ANALISIS PENETAPAN NILAI GANTI KERUGIAN PROPERTI KORBAN LUAPAN LUMPUR LAPINDO
(1) Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Departemen Keuangan RI
(2) Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Mataram
Abstract
This research studies the fairness of the agreed compensation property nominal value for the victims of the Sidoarjo mudflow. This research was performed by comparing the agreed nominal amount of compensation with the estimated values based on the property price model. The model was developed based on the market property (lands and houses) prices at the region in normal condition before disaster. The market property price is then adjusted based on the principal of time value of money. Property in this research is limited to losses of lands and houses. Analysis tool which was used for estimating property value in normal condition is multiple linear regression using theOrdinary Least Square. The significance of one-sample tests of hypothesis using testing for a population mean was utilized to examine the fairness of compensation determination by PT. Lapindo Brantas, Inc. compared to the real property price. Results of analyses show that the variables of land area, house area, road width in front of houses and lands, transaction time, house quality affect significantly and positively with the R2 value of 0.904033. Analysis results also confirm that the property compensationet property compensation. Results of the population mean significance test shows that nominal compensation price agreed on December 4 2006 is higher than the calculated real price on normal condition (over assessment). determined by PT.Lapindo Brantas, Inc. is statistically different from the mark
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Institute of Real Estate Appraiser (AIREA), 2001, The Appraisal of Real Estate, 12th Edition, Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois.
Ekel, Patrick Adlay, 2003. “Model Penentuan Ganti Kerugian Pengambilalihan Tanah Untuk Kepen¬tingan Umum : Studi Kasus Kawasan Janti di Jogjakarta” Tesis S-2, Program Pasca-sarjana UGM, Jogjakarta (tidak dipublikasikan).
Harjanto, Budi, 2006, “Kapitalisasi Berbagai Jenis Penggunaan Properti dalam Rangka Penentuan Zona Nilai Tanah di Kota Yogyakarta“, Disertasi S-3, Program Pascasarjana UGM, Yogyakarta.
Lind, Douglas A., William G. Marchal, and Samuel A. Wathen, 2005, Statistical Technique in Business and Economics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Nelson, Glyn., Hansz, Andrew J., Cypher, Matthew L., 2005, “The Influence of Artificial Water Canal on Resedential Sale Prices”, The Appraisal Journal, Spring.
Reilly, Gene, Sun, Wu and Pignataro, Louis J., 2001, “Partial Acquisition of Right of way in New Jersey”, The Appraisal Journal, January, 64-71.
Salassi, Michael E., Champagne, Lonnie P., and Giesler, G. Grant, 2000, “Valuation of Perennial Crops Associated with Agricultural Land Sales: The Case of Sugarcane in Louisiana”, Journal of The ASFMRA, 11-21.
Salassi, Michael E. and Janis Breaux, 2001, “Comparison of Valuation Methods for Pereanial Sugarcane Crops Associated with Eminent Domain Land Acquisition”, The Appraisal Journal, January, 44-51.
Sirmans, G. Stacy, Macpherson, David A., dan Zietz, Emily N., 2005, “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, Volume 13, Number 1.
SPI, 2002, Standar Penilaian Indonesia 2002, Jakarta.
Sumardjono, Maria, 1994, Permasalahan Tanah dalam Dinamika Pembangunani, Makalah (tidak dipublikasikan).
www.indonesia.go.id
_____, 1993, Keputusan Presiden Nomor 55 Tahun 1993 tentang Pengadaan Tanah bagi Kepen-tingan Umum, Jakarta.
_____, 2007, Peraturan Presiden Nomor 14 Tahun 2007 tentang Badan Penanggulangan Lumpur Sidoarjo, Jakarta.
_____, 1960, Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria, Jakarta.
_____, 1961, Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 1961 tentang Pencabutan Hak-hak Atas Tanah dan Benda-benda yang Ada di Atasnya, Jakarta.
_____, 2007, Kompas, Jakarta
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.