan Agribisnis Bagi Petani Mitra (Kasus: Kemitraan PT Pupuk Kujang dengan Kelompok Tani Sri Mandiri Desa Majalaya Kecamatan Majalaya Kabupaten Karawang, Provinsi Jawa Barat). http://repository.ipb.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/1441/A08aza1.pdf;jsessionid=8EDE5160B513E94F856CB6A088918A5E?sequence=5 accessed on 20 September 2016.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.