Willingness to Pay to Overcome Pollution in Tapak River, Semarang

Indah Susilowati(1), Hasmi Nurdinsyah Malik(2), A’yuni Choirunnisa(3), Farah Aisha Nur Afifah(4), Ulfatun Niswah(5),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v12i1.18392


(1) Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
(2) Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
(3) Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
(4) Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
(5) Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the level of Willingness to Pay of the community around TapakTugurejo Village, TuguSubdistrict, Semarang City in pollution prevention efforts on the Tapak River. This study offers a water purification model with the slow sands filtration method to improve water quality on the Tapak River. The analysis used was hypothetical market, Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), and multiple linear regression analysis to determine the Willingness to Pay relationship with other influencing factors, such as income, education, and age. Data was obtained from 30 respondents who were residents in RW04 TapakTugurejo Village, Semarang. Sample collection used in this study was the strategic random sample method. Hypothetical Market Value of respondents determines the willingness to pay for river pollution prevention efforts. The results found that the average cost of willingness to pay (WTP) of respondents for river pollution prevention activities from 30 respondents was Rp. 14,000.00. The total cost of WTP per year must be paid by the community from the loss of mangroves in the Tugurejo Village with a population of 6,941 people, was Rp 97,174,000.00.

Keywords

Slow Sand, Tapak Rive, WTP

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agus Sistyanto, Niko. (2011). Domestic Water Use and Willingness To Pay Clean Water PDAM in Temanggung Subdistrict, Temanggung Regency. Jakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.

Annisa, Tri Mulia and Rika Harini. (2014). Analysis Willingness to Pay for the Transfer of Sustainable Ecotourism in the Pindul Cave Tourism Area, Gunung Kidul Regency

Asdak, C. (2002). Hydrology and Management of Watersheds. Gajahmada University Press. Yogyakarta.

Bungin, Burhan. (2006). Quantitative Research Methodology: Communication, Economics, and Public Policy and Other Social Sciences. Jakarta: Kencana

Choe, K., D. Whittington and D. T. Lauria. (1996). The Economic Benefits of Surface Water Quality Improvements in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Davao, Philippines. Land Economics 72(4):519–37. Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling Techniques . 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley.

Effendi, H. (2003). Review of Water Quality. Kanisius Publisher. Yogyakarta.

Elfa M, Guty. (2009). Willingness To Pay Analysis of Society for Improving Service of Water Supply System with WSLIC (Water Sanitation for Low Income Community). Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Fauzi, Akhmad. (2010). Natural Resource Economics and the Environment: Characteristics and Applications. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis International Edition. 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Gujarati, Darmodar N.(2003). Basic Econometrics. Fourth Edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Ghozali, Imam. (2009). Econometrics, Theory, Concepts, and Applications with SPSS 17. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Government Regulation No. 82 2001. concerning Management of Water Quality and Water Pollution Control. Ministry of Environment. Jakarta.

Hanley, N. and C.L. Splash. (1993). Cost of Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Han, Fang., Yang, Zaophing., Wang, Hui & Xu, Xiaoling. (2011). Estimating Willingness to Pay for Environment Conservation : a Contingent Valuation Study of Kanas Nature Reserve, Xianjiang, China. Springer- Environ Monit Asses 180: 451-459.

Jatnika, Luthfan and Benno Rahardyan. (2015). Analysis Willingness To Pay Society Regarding Payment of Environmental Services for the Cirahab Springs (CurugGoong, Sub-district Padarincang, District Serang, Banten). 17(1):059–066

Karytsas, spyridon. Polyzou ,olympia. And Constantine karytsas. (2019). Factors affecting willingness to adoupt and willingness to pay for a residential hybrid system that provides heating/cooling and domestic hot water. Renewable energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.108

Tugurejo village. (2018). Profile of Tugurejo UrbanVillage. http://kectugu.semarang kota. go.id/ kelurahan-tugurejo.

Ladiyance, Selfia and Lia Yuliana. (2014). Application of Contingent Valuation Method in Efforts to Improve Cikapundung River Cleanliness in Bandung City. 2(2).

Losonci, Ildiko. (2012). Valuation of Ecosystem Services : The Case of Orseg National Park, Hungary. (Thesis Master of science, University of New Hampshire).http://search.proquest.com.

Manik, K. (2003). Management of The Environment. Djambatan Publisher. Jakarta.

Merryna, Annisa. (2009). Analysis Willingness To Pay for

HippamCangar User Against Gemulo Springs.

Mitcell, Robert C. and Ricard T Carson. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C: Resources for the Future.

Ningrum, Hardian Cahya. (2017). Variables that Affect Willingness To Pay in Bidaracina Society, East Jakarta. 25(2).

Nam, P. K, and T. V. H. Son. (2005). Household Demand for Improved Water Services in Ho Chi Minh City: A Comparison of Contingent Valuation and Choice Modelling Estimates. The Economy and Environment Program for South East Asia (EEPSEA). Singapore.

Nazir M. (2005). Research Method. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Pineda, F.P dan Armijo, C.Q. (2013). Estimating Willingness To Pay and Financial Feasibility in Small Water Projects in El Salvador. Journal of Business Research 66 1750–175

Raje, DV.,Dhobe, PS., Deshpande, AW. (2002). Consumer’s Willingness To Pay More for Municipal Supplied Water: A Case Study. Ecological Economics, 42.

Ramdas, Murugadas & Mohamed, Badaruddin. (2014). Impacts of Tourism on Environmental attributes, environmental literacy and willingness to pay : a Conceptual and Theoritical Review. Procedia- Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciencess, 144(1), 378391.

Salmin. (2005). Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Biological Oxygen Needs (BOD) As One Indicator To Determine Quality of Fisheries. Field of Ocean Dynamics Oceanographic Research Center-LIPI, Jakarta.

Saptutyningsih, Endah. (2007). Influential Factors Against Willingness to Pay for Improving the Quality of the Waters of the Code River in the City of Yogyakarta. 8(2):17

Saptutyningsih, Endah. Selviana, Rini. (2017). Valuing Ecotourism of a Recreational Site in Ciamis District 0f West Java, Indonesia. Jejak 10(1):172-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v10i1.9134

Statistics of Semarang Municipality. (2018). Tugu Subdistrict in Figures 2017. Semarang: CV. Citra Yunda

Statistics Indonesia. (2019). Status of River Water Quality2007-2016. https://www.bps.go.id /statictable/2014/09/05/1372/status-kualitas-air-sungai-2007---2016.html/.

Schroeder, E. D. (1997) Water Wastewater Treatment. McGraw-Hill, Ich.

Sugiyono. (2012) Research Method Qualitative Quantitative and Researh & Development. Bandung: Alfabeta

Susilowati, Indah. FerdinanSyah, Angga. Suharno. And JakaAminata. (2018). Economic Valuation of Tourism Attraction of Jatijajar Cave in Kebumen Regency. Jejak 11(1):12-28. https://doi.org/10. 15294/jejak.v11i1.13523

Whittington, D., Briscoe, J., Mu, X., Baron, W.. (1990). Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Water Services in Developing Countries : A Case Study of the Use of Contingent Valuation Surveys in Southern Haiti. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 38(2).

Yakin, A. (1997). Natural Resource Economics and Environment Theory and Wisdom of Sustainable Development. Jakarta: CV Akademika PressIndo.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.