The Notary's Responsibility Regarding Deliberate Dishonesty Actions
(1) Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya
(2) Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya
Abstract
A notary is a public official who performs his or her position based on the authority given to him or her by the law. A notary declares and states the wishes of all parties in the authentic deed according to his or her legal knowledge. Prior to that, a notary has to make sure the deed does not violate the law, public order, or morality. One of the common problems with notarial deeds is when false statements are found in an authentic deed. The inclusion of false statements above into an authentic deed is a crime that is covered by Article 263 Paragraph (1) juncto Paragraph 264 Paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Law. This research is normative juridical research with a statutory approach and conceptual approach. The conclusion of this research is most of the false statements found in authentic deeds came from the parties interested in the deed; however, this does not mean a notary cannot be involved. Criminal law seeks material truth, and material truth cannot be assumed that the notary has only reiterated the wishes of the involved parties. The Notary may make two kinds of mistakes, intentionally or negligently. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between deliberate dishonesty and malpractice in notaries during their duties. A notary who intentionally submits false information to their deed the measures it called an act of deliberate dishonesty.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adjie, Habib. Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris). Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.
———. Meneropong Khazanah Notaris Dan PPAT Di Indonesia (Kumpulan Tulisan Tentang Notaris Dan PPAT). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2009.
———. “Sanksi Perdata Dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik Berkaitan Dengan Pembuatan Akta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Disertasi, Program Doktor Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 2007.
Afifah, Kunni. “Tanggung Jawab Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Secara Perdata Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya.” Lex Renaissance 2, no. 1 (2017): 10.
AmaliaTaufani. Tinjauan Yuridis Malpraktek Medis Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2011.
Bodiono, Herlien. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata Di Bidang Kenotariatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2008.
Diatmika, I Gusti Agung Oka, I Dewa Gde Atmadja, Sri Utari, and Ni Ketut. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Jabatan Notaris Berkaitan Dengan Adanya Dugaan Malpraktek Dalam Proses Pembuatan Akta Otentik.” Doctoral dissertation, Udayana University, 2014.
Din, Teresia. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Terindikasi Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 2 (2019): 171–83.
Fuditia, Megacaesa, Ni Made Srinitri, and Anis Mashdurohatun. “Legal Protection Of Notary Recipients Of The Protocol For Deeds Which Allegedly Is Related To Legal Problems In Semarang City.” Jurnal Akta 7, no. 2 (2020): 177–82.
Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary. Edited by St. Paul Minn. 7th ed. Minnesota: West Group, 1990.
Hasan, Djuniatno, Agus Ekhsan, and Gunarto Gunarto. “Implementation of Legal Protection of Confidential Obligation Notary In Running Position.” Jurnal Akta 7, no. 2 (2020): 223–28.
Hendra, Rahmad. “Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Yang Penghadapnya Mempergunakan Identitas Palsu Di Kota Pekanbaru.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2012).
Mowoka, Valentine Phebe. “Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya.” Lex Et Societatis 2, no. 4 (2014).
Muhammad, Fabryan Nur, Yeni Widowaty, and Trisno Raharjo. “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris.” Media of Law and Sharia 1, no. 1 (2019): 1–13.
Muri, Dewi Padusi Daeng, Galang Prayogo, and Faisal Arif. “The Rights and Obligations of Notaries According to Indonesian Law Concerning Notary Position.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 9, no. 8 (2018): 875–81.
Nahak, Simon. “The Liability of Criminal Law towards a Notary Official in the Crime of Embezzlement at the Denpasar District Court.” NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan 5, no. 2 (2020): 107–17.
Nico. Tanggungjawab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum. Yogyakarta: CDSBL, 2003.
Ohiwutun, Y.A. Triana. Bunga Rampai Hukum Kedokteran. Malang: Banyumedia, 2007.
Prajitno, A.A. Andi. Pengetahuan Praktis Tentang Apa Dan Siapa Notaris Di Indonesia? Surabaya: Putra Media Nusantara, 2010.
Sholikhah, Entin, and Jawade Hafidz. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Jabatan Notaris Yang Diduga Melakukan Malpraktek Dalam Proses Pembuatan Akta Otentik.” Jurnal Akta 4, no. 1 (2017): 47–50.
Siahaan, Kartini. “Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana.” Recital Review 1, no. 2 (2019): 72–88.
Silalahi, Enriko, and Akhmad Khisni. “Legal Review Of Malpractice Notary In The Notary’s Deed.” Jurnal Akta 5, no. 3 (2018): 647–54.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Herkutanto. Pengantar Hukum Kesehatan. Bandung: Rermadja Karya, 1987.
Tedjosaputro, Liliana. Etika Profesi Notaris (Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana). Yogyakarta: BIGRAF Publishing, 1995.
Tobing, G.H.S. Lumban. Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Gelora Aksara Pratama, 1982.
Wiryomartani, Winanto. “Notary Malpractice in Carrying Out Their Duties and Authorities.” Global Legal Review 1, no. 2 (2021): 143–56.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Andyna Susiawati Achmad, Astrid Athina Indradewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Private and Commercial Law
P-ISSN: 2599-0314 E-ISSN: 2599-0306
Department of Private and Commercial Law
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang
K3 Building, 1st Floor
Sekaran Campus, Gunungpati, Semarang, Central Java 50229
Telp/Fax: (024) 8507891
Email: [email protected]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.